SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2010 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Müfredatın dışındaki öğrenme ortamlarında kız ve erkek öğrenciler arasındaki farklar

Differences between boys and girls in extracurricular learning settings

Katrin BAETZ
Sebastian WITTLER
Matthias WILDE
Pages
51–64
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are discussed within the framework of the Contextual Model of Learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Only few psychological differences between the sexes can be proven empirically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A pre/post-test design was conducted with 223 fifth graders of the highest stratification level (Gymnasium).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are discussed within the framework of the Contextual Model of Learning.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Only few psychological differences between the sexes can be proven empirically. Presented here is a study about learning in the extracurricular environment of a zoological garden during a school excursion with particular regard to the differences between boys and girls. In the main focus are, hereby, motivational and cognitive levels of the aforementioned learning situation. A pre/post-test design was conducted with 223 fifth graders of the highest stratification level (Gymnasium). Girls showed a higher degree of intrinsic motivation and also had statistically significant more knowledge gain in the subscale of open-ended knowledge-items. The results are discussed within the framework of the Contextual Model of Learning.

Özet

Cinsiyetler arasındaki sadece birkaç psikolojik farklılık deneysel kanıtlanabilir. Burada sunulan çalışma hayvanat bahçesine bir okul gezisi esnasındaki müfredat dışındaki bir öğrenme ortamındaki kız ve erkekler arasındaki farklarla ilgilidir. Esas odak noktası sözü edilen öğrenme ortamının bilişsel ve motivasyonal düzeyleridir. Yüksek lise (Gymnasium) düzeyindeki 223 beşinci sınıf öğrencisine bir ön test-son test çalışma deseni uygulanmıştır. Kız öğrenclier daha yüksek düzeyde bir içsel motivasyon göstermişler ve açık uçlu bilgi sorularında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı daha yüksek bir kazanım elde etmişlerdir. Sonuçlar öğrenmenin bağlamsal modeli çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAETZ, K., WITTLER, S., WILDE, M. (2022). Müfredatın dışındaki öğrenme ortamlarında kız ve erkek öğrenciler arasındaki farklar. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/540861

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, California:Wadsworth, Inc. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom‘s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2008). Asking scientists: a decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country. Science Education, 93(1), 131-160.
  2. Beuster, F. (2006). Die jungenkatastrophe. Das überforderte geschlecht.(Reinbek: Rowohlt-Verlag. Bischof-Köhler, D. (2004). Von natur aus anders. Die psychologie der geschlechtsunterschiede. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag. Bitgood, S. (1989). School field trips: an overview. Visitor Behavior, 4 (2), 3-6. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2006). Indikatoren zur ausbildung im hochschulbereich. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Web site: http://www.bmbf.de/pub/sdi-06-07.pdf BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2008). Bildungs(miss)erfolge von jungen und berufswahlverhalten bei jungen/männlichen jugendlichen. Retrieved August 13, 2009, from Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Web site: http://www.bmbf.de/pub/Bildungsmisserfolg.pdf
  3. Boldt, U., & Schütte, M. (2006). Jungen in ihrer vielfalt wahrnehmen! Zur arbeit mit jungen in der grundschule. Die Grundschulzeitschrift, 194, 4-8.
  4. Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2002). Forschungsmethoden und evaluation für human- und sozialwissenschaftler. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  5. Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women‟s math performance. Science, 314(5798), 435. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, London: Plenum Press.
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der motivation und ihre bedeutung für die pädagogik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 39, 223-238.
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Intrinsic motivation inventory (IMI). Retrieved September 1, 2005, from Web site: http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures /intrins.html Dierking, L. D., Ellenbogen, K. M., & Falk, J. H. (2004). In principle, in practice: Perspectives on a decade of museum learning research. Science Education, 88(S1), 1-3.
  8. Dierking, L.