Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Performance Comparison of Propylene Glycol-Water and Ethylene Glycol-Water Mixtures as Engine Coolants in a Flat-Tube Automobile Radiator

Pages
147–156
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that water yielded the highest radiator heat rejection rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at evaluating and comparing the thermal performance of five different engine coolants employed in an experimental engine cooling system with a flat-tube louvered-fin automobile radiator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The system could maintain the temperatures of the air and coolant at the radiator inlet, the speed of the air and flow rate of the coolant at the required values during the tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that water yielded the highest radiator heat rejection rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Automobile · Coolant · Engine cooling

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating and comparing the thermal performance of five different engine coolants employed in an experimental engine cooling system with a flat-tube louvered-fin automobile radiator. For this purpose, a PLC-controlled test system was set up. The system could maintain the temperatures of the air and coolant at the radiator inlet, the speed of the air and flow rate of the coolant at the required values during the tests. The tested coolants were pure wa-ter, 30/70 ethylene glycol (EG)/water, 30/70 propylene glycol (PG)/water, 50/50 EG/water and 50/50 PG/water mixtures. In all tests, the coolant temperature at the radiator inlet was kept at 90°C, while the coolant flow rate was varied between 0.10–0.25 l/s with 0.05 l/s increments. Furthermore, the air temperature at the ra-diator inlet was kept at 25, 30 and 35°C, and the air speed passing over the radia-tor was varied between 1–4 m/s with 1 m/s increments. The thermal performance of the radiator was evaluated by locating the measured coolant flow rate and coolant inlet/outlet temperatures into the conservation of energy equation. It was found that water yielded the highest radiator heat rejection rates. Compared with water, 30/70 EG/water, 50/50 EG/water, 30/70 PG/water, 50/50 PG/water mix-tures yielded on average 3.50%, 7.89%, 8.28%, 11.46% lower radiator heat rejec-tion rates, respectively. Since PG has some advantages over EG such as lower cost and toxicity, PG mixtures can be employed as antifreeze instead of EG mix-tures in expense of a slight decrease in the thermal performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDEM, A., HOŞÖZ, M., KEKLİK, E. (2022). Performance Comparison of Propylene Glycol-Water and Ethylene Glycol-Water Mixtures as Engine Coolants in a Flat-Tube Automobile Radiator. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 147–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/540476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rajput RK. Internal combustion engine. 2nd ed. India: Laxmi Publications Ltd.; 2007. Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc.; 1998.
  2. Subhedar DG, Ramani BM, Gupta A. Experimental investigation of heat transfer potential of Al2 O3/water-mono ethylene glycol nanofluids as a car radiator coolant. Case Stud in Therm Eng. 2018;11:26–34. Pérez-Tavernier J, Vallejo JP, Cabaleiro D, Fernández-Seara J, Lugo L. Heat transfer performance of a nano-enhanced propylene glycol:water mixture. Int J of Therm Sci. 2019;139:413–423.
  3. Sahoo RR, Ghosh P, Sarkar J. Energy and exergy comparisons of water based optimum brines as coolants for rectangular fin automotive radiator. Int J of Heat and Mass Transf. 2017;105:690–696.
  4. Gollin M, Bjork D. Comparative performance of ethylene glycol/water and propylene glycol/water coolants in automobile radiators. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1996.
  5. Soylu S, Atmaca İ, Asiltürk M, Doğan A. Improving heat transfer performance of an automobile radiator using Cu Ag doped TiO2 based nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;157. Kumar A, Hassan MA, Chand P. Heat transport in nanofluid coolant car radiator with louvered fins. Powder Technol. 2020;376:631–642.
  6. Rai P, Kumar A, Yadav Anshul. Experimental investigation of heat transfer augmentation in automobile radiator using magnesium oxide/distilled water-ethylene glycol based nanofluid. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;24:1525–32.
  7. Juniour LCC, Nogueira É. Influence of the coolant flow containing silver nanoparticles (Ag) from an aqueous solution based on ethylene glycol (EG50%) on the thermal-hydraulic performance of an automotive radiator. World J of Nano Sci and Eng. 2020;10:10–26.
  8. Sahoo RR, Ganosh P, Sarkar J. Performance comparison of various coolants for louvered fin tube automotive radiator. Therm Sci 2017;21(6B):2871–81.
  9. Habibian SH, Abolmaali AM, Afshin H. Numerical investigation of the effects of fin shape, antifreeze and nanoparticles on the performance of compact finned-tube heat exchangers for automobile radiator. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;133:248–260.
  10. Scott LF, Weir TW. Comparing the Performance of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol coolants in heavy duty vehicles. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1996.
  11. Juger JJ, Crook RF. Heat transfer performance of propylene glycol versus ethylene glycol coolant solutions in laboratory testing. In: SAE Technical Papers. 1999.
  12. Greaney JP, Brunner K, Coburn CR. Low temperature performance of propylene glycol engine coolant. SAE Tra