SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Complexity measures of sports facilities allocation in urban area by metric entropy and public demand compatibility

Ayşe Giz GÜLNERMAN
Himmet KARAMAN
Özge ÖZTÜRK
Serdar BİLGİ
Birgül ARSLANOĞLU
Pages
141–148
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Metric entropy method and applications were carried out by a case study in the city of Istanbul for defining the spatial distribution of sports facility locations with the posts of people including "sports" and sports-related keywords on social media.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sports has an important role for the health of present societies and the next generations as an element of urban design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The facilities supply the communication between the dynamics of the cities and generate synergy in the city life of people interacting with each other for improvement in their lives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Metric entropy method and applications were carried out by a case study in the city of Istanbul for defining the spatial distribution of sports facility locations with the posts of people including "sports" and sports-related keywords on social media.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Metric entropy · Urban complexity and spatial distribution · Social media data

Abstract

Sports has an important role for the health of present societies and the next generations as an element of urban design. Sports facilities have strong effects on the social life in urban areas. The facilities supply the communication between the dynamics of the cities and generate synergy in the city life of people interacting with each other for improvement in their lives. Before the construction of the sports facilities, the planners must evaluate the type and size of them in terms of the population of the whole city and, the population of neighboring settlement areas, which use the facility. Entropy can be used as a criterion for the quantitative measure of spatial information on maps. In the study, the location of the sports facilities in Istanbul are compared by using the entropy as a quantitative criterion. As a result, the success of the location selection for the sports facilities in urban areas are estimated by using the entropy as a component. Metric entropy method and applications were carried out by a case study in the city of Istanbul for defining the spatial distribution of sports facility locations with the posts of people including "sports" and sports-related keywords on social media.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLNERMAN, A. G., KARAMAN, H., ÖZTÜRK, Ö., BİLGİ, S., ARSLANOĞLU, B. (2022). Complexity measures of sports facilities allocation in urban area by metric entropy and public demand compatibility. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 141–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/540727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adams, T. (1935). Outline of town and city planning: A review of past efforts and modern aims. Russell Sage Foundation. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Interdepartmental Working Group on Land Use Planning. Guidelines for land-use planning. (1993). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Anderson, L.T. (1995). Guidelines for preparing urban plans. Planners Press,
  2. American Planning Association. Bale, J. (2002). Sports geography. ISBN 0419252304, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, NY-USA. Ball, M. (2002). Cultural explanation of regional property markets: A critique. Urban Studies, 39, 1453-1469. Bjørke, J.T. (1996). Framework for entropy-based map evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 23, 78-95.
  3. Campbell, J., (1999). Harrison S. Professional sports and urban development: A brief review of issues and studies, 21. Coates, D., & Humphreys, B. R. (2003). Professional sports facilities, franchises and urban economic development. Public Finance and Management, 3(3), 335-357.
  4. Collins, M. (2014). Sport and social exclusion. ISBN 978- 0-415-56881-4,
  5. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, NYUSA. Chapin, T. (1999). The political economy of sports facility location: An end-of-the-century review and assessment Marquette Sports Law Review, 10. Chapin, T.S. (2002). Identifying the real costs and benefits of sports facilities. Citeseer. Chapin, T.S. (2004). Sports facilities as urban redevelopment catalysts: Baltimore's camden yards and cleveland's gateway. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 193-209.
  6. Davies, L.E. (2008). Sport and the local economy: The effects of stadia development on the commercial property market. Local Economy, 23, 31-46.
  7. De Wrachien, D. (2003). Land use planning: a key to sustainable agriculture. In Conservation Agriculture (pp. 471-483).
  8. Springer, Dordrecht. European Commission. (2007).
  9. White paper on sport. Fairbairn, D. (2006). Measuring map complexity. Cartographic Journal 43, 224-238.
  10. Gengec, N. (2015).
  11. Geotweet downloader. Goodchild, M.F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211-221.
  12. Goodchild, M. (2009). Neogeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of location based services, 3, 82-96.
  13. Gulnerman, A.G.; Karaman, H. (2015). In PPGIS case studies comparison and future questioning, Computational Science and its Applications (ICCSA), 15th International Conference on, IEEE: pp 104-107.
  14. Gulnerman, A.; Gengec, N.; Karaman, H. (201