Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Comparison of the accuracy of different electronic apex locators used in working length determination via changing of initial cleaning solutions

Pages
56–62
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the difference in the initial washing solutions did not affect the electronic apex locator (EAL) devices in making measurements close to the true length.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of the different new generation electronic apex locators by changing the initial cleaning solutions (NaOCl vs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The true lengths of the root canals were determined with a precision of 0.01 mm with a stereomicroscope at x5 magnification by placing a #20 K-type canal file into the root canal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the difference in the initial washing solutions did not affect the electronic apex locator (EAL) devices in making measurements close to the true length.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of the different new generation electronic apex locators by changing the initial cleaning solutions (NaOCl vs. EDTA). Methodology: Eighty mandibular premolar teeth were used. Radiographs were obtained from the mesio-distal, and bucco-lingual angles for all teeth, and teeth with suspected external or internal root resorption and/or calcified canals were not included in the study. The true lengths of the root canals were determined with a precision of 0.01 mm with a stereomicroscope at x5 magnification by placing a #20 K-type canal file into the root canal. The samples were then embedded in freshly mixed alginate blocks up to the cemento-enamel junction. The coronal 1/3 was pre-enlarged with a Protaper SX (VDW, Munich, Germany), instrument. Root ZX Mini (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan), Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany), Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and E-Pex Pro (Changzhou Sifary Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Jiangsu, China) electronic apex locators were used, and measurements were made by changing the initial solutions (NaOCl vs. EDTA). Distilled water was used between application of 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA to prevent chemical interactions. Three measurements were taken for each tooth, and the average of these three measurements was taken as reference. The data obtained in this study were analyzed. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the solutions in terms of the measurement values and actual length values found by each device (p>0.05). Although there were no statistically significant differences, the deviation from the actual measurement was greater when EDTA solution was used than when NaOCl solution was used. In addition, although the difference was not found to be statistically significant, the deviation from the actual measurement was found to be highest when the Root ZX mini device was used with NaOCl and EDTA solution. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the difference in the initial washing solutions did not affect the electronic apex locator (EAL) devices in making measurements close to the true length.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, S., AVCI, G. R. T. (2022). Comparison of the accuracy of different electronic apex locators used in working length determination via changing of initial cleaning solutions. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 56–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/539464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Journal of Endodontics, 2006; 32(4): p. 281-290. (Crossref
  2. Chugal NM, Clive JM, and Spångberg LS. Endodontic infection: some biologic and treatment factors associated with outcome. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2003; 96(1): p. 81-90. (Crossref
  3. Krishnan IS, and Sreedharan S. A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2012; 3(4): p. 416. (Crossref
  4. Stein TJ, and Corcoran JF. Radiographic “working length” revisited. Oral surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1992; 74(6): p. 796-800. (Crossref
  5. Moscoso S. Evaluation of Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6 electronic apex locators: an in vivo study. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2014; 19(2): p. e202. (Crossref
  6. ElAyouti A, Weiger R, and Löst C. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length. Journal of Endodontics, 2002; 28(2): p. 116- 119. (Crossref
  7. Retief D. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. American Journal of Dentistry, 1991; 4(5): p. 231-236
  8. Jakobson SJM. The accuracy in the control of the apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation using Root ZX II and ProTaper instruments: an in vivo study. Journal of Endodontics, 2008; 34(11): p. 1342-1345. (Crossref
  9. D’assunção F. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy and coefficient of repeatability of three electronic apex locators using a simple mounting model: a preliminary report. International Endodontic Journal, 2010; 43(4): p. 269-274. (Crossref
  10. Lucena-Martin C. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators. Journal of Endodontics, 2004; 30(4): p. 231-233. (Crossref
  11. Lipski M. Evaluation of alginate as a substitute for root‐ surrounding tissues in electronic root canal measurements. Australian Endodontic Journal, 2013; 39(3): p. 155-158. (Crossref
  12. Grove CJ. Why root canals should be filled to the dentinocemental junction. The Journal of the American Dental Association (1922), 1930; 17(2): p. 293-296. (Crossref
  13. Ricucci D, and Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. International Endodontic Journal, 1998; 31(6):p.394. (Crossref
  14. Trope M, Rabie G, and Tronstad L. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator under controlled clinical conditions.