Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 157 - Sayı: 157

The Relationship of Landslides with lithological units and fault lines occurring on the East Anatolian Fault Zone, between Palu (Elazığ) and Bingöl, Turkey

Pages
23–38
Publication Date
2018-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fact that landslides have occurred along the fault lines in the north of Murat Valley shows that the landslides are triggered more by earthquakes when compared with those triggered by the hydro meteorological events.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship of landslides with lithological units and fault lines on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) between Palu (Elazığ) and Bingöl, was evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to these results, 59% of landslides occur in Upper Miocene-Pliocene agglomerate and tuff units and 10% of them in Eocene carbonate units.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fact that landslides have occurred along the fault lines in the north of Murat Valley shows that the landslides are triggered more by earthquakes when compared with those triggered by the hydro meteorological events.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Landslides · East Anatolian · Elazığ

Abstract

In this study, the relationship of landslides with lithological units and fault lines on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) between Palu (Elazığ) and Bingöl, was evaluated. In the study area, which is located within the EAFZ, Göynük to the northeast, Palu Segment to the southwest, Genç Segment to the south of Bingöl plain and Gökdere Uplift in the intersection area form the main tectonic structures. In addition, the Karakoçan Fault Zone (KFZ) cutting the EAFZ in NW-SE direction between Palu and Bingöl corresponds to another important structure (system). The area, which is located in a region where a number of faults intersect, is tectonically very active. This situation has affected the morphology and caused the formation of many landslides along fault lines. In order to determine the relationship between the landslides observed in this area and lithological and tectonic structures, landslide magnitude and distribution analyses were performed by means of Geographical Information Systems. For this purpose, the landslide inventory map and the database were reproduced controlling the satellite images in field studies. Similarly; geological and tectonic maps were prepared considering previous studies. Landslides created in vector format were converted into raster format and overlain with lithological and tectonic maps, and then the relationship between landslides and lithology-fault lines were determined. According to these results, 59% of landslides occur in Upper Miocene-Pliocene agglomerate and tuff units and 10% of them in Eocene carbonate units. According to these data, almost 70% of the landslides in the study area occurred in two units. Considering the relationship between landslides and fault lines 64% of the landslides are observed at 0-1000 m distances to the fault lines. As a result, there is an important relationship between lithological features and fault lines. The fact that landslides have occurred along the fault lines in the north of Murat Valley shows that the landslides are triggered more by earthquakes when compared with those triggered by the hydro meteorological events.

Özet

In this study, the relationship of landslides with lithological units and fault lines on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) between Palu (Elazığ) and Bingöl, was evaluated. In the study area, which is located within the EAFZ, Göynük to the northeast, Palu Segment to the southwest, Genç Segment to the south of Bingöl plain and Gökdere Uplift in the intersection area form the main tectonic structures. In addition, the Karakoçan Fault Zone (KFZ) cutting the EAFZ in NW-SE direction between Palu and Bingöl corresponds to another important structure (system). The area, which is located in a region where a number of faults intersect, is tectonically very active. This situation has affected the morphology and caused the formation of many landslides along fault lines. In order to determine the relationship between the landslides observed in this area and lithological and tectonic structures, landslide magnitude and distribution analyses were performed by means of Geographical Information Systems. For this purpose, the landslide inventory map and the database were reproduced controlling the satellite images in field studies. Similarly; geological and tectonic maps were prepared considering previous studies. Landslides created in vector format were converted into raster format and overlain with lithological and tectonic maps, and then the relationship between landslides and lithology-fault lines were determined. According to these results, 59% of landslides occur in Upper Miocene-Pliocene agglomerate and tuff units and 10% of them in Eocene carbonate units. According to these data, almost 70% of the landslides in the study area occurred in two units. Considering the relationship between landslides and fault lines 64% of the landslides are observed at 0-1000 m distances to the fault lines. As a result, there is an important relationship between lithological features and fault lines. The fact that landslides have occurred along the fault lines in the north of Murat Valley shows that the landslides are triggered more by earthquakes when compared with those triggered by the hydro meteorological events.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCİ, V., SUNKAR, M. (2018). The Relationship of Landslides with lithological units and fault lines occurring on the East Anatolian Fault Zone, between Palu (Elazığ) and Bingöl, Turkey. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 157 - Sayı: 157, 23–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/53932

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akıncı, H., Doğan, S., Kılıçoğlu, C. and Keçeci, S. B. 2010. Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 2 (3), pp.13-27.
  2. Aksoy, E. İnceöz, M. and Koçyiğit, A. 2007. Lake Hazar Basin: A Negative Flower Structure on the East Anatolian Fault System (EAFS), SE Turkey, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 16, pp.319-338.
  3. Altınlı, E. 1963, 1/500.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritası Erzurum Paftası İzahnamesi, MTA Enstitüsü Yayınları, No: 131, Ankara.
  4. Ambraseys, N. N. and Jackson, J. A. 1998. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophysical Journal International, 133, pp.390-406.
  5. Arpat, E. and Şaroğlu, F.1972. Doğu Anadolu Fayı ile İlgili Gözlemler ve Düşünceler. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi, 78, pp.44-50.
  6. Arpat, E. and Şaroğlu, F. 1975. Turkiye’deki Bazı önemli Genç Tektonik Olaylar. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 18, pp.29–41.
  7. Atalay, İ. 1974-1977. Muş-Palu Arasındaki Murat Vadisi Boyunca Oluşan Kütle Hareketleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20-21, pp.263-279.
  8. Avci, V. 2016. Gökdere Havzası ve Çevresinin (Bingöl Güneybatısı) Frekans Oranı Metoduna Göre Heyelan Duyarlılık Analizi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 34, pp.160-177.
  9. Avci, V. Sunkar, M. 2016. The Distribution of Landslides Observed in Murat River Valley Between Bingöl and Palu (Elazığ) by Geomorphological Factors, (Ed. Recep EFE, İsa CÜREBAL, Gülnara NYUSSUPOVA, Emin ATASOY) Recent Research in Interdisciplinary Sciences (Chapter 31), Sofia University, St Klement Ohridsky-Publishing House, ISBN 978-954-07-4141-3.
  10. Barka, A. A. Kadinsky-Cade, K. 1988. Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics, 7(3), pp.663–684.
  11. Bulut, F. Boynukalın, S. Tarhan, F. and Ataoğlu, E. 1995. Fındıklı ilçesi (Rize) Doğu Yöresindeki Heyelanların Nedenleri. II. Ulusal Heyelan Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Adapazarı, pp.143-152.
  12. Cihangir, M. E. and Görüm, T. (2016). Kelkit Vadisi’nin Aşağı Çığırında Gelişmiş Heyelanların Dağılım Deseni ve Oluşumlarını Kontrol Eden Faktörler, Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 66, pp.19-28.
  13. Çetin, H. Güneyli, H. and Mayer, L. 2003. Palaeoseismology of the Palu-Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 374, pp.163-197.
  14. Dağ, S. Bulut, F. and Akgün, A. 2006. İki Değişkenli istatistiksel Analiz Yöntemi ile Çayeli (Rize) ve Çevresindeki Heyelanların Değerlendirilmesi, 1. Heyelan Sempozyumu,