SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2011 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Formal olmayan bir fen eğitim programında bilişsel süreçlerin düzeyi: Scouting fen değer nişanı ve gözden geçirilmiş bloom taksonomisi

Levels of cognitive processes in a non-formal science education program: Scouting's science merit badges and the revised bloom's taxonomy

Matthew VICK
Michael P. GARVEY
Pages
173–190
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, remembering and applying cognitive processes were emphasized the most.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The United States Boy Scout merit badge program provides non-formal educational experiences for boys from ages 10-17.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study analyzes the objectives of the twenty-three science related merit badges using the lens of the revised Bloom's taxonomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, remembering and applying cognitive processes were emphasized the most.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The United States Boy Scout merit badge program provides non-formal educational experiences for boys from ages 10-17. This study analyzes the objectives of the twenty-three science related merit badges using the lens of the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Merit badges requirements serve as objectives for this program. The verbs in the requirements were classified according to the revised taxonomy. Patterns were then analyzed within the merit badges, within the verbiage of the requirements, and across the entire science merit badge program. Overall, remembering and applying cognitive processes were emphasized the most. Recommendations are made for improving the clarity of merit badge requirements for Scouting and other non-formal educational programs.

Özet

Birleşik devletler erkek değer nişan programı 10-17 yaş arası erkekler için formal olmayan eğitim tecrübeleri sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma tekrar gözden geçirilmiş bloom taksonomisini kullanarak yirmi üç fenle ilişkili değer nişanlarının amaçlarını analiz etmektedir. Değer nişanı gereksinimleri bu program içim amaçları sağlamakladır. Gereksinimlerdeki fiiller gözden geçirilmiş taksonomiye göre sınıflandırıldı. Modeller daha sonra değer nişanları içinde, gereksinimleri ve tüm fen değer nişanı programı boyunca analiz edildi. Genel olarak hatırlama ve bilişsel süreçleri uygulama en fazla vurgulandı. Scouting ve diğer formal olmayan eğitsel programlar için değer nişanı gerekliliklerinin netliğini geliştirmek amacı ile öneriler yapıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

VICK, M., GARVEY, M. P. (2022). Formal olmayan bir fen eğitim programında bilişsel süreçlerin düzeyi: Scouting fen değer nişanı ve gözden geçirilmiş bloom taksonomisi. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 173–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/540828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Altheide, D.L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Edu-cational Psychology, 8(4), 213–230.
  2. Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assist-ing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of education objectives. New York: Longman. Bloom, B. S. (1956).
  3. Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman. Boy Scouts of America. (BSA) (2010a). Year in Review. Retrieved from http://www.scouting.org/About/FactSheets/YearinReview.aspx on August 7, 2010. Boy Scouts of America. (2010b). Guide for Merit Badge Counselors. Retrieved from http://www.scouting.org/scoutsource/BoyScouts/GuideforMeritBadgeCounselors.aspx on Au-gust 7, 2010, Boy Scouts of America. (2010c). Merit Badge Requirements. Retrieved from http://www.scouting.org/scoutsource/BoyScouts/AdvancementandAwards/MeritBadges.aspx on August 7, 2010.
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: What makes visitors want to learn? Museum News, 74, 34–37 & 59–61
  5. Furst, E. (1994). Bloom's taxonomy: Philosophical and educational issues. In Anderson L & Sos-niak, L. (Eds.) Bloom's Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective (pp. 28-40). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education. Gerber, B.L., Cavallo, A.M.L., & Marek, E.A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549.
  6. Haim, E. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
  7. Jarman, R. (2005). Science learning through Scouting: an understudied context for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 427-450.
  8. Kreitzer, A., & Madaus, G. (1994). Empirical investigations of the hierarchical structure of the tax-onomy. In Anderson, L, & Sosniak, L. (Eds.) Bloom's Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospec-tive (pp. 64-81). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education. Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: science and the public. International Journal of Environ-mental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
  9. Miller, F.A. & Alvarado, K. (2005). Incorporating documents into qualitative nursing research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National