Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: Developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors

Pages
1–34
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will detail the education program and assessment techniques while high- lighting each student's unique characteristics, barriers to change, and motivations for ac- tion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Achieving a sustainable future requires that individuals adopt sustainable behaviors, which are often learned and cemented at a young age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To address this gap, the pre- sent research integrates three critical yet mostly disparate bodies of research-- educational pedagogy, behavior change, and sustainability competencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will detail the education program and assessment techniques while high- lighting each student's unique characteristics, barriers to change, and motivations for ac- tion.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Achieving a sustainable future requires that individuals adopt sustainable behaviors, which are often learned and cemented at a young age. Yet, traditional education efforts have been inadequate in fostering transformative change, in part because many programs focus on fact-heavy, teacher-centered techniques while neglecting the practices that behavioral and sustainability scholars highlight as central to creating change. To address this gap, the pre- sent research integrates three critical yet mostly disparate bodies of research-- educational pedagogy, behavior change, and sustainability competencies. This interdisciplinary ap- proach to education was implemented and evaluated with a small group of students during an intensive summer program and year-long case study. The curriculum focused on food and waste behaviors and utilized experiential, real-world, problem-based methods in order to increase competence in sustainability and promote pro-environmental actions. The im- pact of the program was assessed through surveys, interviews, videos, and participant ob- servations. The data showed that significant changes in knowledge and behaviors were achieved, while suggesting that social knowledge in terms of food is more resistant to change as compared to that of waste. Throughout the year, students maintained significant behavior changes in terms of their waste decisions; however, sustainable food behaviors were more resistant to long-term change due to the students' social and cultural environ- ment. This article will detail the education program and assessment techniques while high- lighting each student's unique characteristics, barriers to change, and motivations for ac- tion.

🔖

Cite This Article

REDMAN, E. (2022). Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: Developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/540768

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Olsen, L. (2007) Summer learning and its implications: Insights from the Beginning School Study. New Directions for Youth Development, 114, 11-32.
  2. Bamberg, S. & Moser, G. (2007).
  3. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25
  4. Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454- 467. Baranowski, T., Cullen, K., & Baranowski, J. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention. Annual Review of Nutrition, 19, 17-40.
  5. Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behavior. Area, 35(3), 227-240.
  6. Barr, S. & Gilg, A. (2005). Conceptualizing and analyzing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy. Applied Geography, 25, 226-247.
  7. Bissonnette, M. & Contento, I. (2001). Adolescents' Perspectives and Food Choice Behaviors in Terms of the Environmental Impacts of Food Production Practices: Application of a Psychosocial Model. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33(2), 72-82.
  8. Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2011). Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36(2), 107-124.
  9. Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. (2010). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 308-324.
  10. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. World Commission on the Environment and Development: Oxford University Press.
  11. Cherif, A. (1995). Toward a rationale for recycling in schools. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 5-10.
  12. Church, W., & Skelton, L. (2010). Sustainability Education in K-12 Classrooms. Journal of Sustainability Education, 1. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715-730.
  13. Cortese, A. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 15-22. de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK 21 'programme in Germany: a Gestaltungskompetenz' based model for Education fo