Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

GIS based assessment of road traffic noise in and around of schools situated near busy roadside

Pages
27–38
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It may therefore be safely concluded that school children in the subject schools being exposed to the same levels of hazard as the residents in the immediate vicinity were probably suffering from similar problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted of traffic noise which affected on urban traffic noise of selected roadside school as acoustic comfort for selected locations (near school buildings) of Burdwan town and the ambient noise was recorded during four different time periods (early morning, late morning, afternoon and evening).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The different acoustic descriptor such as Leq, L90, L50, L10, noise climate (NC), traffic noise index (TNI) and noise pollution level (NPL) were evaluated, while a community study was also simultaneously conducted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It may therefore be safely concluded that school children in the subject schools being exposed to the same levels of hazard as the residents in the immediate vicinity were probably suffering from similar problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Traffic Noise · Noise Parameter · GIS-IDW

Abstract

This study was conducted of traffic noise which affected on urban traffic noise of selected roadside school as acoustic comfort for selected locations (near school buildings) of Burdwan town and the ambient noise was recorded during four different time periods (early morning, late morning, afternoon and evening). Geographical Information System (GIS) based Inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolating technique was used to identify the vulnerability of noise pollution in mixed areas of schools. The different acoustic descriptor such as Leq, L90, L50, L10, noise climate (NC), traffic noise index (TNI) and noise pollution level (NPL) were evaluated, while a community study was also simultaneously conducted. The results revealed that the average Leq, L90, L50, L10 varied from 76.5 dB (A) to 78.6 dB (A), 58.2 dB (A) to 60 dB (A), 65.6 (A) to 67.3 dB (A) and 86.6 (A) to 94.5 dB (A), respectively. It was observed that the noise climate reached its peak in the afternoon (35.7 ± dB (A)) and was the lowest in the evening (27.8 ± dB (A)). The health data indicated that about 71% and 8% of the inhabitants near the schools were suffering from irritation and sleeping problems respectively. The similar correlation study revealed that Leq (r = 0.484, p < 0.679), L90 (r = 0.871, p < 0.327), and L50 (r = 0.507, p < 0.662) were strongly correlated with sleep disturbance. It may therefore be safely concluded that school children in the subject schools being exposed to the same levels of hazard as the residents in the immediate vicinity were probably suffering from similar problems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mondal, N. K., Kundu, S., Sen, K. (2022). GIS based assessment of road traffic noise in and around of schools situated near busy roadside. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 27–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/540410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Thakre C, Laxmi V, Vijay R, Killedar DJ, Kumar R. Traffic noise prediction model of an Indian road: an increased scenario of vehicles and honking. Environmental Science and Pollution Resesarch. 2020; 27: 38311-38320
  2. Mondal NK, Ghatak B. Vulnerability of school children exposed to traffic noise. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering. 2014; 3(2): 45-52
  3. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. No. 14 of 1981, [29/03/1981]-The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, amended 1987.
  4. Amoatey P, Omidvarbona H, Baawain MS, Al-Mayahi A, Al-Mamun A, Al-Harthy I. Exposure assessment to road traffic noise levels and health effects in an arid urban area. Environmental Science and Pollution Resesarch. 2020; 27: 35051–35064. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09785-y [5] Pignier N. The impact of traffic noise on economy and environment: a short literature study. 2015; ISBN 998-91-7595-615-2 kth Royal Institute of Technology
  5. European Environmental Agency. Noise in Europe EEA Report No. 10/2014, 2014; ISSN 1977-8449
  6. Woolner P, Hall E. Noise in Schools: A Holistic Approach to the Issue. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010; 7(8): 3255–3269. doi:10.3390/ijerph7083255 [8] Doygun H, Kuşat GD. Analysing and mapping spatial and temporal dynamics of urban traffic noise pollution: a case study in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2008; 142(1-3): 65–72. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-9908-7 [9] Stansfeld S, Berglund B, Clark C, Lopez-Barrio I, Fischer P, Öhrström E, Haines MM, Head J, Hygge S, van Kamp I, Berry B. Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: a cross-national study. The Lancet. 2005; 365(9475): 1942–1949. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66660-3 [10] World Health Organization. Noise: Facts and Figures. 2011; Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/environment-and health/noise/facts-and-figures
  7. Mondal NK. Vehicle noise interference and its impact on the community. International Journal of Current Science. 2013; 5: 161-169
  8. Shield BM, Dockrell JE. The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123(1): 133–144. doi:10.1121/1.2812596 [13] Sanz SA, García AM, García A. Road traffic noise around schools: a risk for pupil’s performance? Internatio