SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the effectiveness of reciprocal and conventional shaping systems and EDDY and CanalBrush activation systems in calcium hydroxide removal

Selen İnce Yusufoğlu
Neslihan Büşra Keskin
Pages
16–22
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant difference between the R50 and PTU F5 systems in calcium hydroxide removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two preparation systems and two irrigation techniques in calcium hydroxide removal from straight root canals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The teeth were filled with a calcium hydroxide-based paste and randomly divided into two different preparation groups (Reciproc 50 (R50; VDW, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper Universal F5 (PTU; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant difference between the R50 and PTU F5 systems in calcium hydroxide removal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two preparation systems and two irrigation techniques in calcium hydroxide removal from straight root canals. Methodology: Forty-four mandibular premolar teeth were included in this study. The teeth were filled with a calcium hydroxide-based paste and randomly divided into two different preparation groups (Reciproc 50 (R50; VDW, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper Universal F5 (PTU; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Subsequently, the groups were divided into two subgroups and irrigated using EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany) and CanalBrush (CB; Roeko, Langenau, Germany) irrigation activation systems. The percentage of calcium hydroxide removed from the canal walls was analyzed using a dental operating microscope (DOM) at 25× magnification. An independent samples t-test, a Mann–Whitney U, Wilcoxon’s tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was no significant difference in calcium hydroxide removal throughout the root canal using the R50 and PTU F5 preparation systems (P = 0.847). Both activation systems significantly increased the amount of calcium hydroxide removed from the root canal. Conclusion: EDDY and CB significantly improved calcium hydroxide removal. There was no significant difference between the R50 and PTU F5 systems in calcium hydroxide removal.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yusufoğlu, S. İ., Keskin, N. B. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of reciprocal and conventional shaping systems and EDDY and CanalBrush activation systems in calcium hydroxide removal. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/539447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Jr J F Siqueira. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 1-10. (Crossref
  2. Zand V, Mokhtari H, Hasani A, Jabbari G. Comparison of the Penetration Depth of Conventional and Nano-Particle Calcium Hydroxide into Dentinal Tubules. Iran Endod J 2017;12:366–70
  3. Mohammadi Z, Dummer P M H. Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J 2011;44:697–730. (Crossref
  4. Safavi K E, Nichols F C. Alteration of biological properties of bacterial lipopolysaccharide by calcium hydroxide treatment. J Endod 1994;20:127–9. (Crossref
  5. Gomes, B. P. F. D. A., Ferraz, C. C. R., Vianna, M. E., Rosalen, P. L., Zaia, A. A., Teixeira, F. B., & Souza-Filho, F. J. D In vitro antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles against selected microorganisms. Braz Dent J 2002;13:155–61. (Crossref
  6. Balvedi R P A, Versiani M A, Manna F F, Biffi J C G. A comparison of two techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals. Int Endod J 2010;43:763–8. (Crossref
  7. Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study. J Endod 2006;32:1097–101. (Crossref
  8. Kuga, M. C., Campos, E. A. D., Faria-Junior, N. B. D., Só, M. V. R., & Shinohara, A. L. Efficacy of NiTi rotary instruments in removing calcium hydroxide dressing residues from root canal walls. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:19–23. (Crossref
  9. Vilela, D. D., Neto, M. M., Villela, A. M., & Pithon, M. M. Evaluation of interference of calcium hydroxide-based intracanal medication in filling root canal systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:368–71. (Crossref
  10. Kenee D. M, Allemang J. D, Johnson J. D, Hellstein J, Nichol B. K. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Endod 2006;32:563–5. (Crossref
  11. Phillips M, McClanahan S, Bowles W. A titration model for evaluating calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23:94–100. (Crossref) 12. de Oliveira, R. L., Guerisoli, D. M., Duque, J. A., Alcalde, M. P., Onoda, H. K., Domingues, F. H. F., et al. Computed microtomography evaluation of calcium hydroxide-based root canal dressing removal from oval root canals by different methods of irrigation. Microsc Res Tech 2019;82:232–7. (Crossref
  12. Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Burklein S, Schafer E. Removal of Calc