Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Cuscuta babylonica Aucher (küsküt) parazitliğinin Carthamus glaucus Bieb.subsp. glaucus'un Fenolik İçeriği Üzerine Etkisi

The effect of Cuscuta babylonica Aucher (Cuscuta) parasitism on the phenolic contents of Carthamus glaucus Bieb.subsp. glaucus

Pages
31–39
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated a rise in phenolic contents that known as defense chemicals quinic acid, gallic acid, tr-caffeic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and naringenin with dodder infestation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cuscuta species are holoparazit plants which obtained all need water and organic material from host plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the plant Carthamus glaucus Bieb. subsp. glaucus (Compositae) used as host plant is an important plant that contains several compounds inhibit the STAT-3 gene is directly related to prostate cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated a rise in phenolic contents that known as defense chemicals quinic acid, gallic acid, tr-caffeic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and naringenin with dodder infestation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cuscuta species are holoparazit plants which obtained all need water and organic material from host plants. The host plants are generally synthesized a variety of phenolic compounds in response to attack of parasitic plants. In this study, the plant Carthamus glaucus Bieb. subsp. glaucus (Compositae) used as host plant is an important plant that contains several compounds inhibit the STAT-3 gene is directly related to prostate cancer. In the study it was investigated that the effect of Cuscuta babylonica parasitism phenolic compounds of C. glaucus. The phenolic compounds of infected and uninfected C.glaucus plants analysed by LC/MS-MS. The results indicated a rise in phenolic contents that known as defense chemicals quinic acid, gallic acid, tr-caffeic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and naringenin with dodder infestation. Besides in the content of tr-aconitic acid, vanillin, hesperidin, 4-OH-benzoic acid, salicylic acid and kaempferol decreased after dodder infestation.

Özet

Küsküt türleri, ihtiyaçları olan tüm su ve organik maddeleri konak bitkiden alan holoparazit bitkilerdir. Konak bitkiler genellikle bu bitkilerin saldırılarına karşı çeşitli fenolik bileşikler sentezlerler. Bu çalışmada konak bitki olarak kullanılanCarthamus glaucus Bieb. subsp. glaucus (Compositae) C.babylonica parazitliliğinin prostat kanseri ile direkt ilişkili olan STAT-3 genini inhibe eden çeşitli bileşikleri içeren çeşitli bir bitkidir. Çalışmada, C. Glaucus'un fenolik bileşen içeriği üzerine olan etkisi araştırılmıştır. Parazit bitki ile enfekte olan ve olmayan C.glaucus bitkilerinin fenolik bileşen içerikleri LC/MS-MS ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, savunma kimyasalları olarak bilinen kuinik asit, gallik asit, tr-kaffeik asit, hiperosid, kuersetinve naringenin içeriklerinde bir artış olduğunu göstermiştir.Bunun yanında tr-akonitik asit, vanillin, hesperidin, 4-OH-benzoik asit, salisilik asit ve kaemferol içerikleri küsküt bulaşması sonrası azalmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SURMUŞ, H. A., ÖZEN, H. Ç. (2022). Cuscuta babylonica Aucher (küsküt) parazitliğinin Carthamus glaucus Bieb.subsp. glaucus'un Fenolik İçeriği Üzerine Etkisi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 31–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/538595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ananthakrishnan TN, Daniel Wesley S, John Peter A, Marimuthu S, 1994. Ecological interactions of Helicoverpa armigera and its natural enemies. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 20: 317-331. Antonova TS, terBorg ST, 1996. The role of peroxidase in the resistance of sunflower against Orobanche cumane in Russia. Weed Research 36: 113-121.
  2. Arnau M, Renaudin S, Fer A, 1996. Investigations into the cellular and biochemical events involed in the resistance of a legume, (Phaseolus vulgaris) to a parasitic higher plant, Cuscuta reflexa. M.T. Moreno J.I 592-596. Arrantlrakrislman TN, 1997. Gallic and salicylic acids: sentinels of plant defence against insects. Current Science 73. Baytop T, 1997. Türkçe bitki adları sözlüğü; Türk Dil Kurumu Basımevi: Ankara Türkiye p 578. Beckman CH, 2000. Phenolic-storing cells: keys to programmed cell death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in general defence responses in plants? Physiol Mol Plant P 57: 101-110.
  3. Bennett RN, Wallsgrove RM, 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defense mechanisms. New Phytol 127: 617-633. Boudet A, 2007. Evolution and current status of research in phenolic compounds. Phytochemistry 68: 2722-2735.
  4. Bouwmeeste HJ, Matusova R, Zhongkui S, Beale MH, 2003. Secondary metabolite signalling in host-parasitic plant interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 358-364. Chou CH, 1999. Roles of allelopathy in plant biodiversity and sustainable agriculture. Crit Rev in Plant Sci 18: 609- 636. Clé C, Hill LM, Niggewe R, Martin CR, Guisez Y, Prinsen E, Jansen MAK, 2008. Modulation of chlorogenic acid biosynthesisin Solanum lycopersicum; consequences for phenolic accumulationand UV-tolerance. Phytochemistry 69: 2149-2156.
  5. Daayf F, El Hadrami A, El-Bebany AF, Henriquez MA, Yao Z, Derksen H, Adam LR, 2012. Phenolic compounds in plant defense and pathogen counter-defense mechanisms. Rec Adv Polyphen Res3 191. Dakora FD, Phillips DA, 1996. Diverse functions of isoflavonoids in legumes transcend anti-microbial definitions of phytoalexins. Physiol Mol Plant P49 1-20.
  6. Dangl JL, Jones JDG, 2001. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411: 826-833.
  7. Delsignore A, Romeo F, Giaccio M, 1997. Content of phenolic substances in basidiomycetes. Mycol Res 101: 552-556.
  8. Deng F, Aoki M, Yogo Y, 2004. Effect of naringenin on the growth and lignin biosynthesis of gramoineous plants. Weed Biol Manag 4: 49-55. Dmitriev AP, 2003. Signal molecules for plant defense responses to biotic stress. Russ J of Plant Ph