Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 158 - Sayı: 158

Tectonostratigraphic characteristics of the area between Çayeli (Rize) and İspir (Erzurum)

Pages
1–29
Publication Date
2019-04-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The MTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid I, Eocene Kaçkar granitoid II, Late Eocene Ardeşen gabbro, while the TTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid-I, Late Eocene Güllübağ monzonite.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study area is located in the Eastern Pontides between Rize, Çayeli, Arhavi, İspir and İkizdere.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MTS is composed from old to young; Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous limestone (Berdiga fm.); Turonian- Santonian conglomerate, sandstone, micritic limestone, siltstone, marl, basaltic, basaltic-andesitic lava, pyroclastites (Çatak fm.); Santonian rhyolitic, dacitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Kızılkaya fm.); late Santonian-Campanian basaltic, andesitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Caglayan fm.); Campanian-Mastrihtian rhyolitic, dacitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Çayırbağ fm.);late Maastrichtian-Danian sandstone, claystone, tuff, marl, clayey limestone (Cankurtaran fm.).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The MTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid I, Eocene Kaçkar granitoid II, Late Eocene Ardeşen gabbro, while the TTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid-I, Late Eocene Güllübağ monzonite.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eastern pontides · Maçka tectonic slice · Taşköprü tectonic slice

Abstract

The study area is located in the Eastern Pontides between Rize, Çayeli, Arhavi, İspir and İkizdere. In this area, Maçka Tectonic Slice (MTS) and Taşköprü Tectonic Slice (TTS) are exposed. MTS is composed from old to young; Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous limestone (Berdiga fm.); Turonian- Santonian conglomerate, sandstone, micritic limestone, siltstone, marl, basaltic, basaltic-andesitic lava, pyroclastites (Çatak fm.); Santonian rhyolitic, dacitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Kızılkaya fm.); late Santonian-Campanian basaltic, andesitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Caglayan fm.); Campanian-Mastrihtian rhyolitic, dacitic lava, pyroclastites, sandstone, clayey limestone (Çayırbağ fm.);late Maastrichtian-Danian sandstone, claystone, tuff, marl, clayey limestone (Cankurtaran fm.). Sedimentary, volcanosedimentary units in the Late Paleocene-Quaternary range (Erenler, Kaplıca, Melyat, Pazar, Hamidiye formations, and Handüzü, Çağırankaya volcanites) unconformably overlies the MTS. In the study area, Turonian- Maastrichtian basaltic andesitic lavaş, pyroclastites and sandstone, micritic limestone, claystone units (Yağmurdere fm.) belonging to TTS are observed, and Early-Middle Eocene sedimentary and volcanosedimentary units (Yedigöze, Çoruh formations) unconformably overlies the TTS. According to Ar/Ar dating, Çayırbağ formation was determined as 83.2±1.0 Ma, Melyat formation as 47.8±1.6 Ma, and Handüzü volcanics as 4.25±0.55 Ma for andesite level and as 3.93±0.46 Ma for dacite level. The MTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid I, Eocene Kaçkar granitoid II, Late Eocene Ardeşen gabbro, while the TTS was intruded by Cretaceous-Paleocene Kaçkar granitoid-I, Late Eocene Güllübağ monzonite.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAN, İ., BALCI, V., KESKİN, H., ALTUN, İ., BÖKE, N., DEMİRBAĞ, H., ARMAN, S., ELİBOL, H., SOYAKİL, M., KOP, A., HANİLÇİ, N. (2019). Tectonostratigraphic characteristics of the area between Çayeli (Rize) and İspir (Erzurum). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 158 - Sayı: 158, 1–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/53913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adamia, S. H., Lordkipanidze, M. B., Zakariadze, G. S. 1977. Evolution of an active continental margin as exemplified by the Alpine history of the Caycasus. Tectonophysics 40, 183-199.
  2. Adamia, S. H., Bayraktutan, S., Lordkipanidze, M., Kuloshvili, S., Maisuradze, G., Chkhotua, T. 1992. Geology of Eastern Pontides (Artvin and Erzurum Districts). Geol. Inst. Ac. Sci. Georgia, 124 p. Ağar, Ü. 1977. Demirözü (Bayburt) ve Köse (Kelkit) Bölgesinin Jeolojisi: Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, 595. s. İstanbul.
  3. Akdeniz, N. 1988. Demirözü Permo-Karboniferi ve bölgesel yapı içindeki yeri: Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 31/1, 70-80.
  4. Akdeniz, N., Akçaören, F., Timur, E. 1994. Aşkale-İspir arasının jeolojisi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Derleme Rapor No. 9731, Ankara.
  5. Akıncı Ö. T., Barbieri, M., Calderoni, G., Delita, C., Ferrini, V., Masi, U., Nicoletti, M., Petrucciani, C., Tolomeo, L. 1991. The Geochemistry of hydrothermaly altered rocks of the lower volcanic cycle from the Eastern Pontides (Trabzon, NE Turkey). Chem, Erde, 51, 173-186.
  6. Altınlı, İ., E. 1970. İkizdere granit karmaşığı (İkizdere granite complex). İstanbul Üniversitesi,
  7. Fen Fakültesi Mecmuası, Tabii İlimler, Seri B, XXXV, 3-4, 161-167.
  8. Arni, P. 1939. Tektonische Grundzüge Ostanatoliens und Benachbarter Gebiete: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü. Veröff. Ser. B, No. 4, Ankara.
  9. Aydınçakır, E., Şen, C. 2013. Petrogenesis of the post- collisional volcanic rocks from the Borçka (Artvin) area: implications for the evolution of the Eocene magmatism in the Eastern Pontides (NE Turkey), Lithos 172-173, 98-117.
  10. Badgley, P. C. 1959. Stratigraphy and petroleum possibilities of the Sinop Region: Tidewater Atlantic-Texaco Exploration Group., Petrol Dairesi Başkanlığı Teknik Arşivi, Ankara.
  11. Barbieri, M., Calderoni, G., Ferrini, V., Masi, U., Nicoletti, M., Petrucciani, C., Tolomeo, L. 1985. Geochemistry and geochronology of volcanic rocks from Eastern Pontides (Trabzon, NE Turkey). Terra Cognita 5, 280. Bektaş, O., Van A., Boynukalın S. 1987. Doğu Pontitlerde (Kuzeydoğu Türkiye) Jura volkanizması ve tektoniği, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 30, 9-18.
  12. Bektaş, O., Yılmaz, C., Taslı, K. 1995. Doğu Pontid yay gerisi havzasında derin yayılma çukurlarının oluşumu (KD Türkiye): Neo-Tetis’in pasif kıta kenarı evrimi, KTÜ Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü 30. Yıl Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, I, 263-274.
  13. Bektaş, O., Şen, C., Atıcı, Y., Köprübaşı, N. 1999. Migration of the Upper Cretaceous subduction-related volcanis