SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Insight Turkey / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 01

Securitization of Migration in the EU and Africa: A Case Study

Sibel YANIK ASLAN
Pages
153–172
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It assesses the success or failure of these policies and asks why the unsuccessful policies failed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The phenomenon of migration, seen at every stage of human history, became politicized after the Second World War, was restricted after the 1973 oil crisis, and was included among the various security issues after the Cold War.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the 9/11 attacks and the explosions in the leading cities in Europe, migration became the focus of security policies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It assesses the success or failure of these policies and asks why the unsuccessful policies failed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The phenomenon of migration, seen at every stage of human history, became politicized after the Second World War, was restricted after the 1973 oil crisis, and was included among the various security issues after the Cold War. As a result of the 9/11 attacks and the explosions in the leading cities in Europe, migration became the focus of security policies. This study analyzes the securitization of migration from Africa to Europe as a case study through the lens of the Copenhagen School and explores the European Union’s efforts to create a common migration policy. It asks to what extent the relationship between migration and security affects these and argues that decisions taken under the influence of securitization hinder the creation of an effective immigration policy. It assesses the success or failure of these policies and asks why the unsuccessful policies failed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, S. Y. (2022). Securitization of Migration in the EU and Africa: A Case Study. Insight Turkey, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 01, 153–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/539131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sabri Çakır, “Geleneksel Türk Kültüründe Göç ve Toplumsal Değişme,” Journal of Social Sciences, No. 24 (2011), pp. 12-14
  2. Eytan Meyers, “Multilateral Cooperation, Integration and Regimes: The Case of International Labor Mobility,” The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, Working Paper No. 61 (2002)
  3. Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 8
  4. Buzan, People, States and Fear, p. 8
  5. Gökay Özerim, “Avrupa’da Göç Politikalarının Ulusüstüleşmesi ve Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü: Avrupa Göç Tarihinde Yeni Bir Dönem mi?” Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2014), pp. 11-48
  6. Sühal Şemşit, “Avrupa Birliği Göç Politikasının Güvenlikleştirilmesi ve Dışsallaştırılması: Türkiye’ye Yansımaları,” Dokuz Eylül University Social Sciences Institute, Unpublished PhD Thesis, (2010)
  7. Stephan Castles and Mark J. Miller, Göçler Çağı, (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Publications, 2008)
  8. Peter Stalker, The No-Nonsense Guide to International Migration, (Oxford: New International Publications Ltd., 2001), p. 23
  9. Andrew Heywood, Küresel Siyaset, (İstanbul: Adres Publications, 2013), p. 87
  10. Nazif Mandacı and Gökay Özerim, “Uluslararası Göçlerin Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü: Avrupa’da Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi,” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Vol. 10, No. 39 (2013), pp. 105-130
  11. Mandacı and Özerim, “Uluslararası Göçlerin Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü.
  12. Özerim, “Avrupa’da Göç Politikalarının Ulusüstüleşmesi ve Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü.” 13. “Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Study on the Links between Legal and Illegal Migration,” European Commission, (2004), retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004DC0412&from=EN. 14. “Asylum and New Asylum Applicants: Monthly Data,” Eurostat, (2018), retrieved from
  13. Ayhan Kaya, Avrupa Birliği Hakkında Merak Ettikleriniz, Avrupa Birliği’ne Giriş, (İstanbul: Hiperlink Yayınları, 2013), p. 104. 16. “Asylum and New Asylum Applicants.
  14. Michał Krzyżanowski, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak, “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe,” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1-2, retrieved from ht