✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Data fromthe three groups were compared using analysis of variance and theTamhane T2 test. p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this in-vitro experimental study is to compare thebiomechanical behaviors of three single-miniplate osteosynthesisconfigurations used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.Methodology: Fifteen synthetic polyurethane hemimandible replicasincluding the medullar and cortical portions were used in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thereplicas were divided randomly into three groups (n = 5/group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data fromthe three groups were compared using analysis of variance and theTamhane T2 test. p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this in-vitro experimental study is to compare thebiomechanical behaviors of three single-miniplate osteosynthesisconfigurations used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.Methodology: Fifteen synthetic polyurethane hemimandible replicasincluding the medullar and cortical portions were used in this study. Thereplicas were divided randomly into three groups (n = 5/group). Data fromthe three groups were compared using analysis of variance and theTamhane T2 test. p
🔖
Cite This Article
ASL, H. G., POLAT, M. E., YANIK, S. (2022). Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 6–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/539514