Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Development of Language Awareness Scale regarding Daily Life

Pages
535–548
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on these findings, it can be said that the scale can be used in a valid and reliable way to measure students' language awareness about daily life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to develop the language awareness scale regarding daily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 606 undergraduate students studying at a university in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on these findings, it can be said that the scale can be used in a valid and reliable way to measure students' language awareness about daily life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turkish Consciousness · Language Awareness · Social Media

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop the language awareness scale regarding daily life. The study group consisted of 606 undergraduate students studying at a university in Istanbul. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used in the study. EFA result indicates that the scale consists of 17 items and 4 factors and 67% of the total variance is explained. Factors were named as Individual Awareness, Social Media Awareness, Awareness Regarding Daily Life and Awareness in the Mass Media. As a result of the CFA, it was determined that the scale had 17 items and the fit indices of the structure were sufficient (χ2 / sd = 2.54, RMSEA = 069, SRMR =.07). Item-total correlations of the scale were found to range between 79 and 89. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be as 86. Based on these findings, it can be said that the scale can be used in a valid and reliable way to measure students' language awareness about daily life.

Özet

The aim of this study is to develop the language awareness scale regarding daily life. The study group consisted of 606 undergraduate students studying at a university in Istanbul. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used in the study. EFA result indicates that the scale consists of 17 items and 4 factors and 67% of the total variance is explained. Factors were named as Individual Awareness, Social Media Awareness, Awareness Regarding Daily Life and Awareness in the Mass Media. As a result of the CFA, it was determined that the scale had 17 items and the fit indices of the structure were sufficient (χ2 / sd = 2.54, RMSEA = 069, SRMR =.07). Item-total correlations of the scale were found to range between 79 and 89. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be as 86. Based on these findings, it can be said that the scale can be used in a valid and reliable way to measure students' language awareness about daily life.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erol, M., Karakaya, I. (2022). Development of Language Awareness Scale regarding Daily Life. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 535–548. https://ajindex.com/articles/540139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Ağca, H. (2001). Türk dili. Ankara:
  2. Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. Akalın, Ş. H. (2000). Bilişim çağı ve Türkçenin sorunları. Erişim Tarihi 21 Aralık 2018, http://turkoloji,cu,edu,tr/DIL%20SORUNLARI/03.php
  3. Aktaş, E., & Şentürk, L. (2014). Türkçe eğitiminde kuramsal ve uygulamalı çalışmalar, Sosyal medyada Türkçenin kullanımı üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Ali, S. (2011). Critical Language awareness in pedagogic context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p28
  5. Alpay, N. (2015). Türkçe sorunları kılavuzu. İstanbul:
  6. Metis Yayıncılık. Alyılmaz, C. (2010). Türkçenin öğretiminin sorunları. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 5(3), 729-749. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.1629
  7. Aslan, A, & Kılıç, Y. (2012). Türkçe öğretmenleri ile öğretmen adaylarının Türkçe bilinç düzeyleri (Ağrı ili Örneklemi). Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7(4), 799-806. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4078
  8. Bağcı-Ayrancı, B. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarına göre Türkçenin güncel sorunları. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(2), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3550
  9. Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde spss ile veri analizi. Bursa: Ezgi Kitapevi. Buran, A. (2006). Yozlaşma dilin kullanımıyla ilgilidir” konulu röportaj. Bizim Külliye Dergisi, 30, 40-44.
  10. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2003). Dil farkındalığı ve işlevsel dil kullanımı bağlamında anadilimiz: gözlemler, öneriler. Cumhuriyetimizin 80, Yılında Türkçemiz, Ankara: Ankara Ticaret Odası ve Anadolu Çağdaş Eğitim Vakfı, 19-26.
  11. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2006). Toplumsal gerçeklik ve dil. İstanbul:
  12. Multilingual Yayınları.
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (23. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Şekercioğlu, Ç., & Çokluk, Ö. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara:
  14. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Carter, R. (2003). Language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(1), 64-65.
  15. Demir, C., & Yapıcı, M. (2007). Ana dili olarak Türkçenin öğretimi ve sorunları. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 177-192.
  16. Demir, N., & Yılmaz, E. (2009). Türk dili. Ankara:
  17. Grafiker Yayınları.
  18. Ellis, E, M. (2012). Language awareness and its relevance to TESOL. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 7, 1-23.
  19. Erdoğan, T., & Gö