Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 153 - Sayı: 153

UPPER CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY GEOLOGY/STRATIGRAPHY OF PERTEK AND ITS VICINITY (TUNCELİ, TURKEY)

Pages
1–44
Publication Date
2016-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the last tectonic phase, the Anatolian plate bounded by the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) in E-SE began to move westward, and the right lateral strike slip Pertek Fault activated in the study area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The basement units of the study area are Paleozoic-Mesozoic Keban metamorphics and Late Cretaceous Elazığ magmatics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Early Lutetian Seske formation consists of conglomerate at the bottom and much nummulitic, carbonate cemented sandstone with ophiolitic fragments at the top.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the last tectonic phase, the Anatolian plate bounded by the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) in E-SE began to move westward, and the right lateral strike slip Pertek Fault activated in the study area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elazığ Magmatics · Harami formation · Kırkgeçit formation

Abstract

The basement units of the study area are Paleozoic-Mesozoic Keban metamorphics and Late Cretaceous Elazığ magmatics. As a result of tectonic events caused by final collision in Middle Maastrichtian, all these basement units were juxtaposed, uplifted, eroded and acted as a source area for the Maastrichtian-Paleogene basins. Upper Cretaceous Paleogene deposits were systematically sampled in order to determine their ages and lithologies. Due to new age findings and stratigraphical positions the marine units were identified as; Harami, Seske and Kırkgeçit formations. Late Oligocene-Early Miocene Alibonca formation and Pliocene Karabakır formation are the other units of the study area. Maastrichtian-Thanetian Harami formation is formed by grainstone intercalated with sandstone at the bottom and white limestone at the top. Early Lutetian Seske formation consists of conglomerate at the bottom and much nummulitic, carbonate cemented sandstone with ophiolitic fragments at the top. Kırkgeçit formation consists of sandstone-siltstone-limestone intercalation, and it is early Bartonian early Chattian. Late Chattian-middle Burdigalian Alibonca formation consists of conglomerate at the bottom, reefal limestone in the middle and clayey limestone intercalated with algal limestone at the top. Pliocene Karabakır formation is formed by conglomerate-mudstone and locally by intercalations of pyroclastics and lavas. Pertek Andesite and Basalt Members are both vertically and laterally transitional with sedimentary lithologies of the Karabakır formation. There is no data to date the lithology; however, it was assumed that it had been Pliocene in age according to the lithostratigraphical succession. In the study area, macrotectonic events were experienced in Late Cretaceous, Early Eocene, middle-late Lutetian, Middle?-Late Miocene and in the Latest Pliocene. During the last tectonic phase, the Anatolian plate bounded by the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) in E-SE began to move westward, and the right lateral strike slip Pertek Fault activated in the study area.

🔖

Cite This Article

HERECE, E. İ., ACAR, Ş. (2016). UPPER CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY GEOLOGY/STRATIGRAPHY OF PERTEK AND ITS VICINITY (TUNCELİ, TURKEY). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 153 - Sayı: 153, 1–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/53996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akay, E., Erkan, E., Ünay, E. 1989. Muş Tersiyer havzasının stratigrafisi, Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration, 109, 59-76.
  2. Aksoy, E. 1994. Pertek (Tunceli) çevresinin jeolojik özellikleri, F.Ü. Fen ve Müh. Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 1-18.
  3. Aksoy, E., Türkmen, İ., Turan, M., Meriç, E. 1999. Harami Formasyonu’nun (Üst Kampaniyen-Maastrihtiyen) stratigrafik konumu ve çökel ortamıyla ilgili yeni bulgular, Elazığ güneyi, TPJD Bulletin, 11(1), 1-15.
  4. Aktaş, G., Robertson, A.H.F. 1984.
  5. The Maden Complex, SE Turkey: evolution of a Neotethyan continental margin. In: Dixon, J.E., Robertson, A.H.F. (eds). The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., 17, 375-402.
  6. Aktaş, G., Robertson, A.H.F. 1990. Tectonic evolution of the Tethys suture zone in SE Turkey: evidence from the petrology and geochemistry of Late Cretaceous and Middle Eocene extrusive, In Ophiolites oceanic crustal analogues, (Edited by Moores, E.M., Panayiotou, A and Xenophontos), Proceeding of the International Symposium ‟Troodos 1987”,
  7. Nicosia, Cyprus, Cyprus Geological Survey Department, 311-328.
  8. Asutay, H.J. 1988. Baskil (Elazığ) çevresinin jeolojisi ve Baskil magmatitlerinin petrolojisi, Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration, 107. Arger, J., Mitchell, J., Westaway, R. 2000. Neogene and Quaternary volcanism of South-Eastern Turkey, Bozkurt, E. Winchester, J.A. Piper, J.D.A. (Eds), Tectonics and Magmatism of Turkey and Surrounding Area, Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 173, 459-487.
  9. Avşar, N. 1991. Elazığ Bölgesinde Nummulites fabianii (Prever) Grubunun (Nummulites Ex gr. fabianii) varlığı ile ilgili foraminiferler, Bul.Min.Res.Exp, 112, 155-160.
  10. Avşar, N. 1996. Inner Platform sediments with Praebullaveolina afyonica Sirel and Acar around Elazığ Region (E. Turkey), Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration., 118, 9-14.
  11. Beyarslan, M., Bingöl, A.F. 1996. Kömürhan ofiyolit biriminin petrografik ve petrolojik incelenmesi, F.Ü. Fen ve Müh. Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 1-16.
  12. Beyarslan, M., Bingöl, A.F. 2000. Petrology of a supra-subduction zone ophiolite (Elazığ, Turkey), Canadian Journal Earth Science, 37, 1411-1423. Bingöl. A.F. 1984. Geology of the Elazığ Area in the Eastern Taurus Region: in the Geology of the Tau¬rus Belt; International Symposium Proceedings, O. Tekeli and M.C. Göncüoğlu (eds.), 209-216,
  13. MTA, Ankara.
  14. Bingöl, A.F. 1998. Petrographical and petrological features of the intrusive rocks of Yüksekova Complex in the Elazı