Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Safe Learning Environment Perception Scale (SLEPS): A Validity and Reliability Study

Pages
444–460
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, the SLEPS has potential applicability both at the lower and upper secondary schools (public and private) and at the educational centers for the gifted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate a measurement scale on students’ perception of a psychologically safe learning environment in the Turkish context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results yielded a strong content validity and clarity of the items.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, the SLEPS has potential applicability both at the lower and upper secondary schools (public and private) and at the educational centers for the gifted.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psychological safety · Emotional safety · Classroom environment

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate a measurement scale on students’ perception of a psychologically safe learning environment in the Turkish context. Primarily, the scale items underwent two rounds of expert review. Then, a series of item elimination or revisions were performed to improve their relevance to the content domain and their comprehensibility for the target group according to the CVI and modified kappa statistics. The results yielded a strong content validity and clarity of the items. Then, the exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis were performed based on the data from 556 secondary school students (grade 5-8), which suggested a three-factor solution. The KMO was 0.942 > 0.50 with significant Bartlett test values, x2(496) = 8295.592, p < 0.001 and the explained total variance was 50.622 %. Each item had a factor loading of > 0.58 with > 0.40 common correlations. To validate this structure, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted based on the data from a different group of students (N = 339). The goodness of fit indices, factor loadings, and the t statistics supported a good-fitting measurement model, x2(N = 339) = 925.29, df = 461, p < 0.001; x2/df = 2, NFI = 0.94, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.069, RMSEA = 0.055. The convergent and discriminant validity were also supported. In general, the SLEPS has potential applicability both at the lower and upper secondary schools (public and private) and at the educational centers for the gifted.

Özet

The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate a measurement scale on students’ perception of a psychologically safe learning environment in the Turkish context. Primarily, the scale items underwent two rounds of expert review. Then, a series of item elimination or revisions were performed to improve their relevance to the content domain and their comprehensibility for the target group according to the CVI and modified kappa statistics. The results yielded a strong content validity and clarity of the items. Then, the exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis were performed based on the data from 556 secondary school students (grade 5-8), which suggested a three-factor solution. The KMO was 0.942 > 0.50 with significant Bartlett test values, x2(496) = 8295.592, p < 0.001 and the explained total variance was 50.622 %. Each item had a factor loading of > 0.58 with > 0.40 common correlations. To validate this structure, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted based on the data from a different group of students (N = 339). The goodness of fit indices, factor loadings, and the t statistics supported a good-fitting measurement model, x2(N = 339) = 925.29, df = 461, p < 0.001; x2/df = 2, NFI = 0.94, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.069, RMSEA = 0.055. The convergent and discriminant validity were also supported. In general, the SLEPS has potential applicability both at the lower and upper secondary schools (public and private) and at the educational centers for the gifted.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKUŞ, F., HAİDARİ, S. M. (2022). Safe Learning Environment Perception Scale (SLEPS): A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 444–460. https://ajindex.com/articles/540162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aldrich, J. O. & Cunningham, J. B. (2016). Using IBM® SPSS Statistics (2nd ed.). USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Beamon, G. W. (1993). Is Your Classroom “Safe” for Thinking? Introducing an Observation Instrument to Assess Classroom Climate and Teacher Questioning Strategies. Research in Middle Level Education, 17(1), 91-110.
  2. Beamon, G. W. (2001). Making Classroom “Safe” for Adolescent Learning. Paper Presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Dallas, Texas. Boostrom, R. (1998). ‘Safe spaces’: reflections on an educational metaphor. Curriculum Studies, 30(4), 397-408).
  3. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed). USA: The Guilford Press.
  4. Capern, T. & Hammond, L. (2014). Establishing Positive Relationships with Secondary Gifted Students and Students with Emotional/Behavioural Disorders: Giving These Diverse Learners What They Need. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 46-67. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.5 Çokluk, Ö. & Koçak, D. (2016) Using Horn’s Parallel Analysis Method in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Determining the Number of Factors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16, 537-551. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328 Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed.). Oriental Press, Dubai: SAGE Publication. Foldy, E. R., Rivard, P. and Buckley, T. R. (2009).
  5. Power, Safety, and Learning in Racially Diverse Groups. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 25–41.
  6. Frisby, B. N., Berger, E., Burchett, M., Herovic, E. & Strawser, M. G. (2014). Participation Apprehensive Students: The Influence of Face Support and Instructor– Student Rapport on Classroom Participation. Communication Education, 63, 105 - 123. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.881516 Gayle, B. M., Cortez, D. & Preiss, R. W. (2013).
  7. Safe Spaces, Difficult Dialogues, and Critical Thinking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070205 Gillen, A., Wright, A. & Spink, L. (2011). Student perceptions of a positive climate for learning: a case study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27, 65 - 82. doi:10.1080/02667363.2011.549355 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). USA: Pearson Education Limited. Holley, L. C. & Steiner, S. (2005) Safe Space: Student Perspectives on Classroom Environment, Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 49-64.
  8. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (199