Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Learning Effect of Corpora on Strong and Weak Collocations: Implications for Corpus-Based Assessment of Collocation Competence

Pages
509–526
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research on collocations’ assessment has also been suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although corpora and corpus linguistics have been applied for quite long in foreign and second language settings, there is still limited understanding about how EFL learners use corpus tools along with dictionaries to enhance their collocation knowledge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with two non-English major advanced groups of L2 learners at a public university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research on collocations’ assessment has also been suggested.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Strong and weak collocations · Concordancers · Traditional learning

Abstract

Although corpora and corpus linguistics have been applied for quite long in foreign and second language settings, there is still limited understanding about how EFL learners use corpus tools along with dictionaries to enhance their collocation knowledge. This study aims to gain insight into the effectiveness of corpus-based pedagogy in comparison with the conventional vocabulary teaching methods, particularly using dictionaries. The study was conducted with two non-English major advanced groups of L2 learners at a public university. The experimental group studied 16 pre-selected formal academic words and their strong and weak collocations with corpus (COCA, the corpus of contemporary American English), while the comparison group studied the same collocations using advanced learner’s dictionaries. The instruments for collecting data included the Oxford placement test, pretest, posttest, and exercises devised for particular teaching points of collocations. Results of Repeated Measures ANOVA tests showed no significant difference between the two experimental groups. However, the corpus-based approach showed more impact on the reception of strong collocations acquired by the corpus group at a slightly better performance rate, as evidenced by the group’s mean scores (Corpus =45.91, Dictionary= 44.06). Interestingly, the acquisition of weak collocations was better for the dictionary use group (Corpus=54.08, Dictionary= 57.18). The paper thus offers some implications for teaching and assessing collocation knowledge and makes suggestions that EFL practitioners should create variations in instructional methodologies through gaining awareness of the increasing availability of innovative technologies. Further research on collocations’ assessment has also been suggested.

Özet

Although corpora and corpus linguistics have been applied for quite long in foreign and second language settings, there is still limited understanding about how EFL learners use corpus tools along with dictionaries to enhance their collocation knowledge. This study aims to gain insight into the effectiveness of corpus-based pedagogy in comparison with the conventional vocabulary teaching methods, particularly using dictionaries. The study was conducted with two non-English major advanced groups of L2 learners at a public university. The experimental group studied 16 pre-selected formal academic words and their strong and weak collocations with corpus (COCA, the corpus of contemporary American English), while the comparison group studied the same collocations using advanced learner’s dictionaries. The instruments for collecting data included the Oxford placement test, pretest, posttest, and exercises devised for particular teaching points of collocations. Results of Repeated Measures ANOVA tests showed no significant difference between the two experimental groups. However, the corpus-based approach showed more impact on the reception of strong collocations acquired by the corpus group at a slightly better performance rate, as evidenced by the group’s mean scores (Corpus =45.91, Dictionary= 44.06). Interestingly, the acquisition of weak collocations was better for the dictionary use group (Corpus=54.08, Dictionary= 57.18). The paper thus offers some implications for teaching and assessing collocation knowledge and makes suggestions that EFL practitioners should create variations in instructional methodologies through gaining awareness of the increasing availability of innovative technologies. Further research on collocations’ assessment has also been suggested.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUN, H. (2022). The Learning Effect of Corpora on Strong and Weak Collocations: Implications for Corpus-Based Assessment of Collocation Competence. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 509–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/540058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of make in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 173-194.
  2. Anderson, W., & Corbert, J. (2017). Exploring English with Online Corpora. Palgrave. Barlow, M., & Burdine, S. (2006).
  3. Phrasal verbs. Athelsan Pubns. Basal, A. (2019). Learning collocations: Effects of online tools on teaching English adjective‐noun collocations [Article]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 342-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12562
  4. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bernardini, S. (2002). Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 165–182).
  5. Rodopi. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical Bundles in Conversations and Academic Prose. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: studies in honour of Stig Johansson. Rodopi. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at.: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371-405.
  6. Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223 250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000025
  7. Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
  9. Breyer, Y. (2009). Learning and teaching with corpora: reflections by student teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 153-172.
  10. Callies, M. (2016). Towards a process-oriented approach to comparing EFL and ESL varieties [Article]. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research (IJLCR), 2(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.05cal
  11. Callies, M., & Götz, S. (2015). Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment (Vol. 70). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Çelik, S. (2011). Developing Collocational Competence Through Web Based Concordance Activities. Novıtas Royal research on Youth and Language, 5(2), 273-286.
  12. Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies Language Learni