Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of a Middle School Preservice Teacher’s Knowledge of Content and Students

Pages
818–841
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With regard to the teacher’s abilities to recognise and understand students’ typical understandings and misunderstandings, the study demonstrated that the preservice teacher was capable of explaining some solution strategies but not all of them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to explicate one preservice middle grades mathematics teacher’s Knowledge of Content and Students (KCS) in the context of multiple solution strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, the research inquiry guiding this study focused on how a middle school preservice mathematics teacher displays KCS when engaging with tasks about pattern recognition and linear functions in the context of multiple solution strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With regard to the teacher’s abilities to recognise and understand students’ typical understandings and misunderstandings, the study demonstrated that the preservice teacher was capable of explaining some solution strategies but not all of them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching · Knowledge of Content and Students · Preservice teacher education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explicate one preservice middle grades mathematics teacher’s Knowledge of Content and Students (KCS) in the context of multiple solution strategies. This study’s purpose is to underline the importance of preservice teachers’ KCS and provide possible investigative methods for evaluating preservice teachers’ KCS. Specifically, the research inquiry guiding this study focused on how a middle school preservice mathematics teacher displays KCS when engaging with tasks about pattern recognition and linear functions in the context of multiple solution strategies. The data consisted of three videotaped semi-structured interviews with the preservice mathematics teacher as well as the written work she produced during the interviews. This study explicated one preservice mathematic teacher’s performance regarding two important themes of KCS: generating multiple possible solution strategies of middle school students and explaining multiple student solution strategies. In terms of generating multiple solution strategies of middle school students, the study found that the preservice mathematics teacher provided the same solution strategies that she employed when she solved the problems by herself. Regarding explaining multiple student solution strategies, this study revealed that the preservice teacher did not explicate how typical middle school students reason. The preservice teacher had limitations when explaining the possible procedures that students might have used to solve problems when given the final student solutions. With regard to the teacher’s abilities to recognise and understand students’ typical understandings and misunderstandings, the study demonstrated that the preservice teacher was capable of explaining some solution strategies but not all of them.

Özet

The purpose of this study was to explicate one preservice middle grades mathematics teacher’s Knowledge of Content and Students (KCS) in the context of multiple solution strategies. This study’s purpose is to underline the importance of preservice teachers’ KCS and provide possible investigative methods for evaluating preservice teachers’ KCS. Specifically, the research inquiry guiding this study focused on how a middle school preservice mathematics teacher displays KCS when engaging with tasks about pattern recognition and linear functions in the context of multiple solution strategies. The data consisted of three videotaped semi-structured interviews with the preservice mathematics teacher as well as the written work she produced during the interviews. This study explicated one preservice mathematic teacher’s performance regarding two important themes of KCS: generating multiple possible solution strategies of middle school students and explaining multiple student solution strategies. In terms of generating multiple solution strategies of middle school students, the study found that the preservice mathematics teacher provided the same solution strategies that she employed when she solved the problems by herself. Regarding explaining multiple student solution strategies, this study revealed that the preservice teacher did not explicate how typical middle school students reason. The preservice teacher had limitations when explaining the possible procedures that students might have used to solve problems when given the final student solutions. With regard to the teacher’s abilities to recognise and understand students’ typical understandings and misunderstandings, the study demonstrated that the preservice teacher was capable of explaining some solution strategies but not all of them.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSARI, E. (2022). Investigation of a Middle School Preservice Teacher’s Knowledge of Content and Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 818–841. https://ajindex.com/articles/540049

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alqahtani, M. M., & Powell, A. B. (2017). Mediational activities in a dynamic geometry environment and teachers’ specialized content knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 77-94.
  2. An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the US. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145-172.
  3. Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 249-272.
  4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
  5. Baki, A. (2020). Matematiği öğretme bilgisi (3rd ed.). PegemAkademi Bansilal, S., Mkhwanazi, T., & Brijlall, D. (2014). An exploration of the common content knowledge of high school mathematics teachers. Perspectives in Education, 32(1), 34-50.
  6. Boerst, T. A., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2844-2877.
  7. Bryan, C. A., Wang, T., Perry, B., Wong, N., & Cai, J. (2007). Comparison and contrast: Similarities and differences of teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning from four regions. ZDM, 39(4), 329-340.
  8. Charalambous, C. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 247-278.
  9. Diez, M. E. (2010). It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education’s impact on student learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 441-450.
  10. Dyer, E. B., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). Instructional reasoning about interpretations of student thinking that supports responsive teaching in secondary mathematics. ZDM, 48(1-2), 69-82.
  11. Edelman, J. (2017). How preservice teachers use children’s literature to teach mathematical concepts: focus on mathematical knowledge for teaching. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 741-752.
  12. Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: changing teachers’ views by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33-56.
  13. Gvozdic, K., & Sander, E. (2018). When intuitive conceptions overshadow pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers’ conceptions of students’ arithmetic word problem solving strategies. Educational Studies in Mathem