Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Science teachers' beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda

Pages
25–48
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I will follow these perspectives by presenting sources of forming teacher’s beliefs which will lead to a discussion about potentials of changing teachers’ beliefs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study of teachers’ beliefs forms part of the process of understanding how teachers conceptualize their work which in turn is important to the understanding of teachers’ practices and their decisions in the classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A growing body of research argues that teachers’ beliefs should be studied within a framework that is aware of the influence of culture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I will follow these perspectives by presenting sources of forming teacher’s beliefs which will lead to a discussion about potentials of changing teachers’ beliefs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study of teachers’ beliefs forms part of the process of understanding how teachers conceptualize their work which in turn is important to the understanding of teachers’ practices and their decisions in the classroom. A growing body of research argues that teachers’ beliefs should be studied within a framework that is aware of the influence of culture. These studies also argue that teachers’ beliefs and practices cannot be examined out of context. This shows that the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their practices is complex and context dependent. Some researchers have found consistencies between teachers’ beliefs and their practices whilst others have found inconsistencies. The purpose of this paper is to present an argument about the relationship of teachers’ beliefs and practices and to find out frameworks of understanding the consistency and inconsistency of this relationship. In this paper, I explore the nature of teachers’ beliefs. Then, I discuss how teachers’ beliefs have been formed. Also, I will argue the relationship between knowledge and beliefs. Researchers’ key vision of the relationship between beliefs and knowledge was that “whether knowledge directs beliefs or beliefs leads to knowledge. I will argue that the relationship among beliefs, knowledge and practices are intertwined. Then, I present sociocultural perspectives to explain the consistency and inconsistency between teachers’ beliefs and practices. I will follow these perspectives by presenting sources of forming teacher’s beliefs which will lead to a discussion about potentials of changing teachers’ beliefs.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANSOUR, N. (2022). Science teachers' beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 25–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/540875

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abell, S. K. (1990). A case for the elementary science specialist. School Science and Mathematics, 90 (4), 291-301.
  2. Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Education, 76 (6), 581-596.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action control: from cognition to behaviour (pp.11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behaviour. London: Open University Press,
  4. Milton Keynes. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour, Journal of Applied social Psychology, 32, 1-20.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Barnes, D. (1973). Language in the classroom. London: Open University Press,
  6. Milton Keynes. Bartholmew, J. (1976) Schooling teachers: the myth of the liberal college. In G. Whitty & M. Young (Eds.), Exploration in the politics of school knowledge. England: Nafferton. Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.
  7. Bennett, N., Wood, L., & Rogers, S. (1997). Teaching through play. Buckingham: open University Press.
  8. Bentley, D., & Watts, M. (1989). Learning and teaching in school science: Practical alternatives. Philadelphia: Open University Press, Milton Keynes. Blasé, J.J. (1986). A qualitative analysis of sources of teacher stress: Consequences for performance. American Education Research Journal, 23, 13-40.
  9. Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1994). Teachers’ beliefs. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), the international Encyclopedia of education (pp. 6100-6103). Oxford: Pergamon; New York: Elsevier Science. Borg, M. G. (1990). Occupational stress in British educational settings: A review. Educational Psychology, 10, 103-126.
  10. Borg, M. G., Riding, R. J., & Falzon, J. M. (1991). Stress in teaching. A study occupational stress and its determinants, job satisfaction and career commitment among primary school teachers. Educational Psychology, 11, 59-75.
  11. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & designs (pp.35-65). New York: Teachers College Press.
  12. Brickhouse, N. W. (1989). The teaching of the philoso