SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Design Parameters ofa Novel Modified Reciprocating Mechanism

Emre Arabacı
Pages
116–124
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are predicted to be promising for engine de-signers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, displacement, velocity,and acceleration equations were obtained for the mechanism created by modifying the long-stroke reciprocating mecha-nism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the novel mechanism, the ratio of the innergear radius to the pinion gear radius (r2/r1=k) and the ratio of the output gear radius to the pinion gear radius (r0/r1=m) are determined as the basic design parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are predicted to be promising for engine de-signers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, displacement, velocity,and acceleration equations were obtained for the mechanism created by modifying the long-stroke reciprocating mecha-nism. Thus, a novelmechanism has been created. In addition, the effects of the design parameters were examined and the results obtained were compared with the conventional crank-connecting rod mechanism. While the crank radius (r) and connecting rod length (L), which are the main design parameters ofthe conven-tional crank-connecting rod mechanism, are fixed, the design parameters of the novelmechanism are changed and the effects of these design parameters on the velocityand acceleration characteristics are examined. For the novel mechanism, the ratio of the innergear radius to the pinion gear radius (r2/r1=k) and the ratio of the output gear radius to the pinion gear radius (r0/r1=m) are determined as the basic design parameters. Accordingly, by decreasing kand increasing m, it was seen that the connecting rod angle, mean piston velocity and meanpiston accel-eration were decreased. The correct choice of kand mshows that the novelmech-anism can be made more advantageous compared to the conventional crank-con-necting rod mechanism. The results are predicted to be promising for engine de-signers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arabacı, E. (2022). Analysis of Design Parameters ofa Novel Modified Reciprocating Mechanism. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 116–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/540497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ceccarelli, M. (Ed.). (2007). Distinguished figures in mechanism and machine science: Their contributions and legacies. Springer Science & Business Media
  2. Zhang, C., & Yang, J. (2020). Ancient Machines. In A History of Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore
  3. Van Basshuysen, R., & Schäfer, F. (2004). Internal combustion engine handbook-basics, components, systems and perspectives (Vol. 345)
  4. Rangwala, A. S., Amromin, E. L., & Kovinskaya, S. (2001). Reciprocating machinery dynamics: design and analysis. Appl. Mech. Rev., 54(5), B80-B81
  5. Atkinson, J. (1887). U.S. Patent No. 367,496. England: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  6. Yamada, Y. (2003). U.S. Patent No. 6,820,577. Tokyo: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  7. Catalano, G. (2017). WPO Patent No WO 2017/001986 Al. Lugano, China: World Intellectual Property Organization
  8. Gultekin, E., & Cinar, C. (2019). A thermodynamic comparison of rhombic-drive and slider–crank mechanisms for a twostroke SI engine. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 1-18
  9. Yılmaz, E., Polat, S., Solmaz, H., Aksoy, F., & Çınar, C. Buji ile ateşlemeli tek silindirli bir motorda krank-biyel ve rhombic hareket mekanizmalarının termodinamik olarak karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(2), 595-606. [10]Kopystanski, G. (1999). U.S. Patent No. 5,934,243. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [11]Nelson, C. D. (1985). U.S. Patent No. 4,517,931. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [12]Hiyoshi, R., Nakamura, K., & Sugita, T. (2018). U.S. Patent No. 10,001,056. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [13]Yang, S., & Lin, J. (2018). A theoretical study of the mechanism with variable compression ratio and expansion ratio. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 46(3), 267- 284. [14]Hiyoshi, R., Ushijima, K., Yasuda, Y., & Moteki, K. (2005). U.S. Patent No. 6,920,847. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [15]De Witt, C. (1945). U.S. Patent No. 2,366,237. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [16]B2 Raffaele, P. R., & Raffaele, M. J. (2007). U.S. Patent No. 7,210,397. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [17]Close, W. H., Szydlowski, W., & Downton, C. (1994). Perfect engine balance via collins Scotch Yoke technology (No. 941039). SAE Technical Paper. [18]Vaux, M. A., & Denner, T. R. (1994). U.S. Patent No. 5,331,926. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Tradem