SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Establishing survey validity: A practical guide

William W. COBERN
Betty AJ ADAMS
Pages
404–419
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The guide, furthermore, includes references to important handbooks for researchers needing further information.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:What follows is a practical guide for establishing the validity of a survey for research purposes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The motivation for providing this guide is our observation that researchers, not necessarily being survey researchers per se, but wanting to use a survey method, lack a concise resource on validity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The guide, furthermore, includes references to important handbooks for researchers needing further information.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pretesting · Cognitive interviews · Reliability

Abstract

What follows is a practical guide for establishing the validity of a survey for research purposes. The motivation for providing this guide is our observation that researchers, not necessarily being survey researchers per se, but wanting to use a survey method, lack a concise resource on validity. There is far more to know about surveys and survey construction than what this guide provides; and this guide should only be used as a starting point. However, for the needs of many researchers, this guide provides sufficient, basic information on survey validity. The guide, furthermore, includes references to important handbooks for researchers needing further information.

Özet

What follows is a practical guide for establishing the validity of a survey for research purposes. The motivation for providing this guide is our observation that researchers, not necessarily being survey researchers per se, but wanting to use a survey method, lack a concise resource on validity. There is far more to know about surveys and survey construction than what this guide provides; and this guide should only be used as a starting point. However, for the needs of many researchers, this guide provides sufficient, basic information on survey validity. The guide, furthermore, includes references to important handbooks for researchers needing further information.

🔖

Cite This Article

COBERN, W. W., ADAMS, B. A. (2022). Establishing survey validity: A practical guide. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 404–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/540120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. American Education Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: An interpretive study of 16 ninth graders' conceptualizations of nature. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Cobern, W. W., & Adams, B. A. (2020). When interviewing: how many is enough? International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 73 79. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.693217
  3. Cobern, W. W., Adams, B. A. J., Pleasants, B. A.-S., Bentley, A., & Kagumba, R. E. (2019, March 31-April 3, 2019). Investigating the potential for unanticipated consequences of teaching the tentative nature of science. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD. Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of nature: An interpretive study of 16 ninth graders' everyday thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541-564.
  4. Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D. G., Adams, B., Skjold, B., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of Science Teaching Tests: Formative Assessments of Science Teaching Orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265-2288. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/RE95xZ
  5. Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://echo.edres.org:8080/irt/baker/final.pdf
  6. Bhat, A. (2019). Top 7 Demographic survey questions for questionnaire. Retrieved from https://www.questionpro.com/blog/demographic-survey-questions/
  7. Blair, J., & Conrad, F. G. (2011). Sample size for cognitive interview pretesting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 636-658. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr035
  8. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149-149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
  9. Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Wh