Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of panoramic, periapical, and cephalometric radiographic errors in dentistry

Pages
185–194
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An anatomical structure may lead to patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of working days and hours on panoramic and periapical radiographic errors and investigate the association between patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors and skeletal malocclusions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Obtained from archives of Manisa Dental Health Center, 1402 periapical, 1329 panoramic, and 309 cephalometric radiographs were investigated retrospectively between January-June 2018, and the radiographic errors were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An anatomical structure may lead to patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of working days and hours on panoramic and periapical radiographic errors and investigate the association between patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors and skeletal malocclusions. Methodology: Obtained from archives of Manisa Dental Health Center, 1402 periapical, 1329 panoramic, and 309 cephalometric radiographs were investigated retrospectively between January-June 2018, and the radiographic errors were determined. Periapical, panoramic, and total errors were grouped according to the number of radiographs, day intensity, and acquisition date and time for each day. Cephalometric radiographs were not included to determine the effects of working hours and days on radiographic errors since the radiographs were taken over the weekend. Patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors were investigated under the classification of skeletal malocclusions. The independent sample t-test was used to investigate the average range difference between two independent groups for normally distributed variables. However, in situations where the assumption of normality was not met, the MannWhitney U test was performed. Results: Total errors were mostly detected on Tuesday (p=0.035). Errors of panoramic and periapical radiographs acquired in the afternoon were higher than those of the radiographs acquired before noon only on Monday (p=0.024, p=0.035). The most common errors observed in periapical radiographs were the positioning errors (23.9%) and cone cut (17.3%), respectively. The most common errors observed in panoramic radiographs were chin tipped high (17.00%), and head turned to one side (9.9%), respectively. Among Class I, II, and III malocclusions, open lips were observed as the most frequent cephalometric radiographic errors (28.6, 15.4, and 16.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The percentage of radiographic errors increases with the intense workload. An anatomical structure may lead to patient-induced cephalometric radiographic errors.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVİRGEN, Ş., TİTİZ, S. (2022). The evaluation of panoramic, periapical, and cephalometric radiographic errors in dentistry. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 185–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/539489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology; principles and interpretation. 7th ed St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2014
  2. Subbulakshmi AC, Mohan N, Thiruneervannan R, Naveen S, Gokulraj S. Positioning errors in digital panoramic radiographs: A study. Journal of orofacial sciences 2016;8:22. (Crossref
  3. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics, 5e. Elsevier India; 2012 4. Mayil M, Keser G, Namdar PF. CBCT images of anatomic landmarks in maxillofacial region; 2014 (Crossref
  4. Valentin J, Boice Jr JD, Clarke RH, Cousins C, Gonzalez AJ, Lee J, Pentreath RJ. Published on behalf of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. 2007 6. Abdelkarim A. Orthodontic radiographs: Guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2016;149:141-142. (Crossref
  5. Calışkan A, Sumer AP. Definition, classification, and retrospective analysis of photostimulable phosphor image artifacts and errors in intraoral dental radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2017;46:20160188. (Crossref
  6. Loughlin A, Drage N, Greenall C, Farnell DJJ. An investigation into the impact of acquisition location on error type and rate when undertaking panoramic radiography. Radiography 2017;23:305-309. (Crossref
  7. Mourshed F. A study of intraoral radiographic errors made by dental students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:824- 828. (Crossref
  8. Rozylo KI. Technical Errors and Artefacts in Dental Radiography. In Imaging Techniques in Dental Radiology Springer, Cham; 2020. p. 79-125. (Crossref
  9. Yao Y, Dresner M, Zhu K. Improving Order Fulfillment by Beating the “Monday Blues”. Working paper. 2010
  10. Card D, McCall BP. Is Workers’ compensation covering uninsured medical costs? evidence from the “Monday effect.” ILR Rev 1996;49:690-706. (Crossref
  11. Taylor MP. Tell me why I don't like Mondays: investigating day of the week effects on job satisfaction and psychological wellbeing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2006;169:127-142. (Crossref
  12. Csikszentmihalyi M, Hunter J. Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling. J Happiness Stud 4 2003;4:185- 199. (Crossref
  13. Bryson A, MacKerron G. “Are you happy while you work?” Econ J 2012;127:106-125. (Crossref
  14. Langlais RP. Exercises in Oral Radiology and Interpretation-EBook. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016
  15. Bryson A, John F. "Are there day of the week productivity effects?."