Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Comparative analysis of the pysebal model and lysimeter for estimating actual evapotranspiration of soybean crop in Adana, Turkey

Pages
60–65
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed a good relationship between ETa estimated by the pySEBAL model and ETa measured by the lysimeter method, with an R2 of 0.73, an RMSE of 0.51 mm.day−1, an MBE of 0.04 mm.day−1 and a Willmott’s index of agreement (d) of 0.90.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) is an important factor in water management, especially in irrigated agriculture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate irrigation scheduling requires accurate estimation of ET.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed a good relationship between ETa estimated by the pySEBAL model and ETa measured by the lysimeter method, with an R2 of 0.73, an RMSE of 0.51 mm.day−1, an MBE of 0.04 mm.day−1 and a Willmott’s index of agreement (d) of 0.90.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Actual Evapotranspiration · Lysimeter · PySEBAL Model

Abstract

Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) is an important factor in water management, especially in irrigated agriculture. Accurate irrigation scheduling requires accurate estimation of ET. The objective of this study was to estimate the actual evapotranspiration (ETa) by the pySEBAL model and to compare it with the actual evapotranspiration measured by the lysimeter method of soybean crop in Adana, Turkey. Five Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) images and weather data were used for this study to estimate actual evapotranspiration by the pySEBAL model. The results showed a good relationship between ETa estimated by the pySEBAL model and ETa measured by the lysimeter method, with an R2 of 0.73, an RMSE of 0.51 mm.day−1, an MBE of 0.04 mm.day−1 and a Willmott’s index of agreement (d) of 0.90. Based on this study, there is a good relationship between the actual evapotranspiration estimated by the pySEBAL model and the actual evapotranspiration measured by the lysimeter method. Consequently, ETa of soybean crop can be estimated with high accuracy by the pySEBAL model in Adana, Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜ, M., GÜNDOĞDU, K. S., SAWADOGO, A., TIM, H., DEMİR, A. O., Zwart, S. J. (2022). Comparative analysis of the pysebal model and lysimeter for estimating actual evapotranspiration of soybean crop in Adana, Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 60–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/540698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. 1998. “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. p. 1-209.
  2. Allen, R. G., Tasumi, M., and Trezza, R. 2007. Satellitebased energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)-Model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133, 380-394. Anonymous. 2007.
  3. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, and Colombo: International Water Management Institute. Bala, A., Rawat, K. S., Misra, A. K., and Srivastava, A. 2015. Assessment and validation of evapotranspiration using SEBAL algorithm and Lysimeter data of IARI agricultural farm, India. GEOCARTO INT. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1076062. Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. 1995. Regionalization of surface flux densities and moisture indicators in composite terrain: a remote sensing approach under clear skies in Mediterranean climates. Ph.D. dissertation, CIP Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag, The Netherlands. 273 pp. Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Menenti, M., Feddes, R. A., and Holtslag, A. A. M. 1998. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation. J HYDROL. 212(1-4), 198-212.
  4. Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Noordman, E. J. M., Pelgrum, H., Davids, G., Thoreson, B. P., and Allen, R. G.2005. SEBAL model with remotely sensed data to improve water resources management under actual field conditions. JIRRIG DRAIN ENG. 131, 85-93.
  5. Bhattarai, N., Dougherty, M., Marzen, J. L., and Kalin, L. 2011. Validation of evaporation estimates from a modified surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) model in the south-eastern United States. REMOTE SENS LETT. 3: 6, 511–519.
  6. Centinari, M., Poni, S., Filippetti, I., Magnanini, E., and Intrieri, C. 2009. Evaluation of an open portable chamber system for measuring cover crop water use in a vineyard and comparison with a mini-lysimeter approach. AGR FOREST METEOROL. 149: 11, 1975-1982.
  7. Ernst, F., Erdoğan, S., Bayram, Y. 2019. Human resource management using geographic information systems (gis): an example from Turkish land registry directorates. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences (IJEG), Vol; 2; Issue; 02, pp. 41-51. FAO. 2009. How to feed the world in 2050. Issue brief from the High-Level Expert Forum held in Rome, 12-13
  8. October. FAO, Rome, Italy. FAO.