Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection

Pages
180–184
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prevalence of E. faecalis was compared between healthy and sick individuals using the Chi-square test, significance was set at p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in samples of oral rinse and tongue dorsum of endodontic patients with secondary/persistent infections (EPSI) using the PCR method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Oral rinse samples (ORS) and tongue swab samples (TSS) of 22 patients (EPSI group) and 32 healthy individuals (control group) were collected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prevalence of E. faecalis was compared between healthy and sick individuals using the Chi-square test, significance was set at p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in samples of oral rinse and tongue dorsum of endodontic patients with secondary/persistent infections (EPSI) using the PCR method. Methodology: Oral rinse samples (ORS) and tongue swab samples (TSS) of 22 patients (EPSI group) and 32 healthy individuals (control group) were collected. DNA isolation from the TSS and ORS samples was performed using the modified classical phenol-chloroform and chloroform method. To detect E. faecalis strains directly from the TSS and ORS samples, the 310 base pair (bp) segment of the 16S rDNA of the E. faecalis genome was amplified by PCR using specific primers. The prevalence of E. faecalis was compared between healthy and sick individuals using the Chi-square test, significance was set at p

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, G., ASLAN, T., KESİM, B., ÜLGER, S. T., CUDAL, H., ERSOY, L., KÜÇÜK, M. Ö. (2022). Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 180–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/539488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Anatomic and microbiologic challenges to achieving success with endodontic treatment: a case report. J Endod 2008;34:1249-54. (Crossref
  2. Khalighinejad N, Aminoshariae MR, Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC, Mickel A, Fouad AF. Association between systemic diseases and apical periodontitis. J Endod 2016;42:1427-34. (Crossref
  3. Hong B-Y, Lee T-K, Lim S-M, Chang SW, Park J, Han SH, et al. Microbial analysis in primary and persistent endodontic infections by using pyrosequencing. J Endod 2013;39:1136-40. (Crossref
  4. Özok A, Persoon I, Huse S, Keijser B, Wesselink P, Crielaard W, et al. Ecology of the microbiome of the infected root canal system: a comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 2012;456:530-41. (Crossref
  5. Siqueira Jr JF, Roˆcas IN. Distinctive features of the microbiota associated with different forms of apical periodontitis. J Oral Microbiol 2009;1:2009. (Crossref
  6. Siqueira Jr J, Rôças I. Diversity of endodontic microbiota revisited. J Dent Res 2009; 88:969-81. (Crossref
  7. Murad C, Sassone L, Faveri M, Hirata Jr R, Figueiredo L, Feres M. Microbial diversity in persistent root canal infections investigated by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. J Endod 2014;40:899-906. (Crossref
  8. Tennert C, Fuhrmann M, Wittmer A, Karygianni L, Altenburger MJ, Pelz K, et al. New bacterial composition in primary and persistent/secondary endodontic infections with respect to clinical and radiographic findings. J Endod 2014;40:670-7. (Crossref
  9. Pourhajibagher M, Ghorbanzadeh R, Bahador A. Culturedependent approaches to explore the prevalence of root canal pathogens from endodontic infections. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31. (Crossref
  10. Sedgley C, Lennan S, Clewell D. Prevalence, phenotype and genotype of oral enterococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004;19:95-101. (Crossref
  11. Sedgley C, Nagel A, Shelburne C, Clewell D, Appelbe O, Molander A. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of oral Enterococcus faecalis in humans. Arch Oral Biol 2005;50:575- 83. (Crossref
  12. Sedgley C, Buck G, Appelbe O. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis at multiple oral sites in endodontic patients using culture and PCR. J Endod 2006;32:104-9. (Crossref
  13. Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN. PCR methodology as a valuable tool for identification of endodontic pathogens. J Dent 2003;31:333-9. (Crossref
  14. Shelburne CE, Prabhu A, Gleason RM, Mullally BH, Coulter WA. Quantitation of Bacteroides forsythus in subgingival plaque: comparison of immu