Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Iowa chautauqua profesyonel gelişim programı için beş öğretmen lideri kullanarak yapılan yapılandırmacı öğretim pratikleri

Constructivist teaching practices used by five teacher leaders for the Iowa chautauqua professional development program

Pages
197–216
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There are implica-tions for planning and improving classroom learning environments for enrollees in new efforts that were suggested by teacher leaders.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a wealth of research examining learning environments as one of the vari-ables that contributes to academic success for students studying science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There has been a lack of evidence focusing specifically on how participation in the Iowa Chautau-qua Professional Development Program actually increases use of constructivist teaching practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There are implica-tions for planning and improving classroom learning environments for enrollees in new efforts that were suggested by teacher leaders.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a wealth of research examining learning environments as one of the vari-ables that contributes to academic success for students studying science. A constructivist learning environment has been explored as one way to assist students in achieving greater success with science learning. There is a lack of research concerning how and if success-ful teachers continue to change over time. This study was designed to address such re-search gaps. The teacher leaders involved served as staff members for Iowa Chautauqua and continue to develop and improve in their use of constructivist practices. There has been a lack of evidence focusing specifically on how participation in the Iowa Chautau-qua Professional Development Program actually increases use of constructivist teaching practices. Results of the research indicate that the teacher leaders continue to develop fur-ther in their use of constructivist practices over time. The Constructivist Learning Envi-ronment Survey (CLES) scores were used to indicate improvement. There are implica-tions for planning and improving classroom learning environments for enrollees in new efforts that were suggested by teacher leaders.

Özet

Fen çalışan öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına katkıda bulunan bir değişken olarak öğ-renme ortamlarının çalışıldığı yığınla araştırma bulunmaktadır. Yapılandırmacı bir öğ-renme ortamı öğrencilerin fendeki daha yüksek başarılarını destekleyen bir yol olarak araştırılmıştır. Başarılı öğretmelerin zaman içerisinde değişime nasıl devam ettiğine dair çalışmalar eksiktir. Bu çalışma bu boşluğu doldurmayı amaçlamıştır. Lider öğretmenler Iowa Chautauqua için üye olarak hizmet vermişlerdir ve kendilerinin kullandıkları yapı-landırmacı pratiklerinin geliştirilmesine devam etmişlerdir. Iowa Chautauqua Profesyonel Gelişim Programına katılım yapılandırıcı öğretim pratiklerinin kullanılmasını nasıl attır-dığına dair delillere ilişkin olarak bir boşluk vardır. Araştırma sonuçları lider öğretmenle-rin süreç içerisinde yapılandırmacı pratik uygulamalarını geliştirdiklerini göstermektedir. Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Ortamı Araştırması puanları bu gelişmeyi belirlemek amacı ile kullanılmıştır. Lider öğretmenler tarafından sınıf öğrenme ortamını planlama ve gelişmesi için önerilen yeni çabaların etkileri vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUTAKOM, N., YAGER, E. R., YAGER, O. S., SİNGH, A., ALI, M. M. (2022). Iowa chautauqua profesyonel gelişim programı için beş öğretmen lideri kullanarak yapılan yapılandırmacı öğretim pratikleri. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 197–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/540826

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ali, M. M, Yager, R. E., Hacieminoglu, E., & Caliskan, I. (2010). Changes in student perceptions of their school science experiences in grades 3, 7, and 11 over a twenty- five year interim. School Science and Mathematics. Binadja, A. & Yager, R. E. (2012). Improving science learning. Semarang State University Press, Universitas Negeri Semarang – UNNES Press.
  2. In progress. Brooks, J. G., and Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervisions and Curriculum Develop-ment. Bukova-Guzel, E. (2007). The effect of a constructivist learning environment on the limit concept among mathematics student teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(3), 1189-1195.
  3. Dorman, J., Fraser, B. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1994). Rhetoric and reality: A study of classrooms in Catholic and government secondary schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New Orleans, LA. Evans, C. (2004). Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and teaching style. Educa-tional Psychology, 24(4), 509-530.
  4. Kaplan, E. J. & Kies, D. A. (1995). Teaching and learning styles: Which came first? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(1), 29-33.
  5. Kim, H., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 239-249.
  6. Lucas, K. B., & Rother, W. M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning: Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26(1), 103-107.
  7. McRobbie, C. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Association between student outcomes and psychosocial science environments. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78-85. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the constructivist learning environment survey. Learning Environ-ments Research, 8, 109-133.
  9. Ogbuehi, P. I. & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment attitudes and conceptual develop-ment associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Research, 10(2), 101-114.
  10. Oh, P. S. (2003). Changes in science classrooms resulting from collaborative Action Research initiatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Iowa. Otting, H. & Zwall, W. (2003). Assessment in a constructivist learning environment