Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of point cloud filtering methods with data acquired by photogrammetric method and RGB-D sensors

Pages
125–135
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that Backtracking Search Optimization based filtering supplied better noise smoothing results than its competitors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Point clouds (PCs) are inevitable sources to generate digital solid model-based applications such as reverse engineering, differential 3D modelling, 3D sensing and modelling of environments, scene reconstruction, augmented reality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to increase visual, spatial and physical quality of the solid model, which is frequently used in reverse engineering, PCs must be filtered to discard noise and outlier.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that Backtracking Search Optimization based filtering supplied better noise smoothing results than its competitors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Point cloud · Photogrammetry · RGB-D Sensor

Abstract

Point clouds (PCs) are inevitable sources to generate digital solid model-based applications such as reverse engineering, differential 3D modelling, 3D sensing and modelling of environments, scene reconstruction, augmented reality. Photogrammetric methods, Terrestrial Laser Scanners and RGB-D sensors are relatively common among the technologies used to capture PCs. Because of their structural characteristics, measuring systems produce large amounts of noise that cannot be precisely predicted in type and amplitude. Due to the noisy measurements, the spatial orientations of the differential surface particles and the spatial locations of the corner points have a certain degree of deformation. In order to increase visual, spatial and physical quality of the solid model, which is frequently used in reverse engineering, PCs must be filtered to discard noise and outlier. In this paper PC produced from different methods was filtering with Shepard Inverse Distance Weighting method, Gaussian Filtering method, Single Value Decomposition Based Plane Fitting method and Optimization Based Plane Fitting method. Backtracking Search Optimization Algorithm (BSA) was used to fitting plane. Experimental results were compared visually and statistical according to the number of neighborhoods. The results showed that Backtracking Search Optimization based filtering supplied better noise smoothing results than its competitors.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEN, M. A., BEŞDOK, E. (2022). Comparison of point cloud filtering methods with data acquired by photogrammetric method and RGB-D sensors. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 125–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/540687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adams A, Gelfand N, Dolson J & Levoy M (2009). Gaussian kd-trees for fast high-dimensional filtering. ACM SIGGRAPH 2009. https://doi.org/10.1145/1576246.1531327
  2. Aghababaee H, Ferraioli G, Schirinzi G & Pascazio V (2019). Regularization of SAR Tomography for 3-D Height Reconstruction in Urban Areas. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(2), 648-659.
  3. Ahmadabadian A H, Karami A & Yazdan R (2019). An automatic 3D reconstruction system for texture-less objects. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 117, 29-39.
  4. Altuntas C (2015). Integration of point clouds originated from laser scanner and photogrammetric images for visualization of complex details of historical buildings. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(5), 431. Amenta N (1999). The crust algorithm for 3 D surface reconstruction. Symposium on Computational geometry, 423-424. Babak O & Deutsch C V (2009). Statistical approach to inverse distance interpolation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(5), 543-553.
  5. Bellekens B, Spruyt V, Berkvens R & Weyn M (2014). A survey of rigid 3D point cloud registration algorithms. International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, 8, 118-127.
  6. Cai S, Zhang W, Liang X, Wan P, Qi J, Yu S & Shao J (2019). Filtering airborne LiDAR data through complementary cloth simulation and progressive TIN densification filters. Remote Sensing, 11(9), 1037. Civicioglu P (2013). Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(15), 8121-8144.
  7. Civicioglu P, Besdok E, Gunen M A & Atasever U H (2020). Weighted differential evolution algorithm for numerical function optimization: a comparative study with cuckoo search, artificial bee colony, adaptive differential evolution, and backtracking search optimization algorithms. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 3923–3937. Doğan Y & Yakar M (2018). GIS and three-dimensional modeling for cultural heritages. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(2), 50-55.
  8. Fleishman S, Drori I & Cohen-Or D (2003). Bilateral mesh denoising. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 950-953.
  9. Garcia-Garcia A, Orts-Escolano S, Garcia-Rodriguez J & Cazorla M (2018). Interactive 3D object recognition pipeline on mobile GPGPU computing platforms using low-cost RGB-D sensors. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 14(3), 585-604. Golub G H & Reinsch C (1971). S