Journals / International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF MICROFLUIDIC LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES

Pages
692–708
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the 3D printing of microfluidics is a promising area for often novel applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, also known as 3D printing, which offer advantages such as design flexibility, short lead time and cost effectiveness compared to traditional production methods, are used in many different areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lab-on-chip systems, which are time-consuming, specialization-required, and expensive to produce with traditional 2D microfabrication technologies such as lithography and PDMS-glass bonding, have become easily producible with AM methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the 3D printing of microfluidics is a promising area for often novel applications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Additive Manufacturing · 3D Printing · Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, also known as 3D printing, which offer advantages such as design flexibility, short lead time and cost effectiveness compared to traditional production methods, are used in many different areas. With the exponentially increasing technological developments, complex structures at micron level can be produced and used in customized applications. One promising unique application of AM is Lab-on-a-chips (LOCs). These microfluidic devices can effectively be used in laboratory experiments carried out on a very small scale in biomedical, chemistry and clinical cases. Lab-on-chip systems, which are time-consuming, specialization-required, and expensive to produce with traditional 2D microfabrication technologies such as lithography and PDMS-glass bonding, have become easily producible with AM methods. Although there are many different AM methods can be used in 3D printing of microfluidics, Multi Jet Printing (MJP) method is frequently preferred because of its high sensitivity and dimensional accuracy. MJP AM technology is based on spraying photopolymer resins to a layer thickness of down to 16 µm, then curing with UV light. This paper critically reviews relevant methods and materials used for 3D printing of microfluidics, especially for the MJP based technologies. A case study on 3d printing complex microchannels for microfluidics application using a commercial material jetting based 3D printer (Objet 30 Prime - Stratasys) has also been presented. The results show that the 3D printing of microfluidics is a promising area for often novel applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sezer, H. K., Eren, O., Çuhadaroğlu, M. B. (2022). ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF MICROFLUIDIC LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 692–708. https://ajindex.com/articles/539754

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ürkmez, B., “Lab on a Chip”, http://www.acikbilim.com/tag/lab-on-a-chip, May 4, 2021
  2. Chow, A.W., “Lab‐on‐a‐chip: Opportunities for chemical engineering” AIChE Journal, Vol. 48 Issue 8, Pages 1590-1595, 2002
  3. Gupta, K., Kim, D.H., Ellison, D., Smith, C., Kundu, A., Tuan, J. and Levchenko, A., “Lab-on-a-chip devices as an emerging platform for stem cell biology”, Lab on a Chip, Vol. 10, Issue 16, Pages 2019-2031, 2010
  4. Li, G.P., Bachman, M. and Lee, A. U.S. Patent Application No. 10/763, 540, 2004
  5. Chin, C.D., Linder, V.and Sia, S. K., “Lab-on-a-chip devices for global health: Past studies and future opportunities”, Lab on a Chip, Vol. 7, Issue 1, Pages 41-57, 2007
  6. Ríos, Á., Zougagh, M. and Avila, M., “Miniaturization through lab-on-a-chip: Utopia or reality for routine laboratories A review”, Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 740, Pages 1-11, 2012
  7. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia, "Membrane", https://www.britannica.com/science/membrane-biology. Accessed, May 4, 2021
  8. Hansen, C.L., Skordalakes, E., Berger, J.M. and Quake, S.R., “A robust and scalable microfluidic metering method that allows protein crystal growth by free interface diffusion”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, Pages 16531–16536, 2002
  9. Takayama, S., Ostuni, E., LeDuc, P., Naruse, K., Ingber, D.E. Whitesides, G.M., “Subcellular positioning of small molecules”, Nature, Vol. 411, Issue 1016, 2001
  10. Ren, K., Zhou, J. and Wu, H., “Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Accounts of chemical research”, Vol. 46, Issue 11, Pages 2396-2406, 2013. 11. elveflow.com, “Materials for microfluidic device fabrication: a review”, May 4, 2021
  11. Kemp, G., “Capillary electrophoresis”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary_electrophoresis, May 4, 2021
  12. Wu, W.I., Sask, K.N., Brash, J.L. and Selvaganapathy, P.R., “Polyurethane-based microfluidic devices for blood contacting applications”, Lab on a Chip, Vol. 12, Issue 5, Pages 960-970, 2012
  13. Nge, P.N., Rogers, C.I. and Woolley, A. T., “Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications”, Chemical Reviews, Vol. 113, Issue 4, Pages 2550-2583, 2013
  14. Grist, S.M., Oyunerdene, N., Flueckiger, J., Kim, J., Wong, P.C., Chrostowski, L. and Cheung, K. C., “Fabrication and laser patterning of polystyrene optical oxygen sensor films for lab-on-a-chip applications”, Analyst, Vol. 139, Issue 22, Pages 5718-5727, 2014
  15. Ogończyk, D., Węgrzyn, J., Jankowski, P., Dąbrowski, B. and Garstecki, P., “Bon