Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 147 - Sayı: 147

ORIGINAL FINDINGS ON THE ORE-BEARING FACIES OF VOLCANOGENIC MASSIVE SULPHIDE DEPOSITS IN THE EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION (NE TURKEY)

Pages
73–90
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Clastic sulphide textures, sulphide chimney fragments, ferruginous cherts and fossil vent fauna (tube worms) recognised in the Pontide deposits are diagnostic and support the seafloor origin of VMS deposits

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the massive sulphide deposits of the eastern Black Sea region, there are ore facies and ore-bearing sedimentary facies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The former are subdivided into hydrothermal-metasomatic, seafloor hydrothermal, and biological facies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Clastic sulphide textures, sulphide chimney fragments, ferruginous cherts and fossil vent fauna (tube worms) recognised in the Pontide deposits are diagnostic and support the seafloor origin of VMS deposits
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pontides · ore facies · sulphide sandstone

Abstract

In the massive sulphide deposits of the eastern Black Sea region, there are ore facies and ore-bearing sedimentary facies. The former are subdivided into hydrothermal-metasomatic, seafloor hydrothermal, and biological facies. Hydrothermal-metasomatic facies refer to sub-seafloor processes and include network-disseminated, massive vein, and massive lens facies. The precipitation of sulphide minerals within pre-existing volcano-sedimentary rocks occurs largely beneath the seafloor, and these ores form an important component of some deposits. The term seafloor hydrothermal facies refers to sulphide accumulation on the seafloor and is characterised by hydrothermal chimneys and clastic sulphide ores. Clastic sulphide ores can be subdivided into proximal and distal facies. Ore-bearing sedimentary facies are characterised by relatively thin ferruginous chert (exhalite?) beds that occur along the uppermost part of the ore horizon. The biological facies is represented by fossil vent fauna, which are diagnostic for seafloor sulphide formation. The VMS ores of the Eastern Black Sea region have well-preserved facies characteristics, especially in terms of texture and components. Some massive sulphide deposits accumulated via molasse/mass flow on the seafloor, whereas others formed via sub-seafloor replacement processes. Clastic sulphide textures and some sedimentary structures indicate that these deposits formed in a highly active setting. Clastic sulphide textures, sulphide chimney fragments, ferruginous cherts and fossil vent fauna (tube worms) recognised in the Pontide deposits are diagnostic and support the seafloor origin of VMS deposits

🔖

Cite This Article

REVAN, M., GENÇ, Y., MASLENNIKOV, V. V., ÜNLÜ, T., DELİBAŞ, O., HAMZAÇEBİ, S. (2013). ORIGINAL FINDINGS ON THE ORE-BEARING FACIES OF VOLCANOGENIC MASSIVE SULPHIDE DEPOSITS IN THE EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION (NE TURKEY). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 147 - Sayı: 147, 73–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/54061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adamia, S.A., Zakariadze, C.S., Lordkipanidze, M.B. 1977. Evolution of the ancient active continental margin as illustrated by Alpine history of the Caucasus. Geotectonica 11/4, 20-309.
  2. Akın, H. 1979. Geologie Magmatismus und Lagerstaettenbildung im ostpontischen GebirgeTürkei aus der Sicht der Plattentektonik. Geologische Rundschau 68, 253-283.
  3. Akıncı, Ö.T. 1984. The geology and the metallogeny of the Eastern Pontides (Turkey). Dünya Jeoloji Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı 197-198.
  4. Allen, R.L., Weihed, P., the Global VMS Research Project Team, 2002. Global comparison of volcanicassociated massive sulphide districts. In: Blundel, D.J., Neubauer, F. and von Quadt, A. (eds.), The Timing and Location of Major Ore Deposits in an Evolving Orogen. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, No: 204, 13-37.
  5. Barrie, C.T., Hannington, M.D. 1999. Classification of volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits based on host-rock composition. In: Barrie, C.T. and Hannington, M.D. (Eds), Volcanic-associated Massive Sulfide Deposits: Processes and Examples in Modern and Ancient Settings. Rewievs in Economic Geology 8, 1-10.
  6. Buslaev, F.P., Kalegorov, B.A. 1992. The age of sulfide ore formation according to the K/Ar method. In: Prokin, V.A., Seravkin, I.B., Buslaev, F.P. et. Al. (eds). Copper-sulfide deposits of the Urals: conditions of formations. Russian Academy of science, Ural Branch. Ekaterinburg, 186-199 (in Russian). Clark, L.A. 1971. Volcanogenic ores: Comparison of cupriferous pyrite deposits of Cyprus and Japanese Kuruko deposits. Soc. Mining Geologists Japan, Spec. Issue 3, 206-215.
  7. Çamur, M.Z., Güven, İ.H., Er, M. 1996. Geochemical characteristics of the eastern Pontide volcanics, Turkey: An example of multiple volcanic cycles in arc evolution. Turkish Journal Earth Science 5, 123-144.
  8. Doyle, M.G., Allen, L.A. 2003. Subsea-floor replacement in volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits. Ore Geology Reviews 23, 183-222.
  9. Edmond, J.M., Measures, C., Mangum, B., Grant, B., Sclater, F.R., Collier, R., Hudson, A. 1979. On the formation of metal-rich deposits at ridge crests. Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, 46, 19-30.
  10. Eğin, D., Hirst, D.M, Phillips, R. 1979. The petrology and geochemistry of volcanic rocks from the northern Harşit River Area, Pontid volcanic province, northeast Turkey. J. Volcanol. Geothe. Res. 6, 105-123.
  11. Eldridge, S.C., Barton, Jr. P.B., Ohmoto, H. 1983. Mineral textures and their bearing on formation of the Kuroko ore bodies. Economic Geology Mon.