Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen bilgisi öğretmen test kontrol listesini çizerek fen bilgisi öğretimi hakkındaki inançlarını belirleyen bir boylamsal çalışma

A longitudinal study to identify prospective science teachers’ beliefs about science teaching using the draw-a-science-teacher-test checklist

Pages
291–311
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This teaching style remained consistent across the three admin-istrations of the DASTT-C instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a longitudinal study aimed at revealing the beliefs of prospective science teachers in the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University/Sultanate of Oman about science teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consisted of (45) prospective science teachers in the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This teaching style remained consistent across the three admin-istrations of the DASTT-C instrument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This is a longitudinal study aimed at revealing the beliefs of prospective science teachers in the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University/Sultanate of Oman about science teaching. To achieve this aim a Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist (DASTT-C) tool was used. The study sample consisted of (45) prospective science teachers in the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University. The instrument was applied to the sample three times: before the Science Method I course, after finishing this course and after fin-ishing the Science Method II course and the Practicum. The results revealed that after completing the Science Methods I course, prospective science teachers shifted signifi-cantly from a teacher-centered approach to the intermediate state between the teacher-centered and student-centered. There was no significant change after the Science Meth-ods II course and the Practicum. Furthermore, the results also showed that among the three different teaching styles: exploratory, conceptual and explicit indicated in the se-cond part of the DASTT-C instrument, prospective science teachers in the current study were found to be at the conceptual teaching style, closer to the boundary with the ex-ploratory teaching style. This teaching style remained consistent across the three admin-istrations of the DASTT-C instrument.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Sultan Qaboos University/Sultanate of Oman’daki fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen bilgisi öğretimine yönelik inançlarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu amacı sağlamak için Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Test Kontrol Listesini Çizme (FBÖTK-Ç) aracı kullanılmıştır. Sultan Qaboos Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesine kayıtlı öğretmen adaylarından 45’i bu çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Araç örnekleme üç kez uygulanmıştır: Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi I dersinden önce, bu dersin bitiminden sonra ve Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi II dersi ve Uygulama dersinden sonra. Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi I dersi bit-tikten sonra fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının, öğretmen merkezli yaklaşımdan öğretmen ve öğrenci merkezi arasında bir duruma geçtikleri sonucu ortaya çıkmıştır. Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi II ve Uygulama dersinden sonra anlamlı bir değişim bulunmamıştır. Ayrıca, bu araştırmada üç farklı öğretme stilinden (araştırmacı, kavramsal ve açık) FBÖTK-Ç aracı-nın ikinci kısmında öğretmen adaylarının kavramsal öğretme stilinin araştırmacı öğretme stilinin sınırına daha yakın olduğu sonucu bulunmuştur. Kavramsal öğretme stili, FBÖTK-Ç aracının üç uygulamasıyla tutarlı kalmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AMBUSAIDI, K. A., BALUSHI, M. S. A. (2022). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen bilgisi öğretmen test kontrol listesini çizerek fen bilgisi öğretimi hakkındaki inançlarını belirleyen bir boylamsal çalışma. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 291–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/540823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Balushi, S. M. (1998). Science teachers’ perceptions regarding the integration of both inquiry and science applications approaches into their laboratory activities. The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. Al-Harthi, A. S. (2008). The relationship between science teacher's beliefs about the use of the inquiry based learning strategy and their classroom practices. Unpublished Master The-sis, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. Anderson, D., Imdieke, S., & Standerford, N. S. (2011). Feedback please: Studying self in the online classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 3-15.
  2. Bryan, L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief sys-tem about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835-868.
  3. Bryan, L. & Atwater, M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparations program. Science Education, 86, 821-839.
  4. Bryan, L. & Abell, S. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121-139.
  5. Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish preservice elementary teachers' self –efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8: 649-666.
  6. Calderhead, J. & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
  7. Chai, C.S. (2010). Teachers' epistemic beliefs and their pedagogical beliefs: A qualitative case study among Singaporean teachers in the context of ICT- supported reforms. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 128-139.
  8. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw – A- Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 225-265.
  9. Choi, S. & Ramsey, J. (2010). Constructing elementary teachers' beliefs, attitudes, attitudes, and practical knowledge through an inquiry- based elementary science course. School Scien-ce and Mathematics, 109(6), 313-324.
  10. El-Deghaidy, H. (2006). An investigation of pre-service teacher's self-efficacy and self-image as a science teacher in Egypt. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 1-22.
  11. Finson, K.D., Beaver, J. B. & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development of and field test of checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195-205.
  12. Foss, D. & Kleinsasser, R. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' views of