Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

An evaluation of the relationship between periocular anthropometric measurements and mandibular incisor crowding

Pages
216–221
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, we concluded that IICD— which remains stable after the age of 10 years—and ICW can be used to predict irregularities of the mandibular incisors among children in the Turkish population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between the periocular anthropometric measurements (POAM), intercanine width, and Little’s irregularity index (which measures the crowding of the mandibular incisors) among the Turkish population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Ninety-four children (49 with mandibular crowding and 45 in a control group) aged 12–18 years were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, we concluded that IICD— which remains stable after the age of 10 years—and ICW can be used to predict irregularities of the mandibular incisors among children in the Turkish population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between the periocular anthropometric measurements (POAM), intercanine width, and Little’s irregularity index (which measures the crowding of the mandibular incisors) among the Turkish population. Methodology: Ninety-four children (49 with mandibular crowding and 45 in a control group) aged 12–18 years were included in this study. Subjects’ inter-outer canthal distance (IOCD), inter-inner canthal distance (IICD), interpupillary distance (IPD), inter-canine width (ICW), and Littles’ irregularity index (LII) were measured from two standardized digital photographs using a public domain Java processing program (ImageJ software). Spearman’s correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression tests were used to investigate the relationship between POAM, ICW, and LII. Results: For the mandibular crowding group, the means of IICD, OICD, IPD, and ICW were 30.6 ± 1.7 mm, 82.4 ± 2.0 mm, 59.2 ± 1.6 mm, and 23.3 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the control group, the means of the corresponding measurements were 32.1 ± 1.5 mm, 84.4 ± 2.4 mm, 60.1 ± 1.9 mm, and 24.6 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups among all variables (p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between POAM and ICW with LDI. In particular, a high correlation was found between the ICW and IICD variables (r = -0.732, p < 0.001 versus r = -705, p < 0.001, respectively). As a result of this study’s multivariate regression analysis, IICD and ICW were found to be affected by mandibular crowding negatively and significantly (p = 0.003 and p = 0.026, respectively). Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, we concluded that IICD— which remains stable after the age of 10 years—and ICW can be used to predict irregularities of the mandibular incisors among children in the Turkish population.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİAÇIK, B. K. (2022). An evaluation of the relationship between periocular anthropometric measurements and mandibular incisor crowding. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 216–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/539509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gianelly AA. Treatment of crowding in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:569-71. (Crossref
  2. Sanin C, Savara BS. Factors that affect the alignment of the mandibular incisors: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod 1973;64:248-57. (Crossref) 3. van der Linden FP. Theoretical and practical aspects of crowding in the human dentition. Oral Health 1975;65:14-25, 31
  3. Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H. Factors contributing to mandibular anterior crowding in the early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 2004;74:754-8
  4. Türkkahraman H, Sayin M. Relationship Between Mandibular Anterior Crowding and Lateral Dentofacial Morphology in the Early Mixed Dentition. The Angle Orthodontist 2004;74:759-64
  5. Puri N, Pradhan KL, Chandna A, Sehgal V, Gupta R. Biometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded, and spaced permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:279 e7- 14. (Crossref
  6. Normando D, Almeida MA, Quintão CC. Dental crowding: the role of genetics and tooth wear. Angle Orthod 2013;83:10-5. (Crossref
  7. Al-Joubori S, Alhuwaizi A. Mandibular Teeth and Intercanine Widths in Association with Late Mandibular Anterior Crowding. Iraqi Orthodontic Journal 2006;2:27-30
  8. Al-Zubair NM. The relationship between mandibular arch length and widths in a sample of Yemeni subjects with normal dentoSkeletal relationship. J Orthod Sci 2013;2:120-3. (Crossref
  9. Tripathi S, Singh RD, Chand P, Kumar L, Singh GK. A study to correlate various facial landmarks with intercanine distance. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:440-4. (Crossref
  10. Moresca R. Orthodontic treatment time: can it be shortened? Dental Press J Orthod 2018;23:90-105. (Crossref
  11. Evereklioglu C, Doganay S, Er H, et al. Craniofacial anthropometry in a Turkish population. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:208-18. (Crossref
  12. Normando D, Silva P, Mendes Á. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size. European journal of orthodontics 2011;33:721-6. (Crossref
  13. Rajyalakshmi R, Prakash W, Ali M, Naik M. Periorbital Biometric Measurements using ImageJ Software: Standardisation of Technique and Assessment Of Intra- and Interobserver Variability. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 2017;10:130. (Crossref
  14. Yang YH, Wang B, Ding Y, Shi YW, Wang XG. Facial Anthropometric Proportion of Chinese Han Nationality. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:1601-4. (Crossref
  15. Raveendran M. The South Asian facial anthropometric profile: A systematic