Journals / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography

Pages
99–104
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was recorded that“slumped position” and “patient movement” errors were statisticallysignificant in >56 years (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence ofpanoramic radiographic errors and to evaluate the correlation betweenage and panoramic radiographic error types.Methodology: A total of 500 panoramic radiographs (259 male, 241female) which had been taken for various reasons were randomly selectedfrom the archive of our dentomaxillofacial radiology department.Patients were divided into six age groups and by sex.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The quality of each radiograph was rated as excellent,diagnostically acceptable or unacceptable.Results: One or more errors were detected in 317 (63.4%) of the 500panoramic radiographs, while no error was found in 183 (36.6%) of theimages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was recorded that“slumped position” and “patient movement” errors were statisticallysignificant in >56 years (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence ofpanoramic radiographic errors and to evaluate the correlation betweenage and panoramic radiographic error types.Methodology: A total of 500 panoramic radiographs (259 male, 241female) which had been taken for various reasons were randomly selectedfrom the archive of our dentomaxillofacial radiology department.Patients were divided into six age groups and by sex. The assessed errorsincluded the tongue not in contact with the palate, slumped position,patients not biting on bite block, patient movement, the chin tipped high,the chin tipped low, the patient positioned forward, the patientpositioned backward, patient’s head turned to one side, foreign bodies inthe image, exposure errors, positioning error of the lips and missingimage. The quality of each radiograph was rated as excellent,diagnostically acceptable or unacceptable.Results: One or more errors were detected in 317 (63.4%) of the 500panoramic radiographs, while no error was found in 183 (36.6%) of theimages. It was observed that the most common error type was theslumped position (13.2%). All of the panoramic radiographs wereevaluated according to the quality criteria: only 15% of the images wereclassified as “excellent”, 48.2% were rated “inadequate for diagnosis”and 36.8% were graded “adequate for diagnosis”. It was recorded that“slumped position” and “patient movement” errors were statisticallysignificant in >56 years (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİNDERE, G., BELGİN, C. A. (2022). Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 99–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/539527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Whaites E. The Quality of Radiographic Images and Quality Assurance: Principles of Radiographic Interpretation. 3rd ed. Longman Group UK Limited: Elsevier; 2002. p. 179-93
  2. Hart D, Wall BF, Hiller MC, Shrimpton PC. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Health Protection Agency, 2010
  3. Hirschmann PN. Guidelines on radiology standards for primary dental care: a resumé. Royal College of Radiologists and the National Radiological Protection Board. Br Dent J 1995; 178(5):165-7. (Crossref
  4. Ezoddini Ardakani F, Zangouie Booshehri M, Behniafar B. Evaluation of the distortion rate of panoramic and periapical radiographs in erupted third molar inclination. Iran J Radiol. 2011;8(1):15-21
  5. White SC, Pharaoh MJ. Oral Radiology: principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis - Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2014. p.166-77
  6. Al-Faleh W. Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography. Egyptian Dent J 2005;51:1813-17
  7. Subbulakshmi AC, Mohan N, Thiruneervannan R, Naveen S, Gokulraj S. Positioning errors in digital panoramic radiographs: A study. J Orofac Sci 2016;8:22-6. (Crossref
  8. Dhillon M, Raju SM, Verma S, et al. Positioning errors and quality assessment in panoramic radiography. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;42(4):207-12. (Crossref
  9. Choi BR, Choi DH, Huh KH, et al. Clinical image quality evaluation for panoramic radiography in Korean dental clinics. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;42(3):183-90. (Crossref
  10. Colak M, Adiguzel O, Aktuna Belgin C, Falakaloglu S, Akkus Z. Reliability of linear distance measurements of surgical implants and gutta percha lengths used in endodontic treatment with standardized digital radiography. Int Dent Res 2017;7:1-5. (Crossref
  11. Närhi TO, Leinonen K, Wolf J, Ainamo A. Longitudinal radiological study of the oral health parameters in an elderly Finnish population. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58(3):119-24. (Crossref
  12. Rushton VE, Horner K. The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. J Dent 1996;24(3):185-201. (Crossref
  13. Brezden NA, Brooks SL. Evaluation of panoramic dental radiographs taken in private practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:617-21. (Crossref
  14. Akarslan ZZ, Erten H, Güngör K, Celik I. Common Errors on Panoramic Radiographs Taken in a Dental School. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003;(4)2:24-34. (Crossref)