SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the effects of different chelating solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin

Celalettin TOPBAŞ
Özkan ADIGÜZEL
Özlem ÇÖLGEÇEN
Pages
22–29
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One Way Analysis of Variance ANOVA was used for statistical-analysis and statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of different chelating solutions on microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: The crowns of sixty recently extracted maxillary central incisors were separated by diamond burs from the cemento-enamel junction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One Way Analysis of Variance ANOVA was used for statistical-analysis and statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of different chelating solutions on microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin. Methodology: The crowns of sixty recently extracted maxillary central incisors were separated by diamond burs from the cemento-enamel junction. Roots are divided longitudinally into two pieces with diamond saw. The obtained samples were embedded in autopolymeric-acrylic and the dentin-surfaces of the teeth were grounded. Micro-hardness and surface-roughness measurements were carried out before the chelating processes. First group, the specimens were treated with gel-formed 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA] (JE), second group, specimens were treated with 17% Liquid-formed EDTA (LE), third group, specimens were treated with 20% Citric acid (CA), and the last group specimens were treated with 7% Maleic acid (MA) for 120 seconds. After application of the chelating agents, micro-hardness and surface-roughness measurements of all samples were performed again. The difference between the initial and final measurements was calculated and statistically analyzed. One Way Analysis of Variance ANOVA was used for statistical-analysis and statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPBAŞ, C., ADIGÜZEL, Ö., ÇÖLGEÇEN, Ö. (2022). Investigation of the effects of different chelating solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 22–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/539528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several consantrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endodon 1992;18:605-12. (Crossref
  2. Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Türkün M. The smear layer: A phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 1995;28:141-8. (Crossref
  3. Goldberg DB, Abromovich A. Analysis of the effect of EDTAC on the dentinal walls of the root canal. J Endod 1977;3:101-5. (Crossref
  4. Shahravan A. Haghdoost A, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2007;33:96-105. (Crossref
  5. Wayman BE, Kop WM, Pinero GJ, Lazzari EP. Citric and lactic acids as root canal irrigants in vitro. J Endod 1979;5:258-65. (Crossref
  6. Aktener BO, Bilkay U. Smear layer removal with different concentrations of EDTA-Ethylenediamine mixture. J Endod 1993;19:228-31. (Crossref
  7. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K, Kim J, Shabahang S. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003;29:170-5. (Crossref
  8. Calt S, Serper A. Smear layer removal by EGTA. J Endod 2000;26:459-61. (Crossref
  9. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-98. (Crossref
  10. Baumgartner JC, Brown CM, Mader CL, Peters DD, Schulman JD. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debridement using saline, sodium hypochlorite and citric acid. J Endod 1984;10:525-31. (Crossref
  11. Tidmarsh BG. Asid-cleansed and resin-sealed root canals. J Endod 1978;4:117-21. (Crossref
  12. Prabhu SG, Rahim N, Bhat KS, Mathew J. Comparison of removal of endodontic smear layer using NaOCl, EDTA, and different concentrations of maleic acid: A SEM study. Endodontology 2003;15:20–5
  13. Hennequin M, Pajot J, Avignant D. Effects of different pH values of citric acid solutions on the calcium and phosphorus contents of human root dentin. J Endod 1994;20:551-4. (Crossref
  14. Rotstein I, Dankner E, Goldman A, Heling I, Stabholz A, Zalkind M. Histochemical analysis of dental hard tissues following bleaching. J Endod 1996;22:23-6. (Crossref
  15. Ari H, Erdemir A, Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:792-5. (Crossref
  16. Baumgartner JC, Brown CM, Mader CL, Peters DD, Schulman JD. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debridement using saline, sodium hypochlorite and citric acid. J Endod 1984;10:525-31. (Crossref) 17.