One way Anova and Scheffe posthoc tests were performed for statistics.Results: In the G-aenial group, the highest bond strength was obtainedwith laser-bond method (N=17.71, P
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To assess the bonding strength of the Equia Forte resin-modifiedglass ionomer cement to the hybrid composite material by applyingdifferent surface treatments.Methodology: 140 samples as 70 Equia Forte and 70 G-eanial compositeswere produced as 8 mm diameter 3 mm high cylindrical standardizedsamples.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The samples were divided into 7 groups to treat surfaces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One way Anova and Scheffe posthoc tests were performed for statistics.Results: In the G-aenial group, the highest bond strength was obtainedwith laser-bond method (N=17.71, P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:140 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: To assess the bonding strength of the Equia Forte resin-modifiedglass ionomer cement to the hybrid composite material by applyingdifferent surface treatments.Methodology: 140 samples as 70 Equia Forte and 70 G-eanial compositeswere produced as 8 mm diameter 3 mm high cylindrical standardizedsamples. The samples were divided into 7 groups to treat surfaces. Geanial composite resins as 4 mm diameter 3 mm high was placed onto thesamples and polymerized. Then 1000 thermal cycle was applied andsamples were mounted in the universal testing machine. Obtained bondstrength values were recorded as Newton. One way Anova and Scheffe posthoc tests were performed for statistics.Results: In the G-aenial group, the highest bond strength was obtainedwith laser-bond method (N=17.71, P
🔖
Cite This Article
HATİPOĞLU, Ö., ARICIOĞLU, B. (2022). Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass hybrid restorative system repaired with hybrid composite resin. International Dental Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 131–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/539542
Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dental materials 2002;18:454-62. (Crossref
Sidhu S. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Australian dental journal 2011;56:23-30. (Crossref
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry 2004;29:481- 508
Bagheri R, Tyas M, Burrow M. Subsurface degradation of resinbased composites. Australian Dental Journal 2006;51:S6
Jaffer F, Finer Y, Santerre J. Interactions between resin monomers and commercial composite resins with human saliva derived esterases. Biomaterials 2002;23:1707-19. (Crossref
Mair L. Surface permeability and degradation of dental composites resulting from oral temperature changes. Dental Materials 1989;5:247-55. (Crossref
Krejci I, Lieber CM, Lutz F. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss. Dental Materials 1995;11:34-40. (Crossref
Staxrud F, Tveit A, Rukke H, Kopperud S. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway. Journal of dentistry 2016;52:50-4. (Crossref
Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2006; 8
Delfino CS, Souza‐Zaroni WC, Corona SAM, Palma‐Dibb RG. Microtensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel prepared using erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2007;80:475-9. (Crossref
Souza‐Zaroni WC, Chinelatti MA, Delfino CS, Pécora JD, Palma‐ Dibb RG, Corona SA. Adhesion of a self‐etching system to dental substrate prepared by Er: YAG laser or air abrasion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2008;86:321-9. (Crossref
Malmström H, Chaves Y, Moss M. Patient preference: conventional rot