Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2011 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Fenle alakalı ilgi, tutum ve imajlar: Öğrencilerin ifadelerini okul feni, öğretmen ve popüler bilimle bağlama

Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with the voices of school Science, teachers, and popular science

Pages
141–159
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested that a comprehensive and integrated investigation of the voices of students, of school science and teachers‟, and of popular science is required in order to make informed, research-based decisions on designing school science curricula and teaching.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the last decades students‟ science-related interests, attitudes, and images of science and scientists, and their differentiations according to gender, culture, and socio-economic status have been investigated by a multitude of research studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These aspects of students‟ voices seem to be interrelated and to also affect students‟ achievement in science and their relevant study and career aspirations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested that a comprehensive and integrated investigation of the voices of students, of school science and teachers‟, and of popular science is required in order to make informed, research-based decisions on designing school science curricula and teaching.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

During the last decades students‟ science-related interests, attitudes, and images of science and scientists, and their differentiations according to gender, culture, and socio-economic status have been investigated by a multitude of research studies. These aspects of students‟ voices seem to be interrelated and to also affect students‟ achievement in science and their relevant study and career aspirations. Moreover, school science and teachers, as well as popular science are considered as factors determining students‟ voices. This paper attempts a mapping of relevant literature in order to highlight crucial outcomes and draw educational and research implications. It is suggested that a comprehensive and integrated investigation of the voices of students, of school science and teachers‟, and of popular science is required in order to make informed, research-based decisions on designing school science curricula and teaching.

Özet

Son on yılda öğrencilerin fenle ilişkili ilgileri, tutumları ve fen imajları, bilim adamları ve bunların cinsiyet, kültür, sosyo-ekonomik durumlar bağlamında farklılaşması birçok çalışmada araştırılmıştır. Öğrenci ifadeleri de bu yönlerin onların fendeki başarıları, kariyer istekleri ile ilgili ve etkiliyor gözükmektedir. Hatta okul fenni ve öğretmenler gibi popüler bilim, öğrencilerin ifadelerini belirleyen faktörler olarak düşünülmektedir. Bu makale önemli çıktıları aydınlatmak amacı ile ilgili literatürü haritalamayı, eğitsel ve araştırma imalarını resmetmeyi denemektedir. Okul fen müfredatı ve öğretiminin tasarımında, yeterli, araştırma tabanlı kararlar almak amacı ile öğrenci, okul fenni ve öğretmenlerin ifadelerinin, kapsamlı ve bütünleşmiş araştırmasının gerekliliği önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHRISTIDOU, V. (2022). Fenle alakalı ilgi, tutum ve imajlar: Öğrencilerin ifadelerini okul feni, öğretmen ve popüler bilimle bağlama. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 141–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/540835

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aikenhead, G. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 607–629.
  2. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 719-747.
  3. Baird, J. R., & Penna, C. (1992). Survey research. In R. Baird (Ed.), Shared Adventure: A View of Quality Teaching and Learning (Second Report of the Teaching and Learning Science in Schools Project) (pp. 185–274). Victoria: Monash University. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3-27.
  4. Barman, C. R. (1999). Students' views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 43-54.
  5. Basalla, G. (1976). The depiction of science in popular culture. In G. Holton & W. A. Blanpied (Eds.), Science and its public (pp. 261-278). Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. Bauer, H. H. (1994). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  6. Beardsley, D. C., & O‟Dowd, D. D. (1961). The college-student image of the scientist, Science, 133, 997-1001.
  7. Bianchini, J. (1993, April). The high school biology textbook: A changing mosaic of gender, science and purpose. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research As-sociation, Atlanta, GA. Bianchini, J. A., Johnston, C. C., Oram, S. Y., & Cavazos, L. M. (2003). Learning to teach science in contemporary and equitable ways: the successes and struggles of first-year science teachers. Science Education, 87, 419-443.
  8. Biesta, G. (2004). “Mind the gap!”: Communication and the educational relation. In C. Bingham & A. Sidorkin (Eds.), No education without relation (pp. 11-22). New York: Peter Lang. Bowtell, E. (1996). Educational stereotyping: Children‟s perceptions of scientists: 1990‟s style. Inves-tigating: Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 12, 4-10.
  9. Boylan, C. R., Hill, D. M., Wallace A. R., & Wheeler A. E. (1992).
  10. Beyond stereotypes, Science Edu-cation, 76, 465-476.
  11. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construc-tion of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441-458.
  12. Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T.