Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Readability and content assessment of patient information texts on oral cancers found on Turkish websites

Pages
91–95
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although they are sufficient in terms of content, if they are not understood by the patients, their intended effects on readers will not be seen.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Oral cancer is one of the health problems that results in high mortality in the community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is known that, when diagnosed in the later stages (3 or 4), the disease is difficult to treat.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although they are sufficient in terms of content, if they are not understood by the patients, their intended effects on readers will not be seen.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Oral cancer is one of the health problems that results in high mortality in the community. It is known that, when diagnosed in the later stages (3 or 4), the disease is difficult to treat. Patient education on heredity and early diagnoses are critical for the successful treatment of oral cancer. This study aimed to evaluate Turkish texts about oral cancers found online in terms of their readability and content. Methodology: The first 100 websites returned from a Google search using the keywords "Ağız kanseri" (“oral cancer,” in Turkish) were examined. The patient information texts obtained were evaluated according to the Ateşman Readability Index. Their contents were also evaluated in terms of whether or not they provided sufficient information about the disease. Results: It was understood that the texts examined in the study were of medium difficulty according to the Ateşman Readability Index (mean 61.73± 11.81). The content of the information on the websites examined in the study was deemed sufficient and useful. Most of the websites examined were those of private clinics and hospitals. Conclusion: The results of the study indicated that the patient information texts found on Turkish websites were of medium reading difficulty. Although they are sufficient in terms of content, if they are not understood by the patients, their intended effects on readers will not be seen.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, D. I. (2022). Readability and content assessment of patient information texts on oral cancers found on Turkish websites. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 91–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/539502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Boyers LN, Quest T, Karimkhani C, Connett J, Dellavalle RP. Dermatology on YouTube. Dermatology online journal. 2014;20(6). (Crossref
  2. Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle RP. Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatologic clinics. 2009;27(2):133-6, vi. (Crossref
  3. TÜİK. Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanımı arastırması. 2020 [Available from:
  4. Bruch J, Treister N. Clinical Oral Medicine and Pathology2010. 1-169 p. (Crossref
  5. Mashberg A, Samit A. Early diagnosis of asymptomatic oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 1995;45(6):328-51. (Crossref
  6. Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Applied nursing research: ANR. 1996;9(3):139-43. (Crossref
  7. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal. 1997;58:171-4
  8. Huang GJ, Penson DF. Internet health resources and the cancer patient. Cancer investigation. 2008;26(2):202-7. (Crossref
  9. Kim K, Kwon N. Profile of e-patients: analysis of their cancer information-seeking from a national survey. Journal of health communication. 2010;15(7):712-33. (Crossref
  10. Du Bay WH. The Principles of Readibility. Costa Mesa. CA: Impact Information; 2004
  11. Bezirci B; Yilmaz AE. A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for Turkish. DEU FMD. 2010:;12(3): 49-62
  12. Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2010;468(10):2572-80. (Crossref
  13. Doak CC DL, Root JH. Assessing suitability of materials. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed ed. Philadelphia: J.B.: Lippincott Company; 1996. 41-60 p
  14. Wilson M. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations. Clinical nurse specialist CNS. 2009;23(1):33-40; quiz 1-2. (Crossref
  15. Chen X, Siu LL. Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada.