SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 156 - Sayı: 156

The Naşa intrusion (Western Anatolia) and its tectonic implication: A joint analyses of gravity and earthquake catalog data

C. Ertan TOKER
Emin U. ULUGERGERLİ
Ali Rıza KILIÇ
Pages
247–258
Publication Date
2018-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All tectonic structures were marked on the three dimensional relief model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The gravity data gathered in and around the Simav Graben in Western Anatolia were reprocessed and reinterpreted by using the standard deviation fi lter and the Euler deconvolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The intrusion is located in the eastern margin of the graben and has a thickness of 12-15 km at 2.5-3 km depth below the surface.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All tectonic structures were marked on the three dimensional relief model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gravity · Earthquake · Simav

Abstract

The gravity data gathered in and around the Simav Graben in Western Anatolia were reprocessed and reinterpreted by using the standard deviation fi lter and the Euler deconvolution. The joint evaluation of results from the interpretation of gravity data and seismological studies indicates the presence of new intrusive structures in the vicinity of Simav. The intrusion is located in the eastern margin of the graben and has a thickness of 12-15 km at 2.5-3 km depth below the surface. Numerous earthquakes recorded in the eastern part of the graben are associated with this intrusion. Besides, the multidimensional modelling study of the gravity data allowed us to display the Simav Graben, the fold of the Simav Fault, the intrusion named as Naşa, and the epicenters of earthquake within the same tectonic frame. All tectonic structures were marked on the three dimensional relief model.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKER, C. E., ULUGERGERLİ, E. U., KILIÇ, A. R. (2018). The Naşa intrusion (Western Anatolia) and its tectonic implication: A joint analyses of gravity and earthquake catalog data. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 156 - Sayı: 156, 247–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/53964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ansari, A. H., Alamdar, K. 2011. A new edge detection method based on the analytic signal of tilt angle (ASTA) for magnetic and gravity anomalies, IJST A2: 81-88, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Arısoy, M.Ö., Dikmen, Ü. 2011. Potensoft: MATLAB based software for potential field data processing, modeling and mapping, Computer And Geoscience, 37, 7, pp. 935 – 942. Arpat, E., Bingöl, E.,1969. Ege bölgesi graben sisteminin gelişimi üzerine düşünceler, Journal of Mineral Research and Exploration, 73, pp.1-9,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Bekler, T., Demirci, A., Özden, S., Kalafat, D. 2011.
  4. Simav, Emet fay zonlarındaki optimum kaynak parametrelerinin analizi, 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, ODTÜ, ANKARA. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi Deprem Kataloğu. 2016. www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/scripts/sondepremler.asp Cooper, G.R.J., Cowan, D.R. 2004. Filtering using variable order vertical derivatives. Computer and Geoscience, 30, 455-459.
  5. Cooper, G.R.J., Cowan, D.R. 2003. Sunshading geophysical data using fractional order horizontal gradients. The Leading Edge. 22:204 Cooper, G.R.J., 2011. The Semi-Automatic Interpretation of Gravity Profile Data March 2011Computers & Geosciences 37(8) DOI10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.016 Cooper, G.R.J., Cowan, D.R. 2008 Edge enhancement of potential field data using normalized statistics GEOPHYSICS(2008),73(3):H1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2837309
  6. Demirbaş, Ş., Uslu A. 1984.
  7. Kütahya Simav Gravite Etüdü, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Report No: 8136, Ankara (unpublished). D’errico, J. 2016. Personel Web Page https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/./869215-john-
  8. Doğan, A., Emre, Ö. 2006. Ege graben sisteminin kuzey sınırı: Sındırgı Sincanlı Fay Zonu, 59. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı, Proceedings. Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Duman, fi., Özalp, S. 2012. Türkiye diri fay haritası (renwed), Maden Tetkik ve Arama Yayınları, Ankara. Geological map of Turkey 2002 General Directorate Mineral Research and exploration http://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/hizmetler/500cd
  9. Gündoğdu, E., Özden, S., Karaca, Ö., 2016. Comparative structural analysis of field data from Simav fault and surrounding area with alos-palsar and landsat images, Journal of the graduate school of natural and applied sciences of Erciyes University Vol:32 No:1 Hsu, S.K., Sibuet, J.C., Shyu, C.T. 1996. Depth to magnetic source using generalized analytic signal, Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
  10. Jassim, F.A. 2013. Semi – optimal edge detector based on simple standard deviation with a