SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The evaluation of visibility of mandibular anatomic landmarks using panoramic radiography

Ceren AKTUNA BELGİN
Gözde SERİNDERE
Pages
69–77
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theaim of this study was to evaluate the visibility of these importantlandmarks in different age groups and to compare the visibility in thedentulous group with the edentulous group on panoramic radiographs.Methodology: Panoramic radiographs of 500 patients (237 males and 263females; mean age:39.2) were evaluated for this study; the visibility oftheir anatomical landmarks was analyzed, and scores were noted.The dataobtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program.The value ofp

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The mandibular canal, mandibular foramen, mental foramen, andincisive canal are important anatomical structures for dental surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: The mandibular canal, mandibular foramen, mental foramen, andincisive canal are important anatomical structures for dental surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theaim of this study was to evaluate the visibility of these importantlandmarks in different age groups and to compare the visibility in thedentulous group with the edentulous group on panoramic radiographs.Methodology: Panoramic radiographs of 500 patients (237 males and 263females; mean age:39.2) were evaluated for this study; the visibility oftheir anatomical landmarks was analyzed, and scores were noted.The dataobtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program.The value ofp
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The mandibular canal, mandibular foramen, mental foramen, andincisive canal are important anatomical structures for dental surgery. Theaim of this study was to evaluate the visibility of these importantlandmarks in different age groups and to compare the visibility in thedentulous group with the edentulous group on panoramic radiographs.Methodology: Panoramic radiographs of 500 patients (237 males and 263females; mean age:39.2) were evaluated for this study; the visibility oftheir anatomical landmarks was analyzed, and scores were noted.The dataobtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program.The value ofp

🔖

Cite This Article

BELGİN, C. A., SERİNDERE, G. (2022). The evaluation of visibility of mandibular anatomic landmarks using panoramic radiography. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 69–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/539535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bhaskar SN. Radiographic interpretation for the Density. 2nd ed. St Louis: The CV. Mosby Co.; 1975. p.78-83
  2. Juodzbalys G, Wang H, Sabalys G. Anatomy of mandibular vital structures. Mandibular canal and inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in relation with dental implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010;1:1-8. (Crossref
  3. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(1):81-5. (Crossref
  4. Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Maal TJ, Mulder J, Rangel FA, Borstlap WA, et al. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(4):811-7. (Crossref
  5. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006;77(12):1933–43. (Crossref
  6. Kapoor S, Sandhu A, Singla A, Sandhu S. Topographic anatomy of mandibular foramen in different age groups using panoramic radiographs. Eur J. Anat 2018; 22 (1): 27-35
  7. Singh N, Jaju P, Jaju S, Agarwal R. Detection of anatomical variations in mandible by panoramic radiography. J Cranio- Maxillary Dis 2014;3:95-100. (Crossref
  8. Nagaraj T, Keerthi I, James L, Shruthi R, Balraj L, Bhavana TV. Visibility of mandibular anatomical landmarks in panoramic radiography: A retrospective study. Journal of Medicine, Radiology, Pathology & Surgery 2016; 2: 14–17. (Crossref
  9. White SC, Pharaoh MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 5th ed. Netherlands: Elsevier Publication; 2004
  10. Srisha Basappa, Smitha JD, Nishath Khanum*, Santosh Kanwar, Mahesh MS and Archana Patil. Visibility of Maxillary and Mandibular Anatomical Landmarks in Digital Panoramic Radiographs: A Retrospective Study. Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences 2017;5(3):36-41
  11. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, Van Steenberghe D, Sanderink G, Quirynen M. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:329–33. (Crossref
  12. Jalili MR, Emaeelinejad M, Bayat M, Aghdasi MM. Appearance of anatomical structures of mandible on panoramic radiographs in Iranian population. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:384-9. (Crossref
  13. Farida Abesi, Nima Nikafshar, Sina Haghanifar, Soraya Khafri,Mahtab Hamzeh. Can th