SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 148 - Sayı: 148

NEOGENE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE NORTHERN PART OF KARABURUN PENINSULA

Fikret GÖKTAŞ
Pages
43–61
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Second phase products are emplaced in Aktepe sequence

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The terrigenous Neogene lithology in north of Karaburun peninsula is represented by LowerMiddle Miocene rock units which are cut and bounded by NW-SE trending synthetic faults.Dominant lacustrine sedimentation (Haseki and Hisarcık formations) of Early-Middle Mioceneperiod which was separated by upper and lower regional unconformities, and the Early Miocenemafic volcanism (Karaburun volcanites) were studied within the scope of Karaburun group.Haseki formation which reflects Early Miocene sedimentation begins with fills of alluvial fan ofthe Salman member and is basically formed by algal-biostromal Yeniliman limestone andlacustrine deposits of Aktepe member.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With synsedimentary emplacement of the 1stphaseKaraburun volcanites over Yeniliman limestone platform, the dominant sequence which ismicritic limestone intercalating with diatomite of the Aktepe member was deposited inenvironmental conditions deepening towards shore-face.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Second phase products are emplaced in Aktepe sequence
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karaburun peninsula · Neogene stratigraphy · Early Miocene volcanism

Abstract

The terrigenous Neogene lithology in north of Karaburun peninsula is represented by LowerMiddle Miocene rock units which are cut and bounded by NW-SE trending synthetic faults.Dominant lacustrine sedimentation (Haseki and Hisarcık formations) of Early-Middle Mioceneperiod which was separated by upper and lower regional unconformities, and the Early Miocenemafic volcanism (Karaburun volcanites) were studied within the scope of Karaburun group.Haseki formation which reflects Early Miocene sedimentation begins with fills of alluvial fan ofthe Salman member and is basically formed by algal-biostromal Yeniliman limestone andlacustrine deposits of Aktepe member. With synsedimentary emplacement of the 1stphaseKaraburun volcanites over Yeniliman limestone platform, the dominant sequence which ismicritic limestone intercalating with diatomite of the Aktepe member was deposited inenvironmental conditions deepening towards shore-face. The effectiveness of NW trendingboundary faults which gave rise to 2ndphase of the Karaburun volcanism, shaping the westernedge of Foça depression towards the end of Early Miocene has not changed the dominantdepositional environment, and lacustrine sedimentation has continued with Hisarcık formation.Green and fine clastic shore-face sediments (Karaba¤ları member) of the Hisarcık formationwhich deposited the latest between Early Miocene-Middle Miocene overlie Aktepe sequencewith submarine parallel unconformity. Karaburun volcanism which is represented by highpotassium andesitic products with calc alkaline character (pyroclastics and olivine- phyriclavas) is synchronous with sedimentation of Haseki formation and has two phases. Pyroclasticrocks which are in facies of base-surge, air-fall and ash-fall in lesser amount were emplacedbefore lava eruptions. K/Ar aged, 1stphase products, which are 18.2±1.0 my according to K/Ardating, are in the position of stratigraphical reference level which separates Yenilimanlimestone from Aktepe member. Second phase products are emplaced in Aktepe sequence

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTAŞ, F. (2014). NEOGENE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE NORTHERN PART OF KARABURUN PENINSULA. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 148 - Sayı: 148, 43–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/54050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aras, A., Göktaş, F., Demirhan, M., Demirhan, H., İçöz, S. 1999. Karaburun kilinin stratigrafisi, mineralojisi ve pişme özellikleri. 1. Batı Anadolu Hammadde Kaynakları Sempozyumu (BAKSEM’99), 8-14 Mart 1999, İzmir, 238-247.
  2. Besenecker, H. 1973. Neogen und Qartär der Insel Chios (Ägäis): PhD Thesis. Freien Universität Berlin, 195 s. Bonis, L. De, Koufos, G.D., fien, fi., 1998. Ruminants (BovidaeandTragulidae) from the Middle Miocene (MN5) of the Island of Chios, Aegean Sea (Greece). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen 210, 339-420.
  3. Borsi, J., Ferrara, G., Innocenti, F., Mazzuoli, R., 1972. Geochronology and petrology of recent volcanics in the eastern Aegean Sea (West Anatolia andLesbos Island). Bulletin of Volcanology 36, 473–496.
  4. Bruıjn H. de, Mayda, S., Hoek Ostende L. van den, Kaya, T., Saraç, G., 2006. Small mammals from the Early Miocene of Sabuncubeli (Manisa, SW Anatolia Turkey). Beiträge Paläontologie 30, 57-87.
  5. Çakmakoğlu, B., 2008. Karaburun Yarımadası’nın kuzey kesimindeki killerin stratigrafisi, sedimentolojisi ve ekonomik kullanım olanaklarının araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, Ekonomik Jeoloji Anabilim Dalı, 49 s. İzmir.
  6. Çakmakoğlu, A., Bilgin, Z. R., 2006. Karaburun Yarımadası’nın Neojen öncesi stratigrafisi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi 132, 33-62.
  7. Çakmakoğlu, B., Göktaş, F., Demirhan, M., Helvacı, C., 2013. Karaburun Yarımadası’nın kuzey kesimindeki killerin stratigrafisi, sedimantolojisi ve ekonomik kullanım olanaklarının araştırılması. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 56/1, 39-58.
  8. Dönmez, M.,Türkecan, A., Akçay, A.E., Hakyemez, Y., Sevin, D., 1993.
  9. İzmir ve kuzeyinin jeolojisi, Tersiyer volkanizmasının petrografik ve kimyasal özellikleri. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 10181, 123 s. Ankara (yayımlanmamış). Dunham, R.J., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. Ham W.E. (Ed.). Classification of Carbonate Rocks. American Association Petroleum Geologist-Memoirs 1, 108121. Helvacı, C., Ersoy, Y., Sözbilir, H., Erkül, F., Sümer, Ö., Uzel, B., 2009. Geochemistry and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of Miocene volcanic rocks from the Karaburun Peninsula: Implications for amphibole-bearing lithospheric mantle source, Western Anatolia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research185, 181-202.
  10. Göktaş, F., 2010. Çeşme Yarımadası’ndaki Neojen tortullaşması ve volkanizmasının jeolojik etüdü. Maden Tetkik ve Ara