Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Are We Measuring Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computers in Detail?: Adaptation of a Questionnaire into Turkish Culture

Pages
166–181
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the translated instrument (Cronbach’s Alpha: .94) included eight factors and consisted of 42 items under these factors, which were consistent with the original instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Teachers’ perceptions of computers play an important role in integrating computers into education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These instruments have three to four factors (e.g., computer importance, computer enjoyment, computer confidence) and 18 to 26 items under these factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the translated instrument (Cronbach’s Alpha: .94) included eight factors and consisted of 42 items under these factors, which were consistent with the original instrument.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Computer Attitude · Teachers · Teacher Candidates

Abstract

Teachers’ perceptions of computers play an important role in integrating computers into education. The related literature includes studies developing or adapting a survey instrument in Turkish culture measuring teachers’ attitudes toward computers. These instruments have three to four factors (e.g., computer importance, computer enjoyment, computer confidence) and 18 to 26 items under these factors. The purpose of the present study is to adapt a more detailed and stronger survey questionnaire measuring more dimensions related to teachers’ attitudes. The source instrument was developed by Christensen and Kenzek (2009) and called Teachers’ Attitudes toward Computers (TAC). It has nine factors with 51 items. Before testing the instrument, the interaction (e-mail) factor was taken out because of the cultural differences. The reliability and validity testing of the translated instrument was completed with 273 teachers’ candidates in a Faculty of Education in Turkey. The results showed that the translated instrument (Cronbach’s Alpha: .94) included eight factors and consisted of 42 items under these factors, which were consistent with the original instrument. These factors were: Interest (α: .83), Comfort (α: .90), Accommodation (α: .87), Concern (α: .79), Utility (α: .90), Perception (α: .89), Absorption (α: .84), and Significance (α: .83). Additionally, the confirmatory factor analysis result for the model with eight factors was: RMSEA=0.050, χ2/df=1.69, RMR=0.075, SRMR=0.057, GFI= 0.81, AGFI= 0.78, NFI= 0.94, NNFI=0.97, CFI=0.97, IFI= 0.97. Accordingly, as a reliable, valid and stronger instrument, the adapted survey instrument can be suggested for the use in Turkish academic studies.

Özet

Teachers’ perceptions of computers play an important role in integrating computers into education. The related literature includes studies developing or adapting a survey instrument in Turkish culture measuring teachers’ attitudes toward computers. These instruments have three to four factors (e.g., computer importance, computer enjoyment, computer confidence) and 18 to 26 items under these factors. The purpose of the present study is to adapt a more detailed and stronger survey questionnaire measuring more dimensions related to teachers’ attitudes. The source instrument was developed by Christensen and Kenzek (2009) and called Teachers’ Attitudes toward Computers (TAC). It has nine factors with 51 items. Before testing the instrument, the interaction (e-mail) factor was taken out because of the cultural differences. The reliability and validity testing of the translated instrument was completed with 273 teachers’ candidates in a Faculty of Education in Turkey. The results showed that the translated instrument (Cronbach’s Alpha: .94) included eight factors and consisted of 42 items under these factors, which were consistent with the original instrument. These factors were: Interest (α: .83), Comfort (α: .90), Accommodation (α: .87), Concern (α: .79), Utility (α: .90), Perception (α: .89), Absorption (α: .84), and Significance (α: .83). Additionally, the confirmatory factor analysis result for the model with eight factors was: RMSEA=0.050, χ2/df=1.69, RMR=0.075, SRMR=0.057, GFI= 0.81, AGFI= 0.78, NFI= 0.94, NNFI=0.97, CFI=0.97, IFI= 0.97. Accordingly, as a reliable, valid and stronger instrument, the adapted survey instrument can be suggested for the use in Turkish academic studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, Ö., GÜNBAŞ, N. (2022). Are We Measuring Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computers in Detail?: Adaptation of a Questionnaire into Turkish Culture. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 166–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/540253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Altun, T. (2011). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi: Trabzon ili örneği. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 69-86.
  2. Aşkar, P. & Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  3. Aypay, A. & Özbaşı, D. (2008). Öğretmenlerin bilgisayara karşı tutumlarının incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 55, 339-362.
  4. Bahar, E. & Kaya, F. (2013). Meslek yüksekokulu sosyal programlar öğrencilerinin bilgi teknolojileri kullanımlarına yönelik tutumları. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3(1), 70-79.
  5. Bahar, H. H., Uludağ, E. & Kaplan, K. (2009). An investigation of the computer and internet attitudes on primary school teachers from Kars province. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 67-83.
  6. Başol, G., & Çevik, V. (2006). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi öğretim elemanları ve öğrencilerinin bilgisayara yönelik tutumları ile internet kullanım alışkanlıklarının karşılaştırılması VII. Ulusal Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, 1, 127-131.
  7. Gazi Üniversitesi,
  8. Ankara.
  9. Berberoğlu, G. & Çalıkoğlu, G. (1991). Türkçe bilgisayar tutum ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 841-845.
  10. Bindak, R. & Çelik, H. C. (2006). Öğretmenler İçin Bilgisayar Tutum Ölçeğinin Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 22, 38-42.
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara:
  12. PegemA Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (10th Ed). Ankara:
  13. PegemA Yayıncılık. Christensen, R. W. & Knezek, G. A. (2009). Construct validity for the teachers’ attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 143-155.
  14. Cüre, F. & Özdener, N. (2008). Öğretmenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri (BİT) uygulama başarıları ve BİT’e yönelik tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 41-53.
  15. Çavuş, H. & Gökdaş, İ. (2006). Eğitim Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin internetten yararlanma nedenleri ve kazanımları. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 56-78.
  16. Çelik, H. C. & Bindak, R. (2005). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğ