Journals / International Dental Research / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Antibacterial and antifungal activity of MTA-basedroot canal sealer versus epoxy resin-based andmethacrylate resin-based sealers

Pages
66–72
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the set forms of AH 26 and AH Plus began to lose their antimicrobial activity on the tested microorganisms after a while.Conclusion: The results showed that the MTA-based root canal sealer MTA Fillapex may be a favorable alternative sealer against bacterial and/or fungal species in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial and antifungal activity of MTA Fillapex with AH 26, AH Plus, and RealSeal root canal sealers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: For the ADT, 48 Mueller-Hinton plates were divided into 3 groups according to the microorganism used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the set forms of AH 26 and AH Plus began to lose their antimicrobial activity on the tested microorganisms after a while.Conclusion: The results showed that the MTA-based root canal sealer MTA Fillapex may be a favorable alternative sealer against bacterial and/or fungal species in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial and antifungal activity of MTA Fillapex with AH 26, AH Plus, and RealSeal root canal sealers. S. aureus, E. faecalis, and C. albicans were used as test microorganisms with the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and the direct contact test (DCT). Methodology: For the ADT, 48 Mueller-Hinton plates were divided into 3 groups according to the microorganism used. Each group was then divided into 4 subgroups according to root canal sealer. Mueller-Hinton and Sabouraud agar mediums were preferred, and inhibition zones were measured to determine the antimicrobial efficacy at designated intervals. In the DCT, 96-well microtiter plates were used. For each microorganism and each sealer, 8 consecutive wells were prepared vertically on the plate. Microbial suspensions were allowed to directly contact the sealers in each well for 1 hour at 37°C. Subsequently, microbial growth was spectrophotometrically measured at set intervals for the freshly mixed and set forms.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the tested root canal sealers for antimicrobial effectiveness (p < 0.05). According to the ADT results, all sealers had antimicrobial activity against the tested microorganisms. MTA Fillapex demonstrated satisfying results in the ADT against all microorganisms. In the DCT, MTA Fillapex inhibited bacterial and fungal growth in all freshly mixed and set forms. However, the set forms of AH 26 and AH Plus began to lose their antimicrobial activity on the tested microorganisms after a while.Conclusion: The results showed that the MTA-based root canal sealer MTA Fillapex may be a favorable alternative sealer against bacterial and/or fungal species in clinical practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEMİR, A., TÜRKYILMAZ, A. (2022). Antibacterial and antifungal activity of MTA-basedroot canal sealer versus epoxy resin-based andmethacrylate resin-based sealers. International Dental Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 66–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/539513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 6-31. (Crossref
  2. Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Shalavi S. Antibacterial activity of a new mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealer. Int Dent J 2012; 62: 70-3. (Crossref
  3. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Rosalen PL, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles against selected microorganisms. Braz Dent J 2002; 13: 155-61. (Crossref
  4. Smith AJ, Robertson D, Tang MK, Jackson MS, MacKenzie D, Bagg J. Staphylococcus aureus in the oral cavity: a three-year retrospective analysis of clinical laboratory data. Br Dental J 2003; 195: 701-3. (Crossref
  5. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 2006; 32: 93-8. (Crossref
  6. Portenier I, Waltimo TMT, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis: the root canal survivor and “star” in post-treatment disease. Endod Topics 2003; 6: 135-59. (Crossref
  7. Siqueira JF, Sen BH. Fungi in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 632-41. (Crossref
  8. Baumgartner JC, Watts CM, Xia T. Occurrence of Candida albicans in infections of endodontic origin. J Endod 2000; 26: 695-8. (Crossref
  9. Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Torkko HL, Olsen I, Haapasalo MP. Fungi in therapy-resistant apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 96-101. (Crossref
  10. Kaplan AE, Picca M, Gonzalez MI, Macchi RL, Molgatini SL. Antimicrobial effect of six endodontic sealers: an in vitro evaluation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 42-5.(Crossref
  11. Bin CV, Valera MC, Camargo SE, Rabelo SB, Silva GO, Balducci I, et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of root canal sealers based on mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2012; 38: 495- 500. (Crossref
  12. Lodiene G, Morisbak E, Bruzell E, Orstavik D. Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 72-7
  13. Assmann E, Scarparo RK, Böttcher DE, Grecca FS. Dentin bond strength of two mineral trioxide aggregate-based and one epoxy resin-based sealers. J Endod 2012; 38: 219-21. (Crossref
  14. Sungur DD, Altundasar E, Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z. Influence of different final irrigation regiment and various endodontic filling materials on vertical root canal fracture resistance. Niger J Clin P