Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Evaluation of the surface properties of modified Ni-Ti arch wires

Pages
167–175
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The protocols that we used should help provide betterquality surfaces.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Materials used in orthodontic treatment can cause corrosion and metal ion release to the mouth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Our sample consisted of 16 Ni-Ti arch wires (0.016 × 0.022 inches).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The protocols that we used should help provide betterquality surfaces.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Materials used in orthodontic treatment can cause corrosion and metal ion release to the mouth. This study was aimed to examine the changes in the friction coefficients and corrosion resistance of the modified Ni-Ti arch wires. Methodology: Our sample consisted of 16 Ni-Ti arch wires (0.016 × 0.022 inches). Coating bathes involving Ni-Ti, Ni-Ti-Mo, and Ni-Ti-Cr were prepared for arch wires coating. New surfaces were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and the crystallographic structure was determined by X-rays. The friction coefficient of the coated wires was determined by nanoindentation. Artificial saliva was prepared as a corrosive condition. Impedance measurements were performed with an electrochemical analyzer. The AC impedance spectroscopy measurements were performed after 4 hours, 7, 15, 30, 45, and 60 days. Results: All groups were more resistant than the control group (-447 mV) [group 1 (-388 mV), group 2 (-328 mV), group 3 (-327 mV), group 4 (-427 mV), group 5 (-395 mV), group 6 (-366 mV), and group 7 (-380 mV)]. Friction coefficients of group 5 (0.252) and group 6 (0.265) were observed to be lower than those of the control group (0.288). Conclusion: In the results of our study, it was shown that the surface properties of Ni-Ti wires could be electrochemically improved. The coated wires (group 5 and group 6) had a remarkable corrosion resistance and reduced friction. The protocols that we used should help provide betterquality surfaces.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, H., ÖZYİLMAZ, A. T., ZORTUK, F. B. (2022). Evaluation of the surface properties of modified Ni-Ti arch wires. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 167–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/539493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA, Mizoguchi I. Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending and tension tests for orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011:140(1):65–71. (Crossref
  2. Tang EL, Wei SH. Assessing treatment effectiveness of removable and fixed orthodontic appliances with the occlusal index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990:98(6):550–6
  3. Redlich M, Mayer Y, Harari D, Lewinstein I. In vitro study of frictional forces during sliding mechanics of ‘reduced-friction’ brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003:124(1):69–73. (Crossref
  4. Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990:98(2):117–26. (Crossref
  5. Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999:115(1):39–51. (Crossref
  6. Fidalgo TK da S, Pithon MM, Maciel JVB, Bolognese AM. Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva: an in vitro evaluation. J Appl Oral Sci 2011:19(1):57–62. (Crossref
  7. Griffiths HS, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005:127(6):670–5. (Crossref
  8. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003:123(4):416–22. (Crossref
  9. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M, Defraia E, Barbato E. Forces Produced by Different Nonconventional Bracket or Ligature Systems during Alignment of Apically Displaced Teeth. Angle Orthod 2009:79(3):533–9. (Crossref
  10. Castro RM, Neto PS, Horta MCR, Pithon MM, Oliveira DD. Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets. J Appl Oral Sci 2013:21(4):314-9. (Crossref
  11. Tecco S, Di lorio D, Nucera R, Di Bisceglie B, Cordasco G, Festa F. Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems. Eur J Dent 2011:5(3):310–7. (Crossref
  12. Muguruma T, Iijima M, Brantley W A, Mizoguchi I. Effects of a diamond-like carbon coating on the frictional properties of orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod 2011:81(1):141–8. (Crossref
  13. Philips RW. Science of Dental Materials. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: 1991: 295
  14. Locci P, Lilli C, Marinucci L, Al E. In vitro cytotoxic effects of orthodontics appliances. J Biomed Mater Res 2000:53(5):560–7. (Crossref
  15. Schwabe K. The passivity