Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Measurement Invariance of Science Motivation and Self- Efficacy Model: PISA 2015 Turkey Sample

Pages
207–222
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, the researchmodel could provide complete measurement invariance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Measurement invariance analyses are carried out in order to findevidence for the structural validity of the measurement tools used in the field ofeducational sciences and psychology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this research is to examinethe measurement invariance of Science Motivation and Self-Efficacy Modelconstructed by Instrumental Motivation to Learn Science and Science Self-Efficacy subscales found in the PISA 2015 Student Questionnaire across differentgroups in the Turkish sample survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, the researchmodel could provide complete measurement invariance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Measurement invariance analyses are carried out in order to findevidence for the structural validity of the measurement tools used in the field ofeducational sciences and psychology. The purpose of this research is to examinethe measurement invariance of Science Motivation and Self-Efficacy Modelconstructed by Instrumental Motivation to Learn Science and Science Self-Efficacy subscales found in the PISA 2015 Student Questionnaire across differentgroups in the Turkish sample survey. The analysis was carried out with the dataobtained from 4583 students that met the analysis assumptions. The measurementinvariance of the model in terms of gender and statistical regional groups wasexamined by the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. Firstly, the datawas examined to determine whether the assumptions for the analyses were met.Then, measurement models were verified by performing confirmatory factoranalysis (CFA). The measurement invariance across genders and statistical regionswas tested by multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). UnweightedLeast Squares (ULS) method was used as the estimation method in CFA andMGCFA stages. In order to make final decisions about the stage of measurementinvariance models hold, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) was used. The results of thestudy show that the research model ensures all stages of invariance across gendergroups and regions. Science Motivation and Self-Efficacy Model illustrates that itis valid to make comparisons between scores of male and female students orstudents from different regions of Turkey. According to the findings, the researchmodel could provide complete measurement invariance.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABASAKAL, K. A., GÜNGÖR, M. (2022). Investigation of Measurement Invariance of Science Motivation and Self- Efficacy Model: PISA 2015 Turkey Sample. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 207–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/540122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ağaç, G., & Masal, E. (2015). An investigation of the relation between 8th grade students’ beliefs, abstract thought and achievement; The case of mathematics. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 134-144.
  2. Akyıldız, M. (2009). PIRLS 2001 testinin yapı geçerliliğinin ülkelerarası karşılaştırılması [The comparison of construct validities of the PIRLS 2001 test between countries]. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education, 6(1), 18-47.
  3. Alivernini, F. (2011). Measurement invariance of a reading literacy scale in the Italian context: A psychometric analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 436-441.
  4. Anderson, C. J., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 411-423.
  5. Asil, M., & Gelbal, S. (2012). PISA öğrenci anketinin kültürler arası eşdeğerliği [Cross-cultural equivalence of the PISA student questionnaire]. Education and Science, 37(166), 236- 249. Ayvallı, M., & Biçak, B. (2018). An investigation into the measurement invariance of PISA 2012 mathematical literacy test. European Journal of Education Studies, 4 (11), 39-58.
  6. Bakan Kalaycıoğlu, D. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1-11.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Başusta, B. N. (2010). Ölçme eşdeğerliği [Measurement equivalence]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 1(2), 58-64.
  8. Başusta, B. N., & Gelbal, S. (2015). Gruplararası karşılaştırmalarda ölçme değişmezliğinin test edilmesi: PISA anketi örneği [Examination of measurement invariance at groups’ comparisons: A study on PISA student questionnaire]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 80-90.
  9. Batyra, A. (2017). Gender gaps in student achievement in Turkey: Evidence from Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. Education Reform Initiative & Aydın Doğan Foundation. Bıkmaz, H. F. (2002). Fen öğretiminde öz-yeterlik inancı ölçeği [Self-efficacy belief instrument in science teaching]. Educational Sciences & Practice, 1(2), 197-210.
  10. Bircan, H., & Sungur, S. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in science achievement. Science Education International, 27(4), 509-529.
  11. Boyd, L. B., Dooley, E. K., & Felton, S