Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Scientific literacy and Thailand science education

Pages
335–349
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper considers interpretations of the term scientific literacy in Thailand, and examines the implications of this for science education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Education and political leaders worldwide are increasingly placing emphasis on developing scientific literacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This also is the case in Thailand with science education influenced by educational reform in 1999, in which the goals of science education are shaped by the notion of scientific literacy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper considers interpretations of the term scientific literacy in Thailand, and examines the implications of this for science education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Education and political leaders worldwide are increasingly placing emphasis on developing scientific literacy. This also is the case in Thailand with science education influenced by educational reform in 1999, in which the goals of science education are shaped by the notion of scientific literacy. Thai science education emphasizes the scientific knowledge, the nature of science, and the relationship between science technology and society. Although the school science curriculum features scientific literacy, Thai science education research, articles, national tests, and teaching and learning emphasize scientific achievement with little concern about science as a way of knowing. However, some attempts at developing scientific literacy have been made recently. Some school science curricula and teaching and learning has tried to organize science learning emphasizing the relationship between science, technology and society based on the Thai context. Such cases seek to develop students’ scientific literacy through local wisdom; specifically, King Bhumibol Adulyadej’s philosophy of sufficiency economy, moral infusion, and the Buddhism way of life. This paper considers interpretations of the term scientific literacy in Thailand, and examines the implications of this for science education.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUENYONG, C., NARJAIKAEW, P. (2022). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 335–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/540883

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2006). Habits of mind. Retrieved 18 December 2006, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/ rsl/online/SFAA/CHAP12.HTM Attachoo, P. (2001). Research report of classroom research: Science teaching through science, technology and society/constructivism for grade 7 students. IPST Journal, 30(115), 29-35.
  2. Boujaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal Science Education, 24(2), 139-156.
  3. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Chiapetta, E.L. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Education, 30(7), 787-797.
  4. Chotethaisong, C. (1998). A comparative study of learning achieving and attitudes towards pollution of mathayomsuksa V (Grade 11) students between science-technology and society (STS) approach and the conventional approach. Unpublished masters of education thesis, Khon Kaen University. Dahsah, C., & Faikhamta, C. (2008). Science education in Thailand: Science curriculum reform in transition. In R.K. Coll & N. Taylor. (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp.291-300). Rotterdam: Sense. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
  5. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2001). Introducing STL: A philosophy and teaching approach for science education. London: International Council of Associations for Science Education. Hurd, P. (1998). Science literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416. Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (2002). The Manual of content of science learning. Bangkok: Curusaphaladphoa. Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (2007). Programme for international student assessment OECD/PISA. Retrieved 18 Aril 2009, from http://www.ipst.ac.th/eval_standard/pisa/executive%20sum_Tha_for%20web2.pdf [in Thai]. Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2008). National science curriculum standards:The basic education curriculum B.E.2544. Retrieved 14 May 2008, from http://kroo.ipst.ac.th/ipst/eng/curriculum/ScienceCurriculum.pdf
  6. Jenkins, E. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. Schoo