Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Evaluation of the stress distribution in the cortical bone caused by variations in implant applications in patients with bruxism: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Pages
194–200
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increasing the occlusal thickness of the implant fixed prosthesis material, implant diameter, and number reduce the minimum and maximum principal stress values in the cortical

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the stress distribution in the cortical bone under parafunctional forces with different occlusal thicknesses, monolithic zirconia with different implant diameters, and number variations in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations applied in patients with bruxism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Modeled bone height is 30 mm, cortical bone thickness is 1.5 mm, and trabecular bone thickness is modeled as 13 mm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increasing the occlusal thickness of the implant fixed prosthesis material, implant diameter, and number reduce the minimum and maximum principal stress values in the cortical
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the stress distribution in the cortical bone under parafunctional forces with different occlusal thicknesses, monolithic zirconia with different implant diameters, and number variations in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations applied in patients with bruxism. Methodology: The tomographic sections of the previously registered mandible were used to model the mandible. Modeled bone height is 30 mm, cortical bone thickness is 1.5 mm, and trabecular bone thickness is modeled as 13 mm. By placing two implants in the created bone model, a three-member main model (Group 1), the number of implants was increased, three implants supported the Group 2 models, the diameter of the implants was increased, and the Group 3 models were created. The created Group 1, 2, 3 models, the occlusal thickness was divided into subgroups with 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm, respectively (Groups A, B, and C). The groups were applied in two directions: vertical and 30o oblique. Stress values under forces were analyzed by finite element stress analysis. Results: Under vertical loading, the maximum principal stress value in the cortical bone was found to be lowest in Group 2C, and the highest maximum principal stress value was found in Group 1A. The minimum principal stress value in the cortical bone was found to be the lowest in Group 3C, and the highest minimum principal stress value was found in Group 1A. Under oblique loading, the maximum principal stress value in the cortical bone was found to be the lowest in Group 3C and the highest maximum principal stress value was found in Group 1A. The minimum principal stress value in the cortical bone was found to be lowest in Group 3C, and the highest minimum principal stress value was found in Group1A. Conclusion: Stresses caused by oblique forces are more than vertical forces. Increasing the occlusal thickness of the implant fixed prosthesis material, implant diameter, and number reduce the minimum and maximum principal stress values in the cortical

🔖

Cite This Article

KANTACİ, Y., ÜLKÜ, S. Z. (2022). Evaluation of the stress distribution in the cortical bone caused by variations in implant applications in patients with bruxism: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 194–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/539449

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, and Naeije M, Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants–an updated review. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2006. 33(4): p. 293-300. (Crossref
  2. Manfredini D and Lobbezoo F, Role of psychosocial factors in the etiology of bruxism. Journal of orofacial pain, 2009. 23(2): p. 153-166
  3. Ahlberg J, et al., Reported bruxism and biopsychosocial symptoms: a longitudinal study. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2004. 32(4): p. 307-311. (Crossref
  4. Baiamonte T, et al., The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. The Journal of oral implantology, 1995. 22(2): p. 104-110
  5. Melsen B and Lang NP, Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clinical oral implants research, 2001. 12(2): p. 144-152. (Crossref
  6. Isidor F, Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clinical oral implants research, 1996. 7(2): p. 143-152. (Crossref
  7. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, and Lindhe J, Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2005. 32(9): p. 925-932. (Crossref
  8. Petrie, C.S. and J.L. Williams, Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. Clinical oral implants research, 2005. 16(4): p. 486-494. (Crossref
  9. Chrcanovic BR, et al., Bruxism and dental implant treatment complications: a retrospective comparative study of 98 bruxer patients and a matched group. Clinical oral implants research, 2016. (Crossref
  10. Lobbezoo F, et al., Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2006. 33(2): p. 152- 159. (Crossref
  11. Göre E and Evlioğlu G, Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2014. 40(1): p. 68-75. (Crossref
  12. Asmussen, E., A. Peutzfeldt, and A. Sahafi, Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowelrestored teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2005. 94(4): p. 321-329. (Crossref
  13. Xiao, J.-R., et al., The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite eleme