Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Modeling Course Achievements of Elementary Education Teacher Candidates with Artificial Neural Networks

Pages
491–509
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fact that the artificial neural network performance in this study was R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education I course, and R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education II course shows that the network performance overlaps with the findings obtained from the related studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to predict elementary education teacher candidates’ achievements in “Science and Technology Education I and II” courses by using artificial neural networks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the data set used in this study, variables of gender, type of education, field of study in high school and transcript information of 14 courses including end-of-term letter grades were collected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fact that the artificial neural network performance in this study was R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education I course, and R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education II course shows that the network performance overlaps with the findings obtained from the related studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elementary Education · Science and Technology Teaching · Data Mining

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to predict elementary education teacher candidates’ achievements in “Science and Technology Education I and II” courses by using artificial neural networks. It was also aimed to show the independent variables importance in the prediction. In the data set used in this study, variables of gender, type of education, field of study in high school and transcript information of 14 courses including end-of-term letter grades were collected. The fact that the artificial neural network performance in this study was R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education I course, and R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education II course shows that the network performance overlaps with the findings obtained from the related studies.

Özet

In this study, it was aimed to predict elementary education teacher candidates’ achievements in “Science and Technology Education I and II” courses by using artificial neural networks. It was also aimed to show the independent variables importance in the prediction. In the data set used in this study, variables of gender, type of education, field of study in high school and transcript information of 14 courses including end-of-term letter grades were collected. The fact that the artificial neural network performance in this study was R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education I course, and R=0.84 for the Science and Technology Education II course shows that the network performance overlaps with the findings obtained from the related studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akgün, E., DEMİR, M. (2022). Modeling Course Achievements of Elementary Education Teacher Candidates with Artificial Neural Networks. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 491–509. https://ajindex.com/articles/540230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Açıl, Ü. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarıları ile KPSS puanları arasındaki ilişkinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between academic success of teacher candidates and civil servant selection examination (KPSS) scores, in terms of different variables (Master’s Thesis)]. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Hatay. Adıyaman, F. (2007). Talep tahmininde yapay sinir ağlarının kullanılması [Sales forecasting using artifical neural networks (Master’s Thesis)]. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  2. Ahn, B. S., Cho, S. S., & Kim, C. Y. (2000). The integrated methodology of rough set theory and artificial neural network for business failure prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 18(2), 65-74. doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(99)00053-6
  3. Alam, M., & Briggs, A. (2011). Artificial neural network meta-models in cost-effectiveness analysis of intensive blood-glucose control: A case study applied to the UK prospective diabetes study (Ukpds) individual patient outcome simulation model. Value in Health, 14(7), 234-235.
  4. Anemone, R., Emerson, C., & Conroy, G. (2011). Finding fossils in new ways: An artificial neural network approach to predicting the location of productive fossil localities. Evol Anthropol, 20(5), 169-180. doi:10.1002/evan.20324 Anıl, D. (2009). Uluslararası öğrenci başarılarını değerlendirme programı (PISA)’nda Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin fen bilimleri başarılarını etkileyen faktörler [Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) in Turkey]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 87-100.
  5. Arbib, M. A. (1987). Brains, machines, and mathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag. Arbib, M. A. (2003). The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT press. Ayık, Y. Z., Özdemir, A. ve Yavuz, U. (2007). Lise türü ve lise mezuniyet başarısının kazanılan fakülte ile ilişkisinin veri madenciliği tekniği ile analizi [An analysis of the correlation between the type of high school and high school graduation score and university placement examination using data mining technique.]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 441-454.
  6. Azadeh, A., Saberi, M., & Anvari, M. (2011). An integrated artificial neural network fuzzy C-means-normalization algorithm for performance assessment of decision-making units: The cases of auto industry and power plant. Compu