Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Technical and biological causes of periapical surgery: Retrospective analysis of 301 apical surgical cases

Pages
38–45
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increasing the quality of the root canal treatments applied by dentists will reduce the need for periapical surgery by reducing the incidence of apical periodontitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Endodontic surgery is a treatment for persistent peri-radicular pathological conditions that do not improve after endodontic treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Clinical and radiographic data of 301 periapical surgery cases were retrospectively evaluated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increasing the quality of the root canal treatments applied by dentists will reduce the need for periapical surgery by reducing the incidence of apical periodontitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Endodontic surgery is a treatment for persistent peri-radicular pathological conditions that do not improve after endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of endodontic treatment, technical error types seen in root canals, and the periapical condition of the teeth in patients undergoing periapical surgery, and thus to analyze the reasoning behind the decision to perform periapical surgery. Methodology: Clinical and radiographic data of 301 periapical surgery cases were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The reasons for performing periapical surgery were classified as either technical or biological. Results: In this study, 51.8% of periapical surgery cases were related to biological factors, and 48.2% were related to technical factors. Maxillary anterior teeth were the most common teeth to undergo apical surgery, with a rate of 66.8%. The most common technical reasons for surgery were non-homogeneous filling (15.6%), underfilling (12%), and overfilling (9.6%). The most common biological reasons were cysts (30.2%), traumas (16.6%), and apical abscesses (5%). In 37.5% of cases, the diameter of the cystic lesion was 10 mm or larger. Conclusion: The number of cases of apical periodontitis is increasing in the Turkish community due to insufficiently filled root canals. Increasing the quality of the root canal treatments applied by dentists will reduce the need for periapical surgery by reducing the incidence of apical periodontitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ekici, Ö. (2022). Technical and biological causes of periapical surgery: Retrospective analysis of 301 apical surgical cases. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 38–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/539441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis / [edited by] Dag Ørstavik, Thomas R. Pitt Ford. - Version details - Trove [Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 31]. Available from: https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/6297000?selectedversion=NBD 25310600 2. Rahbaran S, Gilthorpe MS, Harrison SD, Gulabivala K. Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: A retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Jun 1
  2. 91(6):700–9. (Crossref) 3. Estrela C, Holland R, de Araújo Estrela CR, Alencar AHG, SousaNeto MD, Pécora JD. Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Braz Dent J. 2014
  3. 25(1):3–11. (Crossref) 4. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: Part 1: Periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011 Jul
  4. 44(7):583–609. (Crossref) 5. Siqueira JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Vol. 34, International Endodontic Journal. 2001. p. 1–10. (Crossref) 6. Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc. 2005
  5. 136(2):187–93. (Crossref) 7. Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky PE, Pharoah MJ, Friedman S. Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of rootfilled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J. 2003 Mar 1
  6. 36(3):181–92. (Crossref) 8. Chandler NP, Koshy S. The changing role of the apicectomy operation in dentistry. Vol. 47, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 2002. p. 660–7. 9. Carrillo C, Peñarrocha M, Bagán JV, Vera F. Relationship Between Histological Diagnosis and Evolution of 70 Periapical Lesions at 12 Months, Treated by Periapical Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Aug
  7. 66(8):1606–9. (Crossref) 10. Sánchez-Torres A, Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Gay-Escoda C. Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014
  8. 19(4). (Crossref) 11. Lieblich SE. Endodontic Surgery. Vol. 56, Dental Clinics of North America. 2012. p. 121–32. (Crossref) 12. El-Swiah JM, Walker RT. Reasons for apicectomies. A retrospective study. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996 Aug
  9. 12(4):185–91. (Crossref) 13. Venskutonis T, Plotino G, Tocci L, Gambarini G, Maminskas J, Juodzbalys G. Periapical and endodontic status scale based on periapical bone lesions and endodontic treatment quality evaluation using cone-beam com