Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Teachers’ perceived skills, challenges and attitudes towards distance education: A validity and reliability study

Pages
451–469
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study show that the scale can measure teachers’ perceived skills, challenges they face, and their attitudes towards distance education reliably and validly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool to examine teachers' attitudes towards distance education and perceived distance education skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of the study were collected from 2290 K-12 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study show that the scale can measure teachers’ perceived skills, challenges they face, and their attitudes towards distance education reliably and validly.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance education · Attitudes towards distance education · Challenges in distance education

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool to examine teachers' attitudes towards distance education and perceived distance education skills. The data of the study were collected from 2290 K-12 teachers. In the data analysis, reliability was calculated with stratified Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and for construct validity, EFA and CFA were performed. Bartlett and KMO tests were used for the suitability of the data for factor analysis. It was observed that the calculated correlations among the item and the total score for the 25-item trial form were above 0.20. As a result of the EFA, 7 items that loaded more than one factor, or with a factor loading less than 0.45 were excluded from the scale. Promax rotation revealed three factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00. The total explained variance of the final form of the scale (18 items) was found as 53.594%. The fit indices calculated in the confirmatory factor analysis (RMSEA = 0.053; CFI = 0.932; TLI = 0.918, SRMR = 0.055) confirmed the three-factor model. The results obtained showed that the model fits the data. The stratified alpha reliability for the whole scale was calculated as .848. The results of the study show that the scale can measure teachers’ perceived skills, challenges they face, and their attitudes towards distance education reliably and validly.

Özet

This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool to examine teachers' attitudes towards distance education and perceived distance education skills. The data of the study were collected from 2290 K-12 teachers. In the data analysis, reliability was calculated with stratified Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and for construct validity, EFA and CFA were performed. Bartlett and KMO tests were used for the suitability of the data for factor analysis. It was observed that the calculated correlations among the item and the total score for the 25-item trial form were above 0.20. As a result of the EFA, 7 items that loaded more than one factor, or with a factor loading less than 0.45 were excluded from the scale. Promax rotation revealed three factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00. The total explained variance of the final form of the scale (18 items) was found as 53.594%. The fit indices calculated in the confirmatory factor analysis (RMSEA = 0.053; CFI = 0.932; TLI = 0.918, SRMR = 0.055) confirmed the three-factor model. The results obtained showed that the model fits the data. The stratified alpha reliability for the whole scale was calculated as .848. The results of the study show that the scale can measure teachers’ perceived skills, challenges they face, and their attitudes towards distance education reliably and validly.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAN, D. Ç., ÖZTEMÜR, B. (2022). Teachers’ perceived skills, challenges and attitudes towards distance education: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 451–469. https://ajindex.com/articles/540032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adıyaman, Z. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim yoluyla yabancı dil öğretimi [Foreign language teaching through distance education]. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 4, 420-425. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sakaefd/issue/11231/134140
  2. Ağır, F. (2008). Uzaktan eğitime karşı tutum ölçeği geliştirmeye yönelik geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of the attitude scale towards distance learning: Reliability and validity], Education Sciences, 3(2), 128-13.
  3. Akaslan, D., & Law, E.L.C. (2011). Measuring teachers’ readiness for e-learning in higher education institutions associated with the subject of electricity in Turkey. 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon.2011.5773180
  4. Akinbadewa, B.O., & Sofowora, O.A. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia instructional learning packages in enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward Biology. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 2(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.19
  5. Alharthi, M. (2020). Students’ attitudes toward the use of technology in online courses. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 3(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.v3i1.18
  6. Allen, B., Crosky, A., Yench, E., Lutze-Mann, L., Blennerhassett, P., Lebard, R., Thordarson, P., & Wilk, K. (2010). A model for transformation: A trans-disciplinary approach to disseminating good practice in blended learning in science faculty, Curriculum, technology & transformation for unknown future. Proceedings of ascilite Sydney, 36-48.
  7. Alshangeeti, A., Alsaghier, H., & Nguyen, A. (2009). Faculty perceptions of attributes affecting the diffusion of online learning in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative study, 4th International Conference on e-Learning, Toronto, Canada. Anderson, J. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic is reshaping education, Quartz. https://qz.com/1826369/how-coronavirus-is-changing-education/
  8. Arat, T., & Bakan, Ö. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim ve uygulamaları [Distance education and its applications], Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14(1), 363-374.
  9. Arora, A.K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching–learning process: A Study of Higher Education Teachers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825 BAU (2020, August 16). BAU distance education report. https://bau.edu.tr/haber/15707-%20bau-uzaktan-egitim-raporu
  10. Bozkurt, A., Akg