Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

The effects of current production techniques on the surface roughness, oxide layer thickness and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium and titanium substructures

Pages
129–139
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It should be kept in mind that there is no ideal production technique and that the effects of the production technique differ depending on the metal used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the oxide layer, surface roughness, and bond strength with porcelain of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and titanium (Ti) substructures produced using casting, milling and selective laser sintering techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: A total of 180 disc-shaped metal samples with a diameter of 1 cm and a thickness of 3 mm were produced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It should be kept in mind that there is no ideal production technique and that the effects of the production technique differ depending on the metal used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the oxide layer, surface roughness, and bond strength with porcelain of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and titanium (Ti) substructures produced using casting, milling and selective laser sintering techniques. Methodology: A total of 180 disc-shaped metal samples with a diameter of 1 cm and a thickness of 3 mm were produced. The samples were divided into six groups (n=15) according to the technique used to produce the metal substructures—casting, milling, and SLS—and the chemical composition of the metal substructure—Co-Cr and Ti. Then roughness averages (Ra) of the sample surfaced were calculated with a contact-type profilometer. Nondestructive energy-dispersive X-ray was performed to ensure that the layer displayed in contrast was the oxide layer, and the average oxide layer thickness was calculated from scanning electron microscope images. Metal-porcelain complexes were subjected to shear bond strength test and failure types were noted. Two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to compare oxide layer thickness, surface roughness, and shear bond strength according to the metal and production technique, and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used for multiple comparisons of the main effects. Results: Two-way MANOVA revealed that the metal and technique used in the substructure production had significant effects on surface roughness, oxide layer thickness and shear bond strength (p < 0.001). Ti groups exhibited thicker oxide layer formation than Co-Cr groups. Low surface roughness values were observed in the milling groups. The highest shear bond strength value (53.8 MPa) was observed in the Co-Cr group produced by casting, while the lowest value (32.2 MPa) was obtained in the Ti group produced by casting. Conclusion: It should be kept in mind that there is no ideal production technique and that the effects of the production technique differ depending on the metal used.

🔖

Cite This Article

Değirmenci, B. Ü., ERSOY, N. M. (2022). The effects of current production techniques on the surface roughness, oxide layer thickness and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium and titanium substructures. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 129–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/539479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Yoldan EE, Türker N, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Özarslan MM, Karalı R and Deniz AT. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths between Dental Porcelain and Cobalt-Chromium Metal Frameworks Manufactured with Different Techniques after the Thermal Aging Process. Scanning 2020;2020:9315236. (Crossref
  2. Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Park SH, Barmak AB and Özcan M. Adhesion of veneering porcelain to cobalt-chromium dental alloys processed with casting, milling, and additive manufacturing methods: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021. (Crossref
  3. Antanasova M, Kocjan A, Kovač J, Žužek B and Jevnikar P. Influence of thermo-mechanical cycling on porcelain bonding to cobalt-chromium and titanium dental alloys fabricated by casting, milling, and selective laser melting. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62(2):184-94. (Crossref
  4. Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC and Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater 2008;24(10):1400-4. (Crossref
  5. Dimitriadis K, Papadopoulos T and Agathopoulos S. Effect of Bonding Agent on Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength between CoCr Fabricated with Selective Laser Melting and Dental Feldspathic Porcelain. J Prosthodont 2019;28(9):1029-36. (Crossref
  6. Grimaudo NJ. Biocompatibility of nickel and cobalt dental alloys. Gen. Dent. 2001;49(5):498-503; quiz 4-5
  7. Buciumeanu M, Bagheri A, Souza JCM, Silva FS and Henriques B. Tribocorrosion behavior of hot pressed CoCrMo alloys in artificial saliva. Tribol. Int. 2016;97:423-30. (Crossref
  8. Al Hussaini I and Al Wazzan KA. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(4):350-6. (Crossref
  9. Iseri U, Ozkurt Z and Kazazoglu E. Shear bond strengths of veneering porcelain to cast, machined and laser-sintered titanium. Dent Mater J 2011;30(3):274-80. (Crossref
  10. Papia E, Arnoldsson P, Baudinova A, Jimbo R and Vult VONSP. Cast, milled and EBM-manufactured titanium, differences in porcelain shear bond strength. Dent Mater J 2018;37(2):214- 21. (Crossref
  11. Elsaka SE. Influence of surface treatments on adhesion of porcelain to titanium. J Prosthodont 2013;22(6):465-71. (Crossref
  12. Haag P and Nilner K. Bonding between titanium and dental porcelain: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68(3):154-64. (Crossref
  13. Cai Z, Bunce N, Nunn ME and Okabe T. Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: effects of surface modifications. Bi