Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Enhancing teaching and learning in higher education through formative assessment: Teachers’ Perceptions

Pages
61–79
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a whole, this study will provide a fundamental ground for future research in formative assessment in Bangladeshi colleges specifically and for comparative study with other higher education institutions globally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A good assessment system is one of the preconditions for quality education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A mixed-method study was employed with survey and semi-structured interview as the data collection methods. 100 participants were randomly (simple random) selected for the survey, and 6 participants were purposively selected for the interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a whole, this study will provide a fundamental ground for future research in formative assessment in Bangladeshi colleges specifically and for comparative study with other higher education institutions globally.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Formative assessment · Teachers’ perceptions · Higher education

Abstract

A good assessment system is one of the preconditions for quality education. Formative assessment is comparatively an emerging idea to assess the students throughout the academic year with the intention to identify and overcome the weaknesses of the students and enhance their learning outcome. Taking these into account, this study attempted to explore the teachers’ perceptions of the use of formative assessment in enhancing teaching and learning in Bangladesh higher education. A mixed-method study was employed with survey and semi-structured interview as the data collection methods. 100 participants were randomly (simple random) selected for the survey, and 6 participants were purposively selected for the interviews. For analysing the data, descriptive analysis and content analysis were used. The findings of the study revealed majority of the participants agreed that formative assessment is crucial to enhance teaching and learning in Bangladeshi colleges. Nonetheless, there are some challenges like - teachers’ biasness, shortage of teachers, large class, poor infrastructure, insufficient power supply, and heavy workload of the teachers. As a whole, this study will provide a fundamental ground for future research in formative assessment in Bangladeshi colleges specifically and for comparative study with other higher education institutions globally.

Özet

A good assessment system is one of the preconditions for quality education. Formative assessment is comparatively an emerging idea to assess the students throughout the academic year with the intention to identify and overcome the weaknesses of the students and enhance their learning outcome. Taking these into account, this study attempted to explore the teachers’ perceptions of the use of formative assessment in enhancing teaching and learning in Bangladesh higher education. A mixed-method study was employed with survey and semi-structured interview as the data collection methods. 100 participants were randomly (simple random) selected for the survey, and 6 participants were purposively selected for the interviews. For analysing the data, descriptive analysis and content analysis were used. The findings of the study revealed majority of the participants agreed that formative assessment is crucial to enhance teaching and learning in Bangladeshi colleges. Nonetheless, there are some challenges like - teachers’ biasness, shortage of teachers, large class, poor infrastructure, insufficient power supply, and heavy workload of the teachers. As a whole, this study will provide a fundamental ground for future research in formative assessment in Bangladeshi colleges specifically and for comparative study with other higher education institutions globally.

🔖

Cite This Article

HANEFAR, S. B. M., ANNY, N. Z., RAHMAN, S. (2022). Enhancing teaching and learning in higher education through formative assessment: Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 61–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/540043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alam, G. M., Mishra, P. K., & Shahjamal, M. M. (2014). Quality assurance strategies for affiliated institutions of HE: A case study of the affiliates under National University of Bangladesh. Higher Education, (68), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9712-y
  2. Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2013). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-918
  3. Azim, F. (2014). Learning promoted by classroom assessment in higher education of Bangladesh: A case study. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 26(1), 165–171. https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=6361051100970950650100221121170671080050450060580360031001150270701270660240960960890610300400440081091180261090081070290750790200590350130801250761250300660020910960390500080251161190741230771030730980160061141
  4. Begum, M., & Farooqui, S. (2008). School-based assessment: Will it really change the education scenario in Bangladesh? International Education Studies, 1(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v1n2p45
  5. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352900816000029
  6. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
  7. Bhuiyan, A. K. M. Z. H., & Hossain, D. M. L. (2017). Quality education at college level institutions: Bangladesh perspective. NAEM Journal, 12(24), 103–112.
  8. Bjornsrud, H., & Engh, R. (2012). Teamwork to enhance adapted teaching and formative assessment. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.402
  9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
  11. Boston, C. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation College Park MD., 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/ED47026, 2002-10-100
  12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school