SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Eğitsel sinirbilim: Sinirsel etik üzerine düşünceler

Educational neuroscience: Neuroethical considerations

Helene LALANCETTE
Stephen R. CAMPBELL
Pages
37–52
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We argue that by integrating ethical positions to research design and methods in educational neuroscience, it would be-come possible to contextualize results and the diffusion of results, which in turn insure bet-ter credibility among the wide variety of stakeholders to new knowledge emerging from educational neuroscience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Research design and methods in educational neuroscience involve using neuroscientific tools such as brain image technologies to investigate cognitive functions and inform educa-tional practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ethical challenges raised by research in social neuroscience have be-come the focus of neuroethics, a sub-discipline of bioethics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We argue that by integrating ethical positions to research design and methods in educational neuroscience, it would be-come possible to contextualize results and the diffusion of results, which in turn insure bet-ter credibility among the wide variety of stakeholders to new knowledge emerging from educational neuroscience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Research design and methods in educational neuroscience involve using neuroscientific tools such as brain image technologies to investigate cognitive functions and inform educa-tional practices. The ethical challenges raised by research in social neuroscience have be-come the focus of neuroethics, a sub-discipline of bioethics. More specifically here, we give an overview of neuroethical issues arising from brain imaging studies and neuropharmacol-ogy in education, from neuromyths to potential stigmatization of learners, and discuss the relevance of establishing the field of educational neuroethics. We argue that by integrating ethical positions to research design and methods in educational neuroscience, it would be-come possible to contextualize results and the diffusion of results, which in turn insure bet-ter credibility among the wide variety of stakeholders to new knowledge emerging from educational neuroscience.

Özet

Eğitsel sinirbilimdeki metotlar ve araştırma dizaynı, bilişsel fonksiyonları araştıran beyin imaj teknolojileri gibi sinirbilimsel araçları ihtiva eder ve eğitsel uygulamaları bilgilendirir. Sosyal sinirbilimdeki araştırmalardan kaynaklanan etik sorunlar biyoetikin bir alt disiplini olan siniretikin odağı olmuştur. Burada, nöroefsaneden öğrenenin potansiyel stigmatizasyona kadar uzaman eğitimdeki nörofarmakolojisine ve beyin görüntüleme ça-lışmalarından kaynaklana nöroetiksel konulara bir genel bakışı ile ele alarak eğitsel nöroetikin alanının belirlenmesine ilgisi tarışılacaktır. Eğitsel nörobilimdeki metotları ve araştırma dizaynını etik pozisyonlara entegre ederek tartışıyoruz, böylece eğitsel nörobilimden çıkan yeni bilgileri geniş ve çeşitli paydaşlar arasındaki güvenirliliği garanti ederek sonuçların yayılması ver kavramsallaşmasını mümkün olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

LALANCETTE, H., CAMPBELL, S. R. (2022). Eğitsel sinirbilim: Sinirsel etik üzerine düşünceler. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 37–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/540817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Butterworth, B. (2008). Developmental dyscalculia, in Reed & Warner-Rogers (Eds.) Child neu-ropsychology: Concepts, theory and practice (pp. 358-373).
  2. Wiley-Blackwell. Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Minds, brains, and learning: Understanding the psychological and educa-tional relevance of neuroscientific research. New York: Guilford Press.
  3. Cacioppo, J., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connec-tion. Castle House, London: W.W. Norton and Company. Campbell, S. R. & Dawson, A. J. (1995). Learning as embodied action. In Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.) NATO Advanced research workshop: Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education, NATO ASI Series F, Vol.138, 233-49,
  4. Springer, Berlin. Campbell, S. R. (2010). Embodied minds and dancing brains: New opportunities for research in mathematics education. In Bharath Sriraman & Lyn English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers, (pp. 309–331). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Campbell, S. R. (2011). Educational neuroscience: Motivations, methodology and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 43, No. 1, 9-16.
  5. Chemero, A., & Heyser, C., (2009). Methodology and reduction in the behavioral neurosciences: Object exploration as a case study. In Bickle, J. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
  6. Churchland, P. (1991). Our brains, our selves: Reflections on neuroethical questions. In D. J. Roy, B. E. Wynne, R. W. Old (Eds.), Bioscience and Society (pp. 77-96). John Wiley & Sons. Churchland, P. (1998). Towards a cognitive neurobiology of the moral virtues. Topoi, 17, 83–96.
  7. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Cohen, L., Vinckier, F., & Dehaene, S. (2010). Anatomical and functional correlates of acquired peripheral dyslexias. In P. Cornelissen, P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, & K. Pugh (Eds.) The Neural Basis of Reading, Oxford University Press.
  9. De Ruyter, D. (2006). Whose utopia? Which ideals? The importance of societal and personal ideals in education. In M. A. Peter, & J. Freeman-Moir (Eds.) Edutopias: new utopian think-ing in education (pp. 163-175). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  10. Delazer, M., Ischebeck, A., Domahs, F., Zamarian, L., Koppelstaetter, F., Siednetopf, C. M., et al. (2005). Learning by strategies and learning by drill: Evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25, 838–849.
  11. Deslauriers, C., Bell, E., Palmour,